On Thu, Dec 13, 2001 at 01:06:11AM +0100, Denis Barbier wrote:
[...]
Last, if build runs fine, someone should remove old files to prevent
problems with content negociation:
cd /org/www.debian.org/debian.org/international/l10n
rm po-* templates-* team-* l10n* i18n*
and also remove
On Thu, Dec 13, 2001 at 01:06:11AM +0100, Denis Barbier wrote:
Last, if build runs fine,
Seems it did. clap clap :)
someone should remove old files to prevent
problems with content negociation:
cd /org/www.debian.org/debian.org/international/l10n
rm po-* templates-* team-* l10n*
On Wed, Dec 12, 2001 at 03:59:48PM +0100, Benoit Rouits wrote:
Hello,
just a word to say that none of the links work in page :
http://www.debian.org/intl/l10n/po-fr
Yes, these pages were being redesigned, everything seems to be right just
now. Please note that there has been some changes in
Hmm. the person that wrote the following has no attribution in the mail
I'm responding to.
One of the biggest publicity items for Debian is it's website, however
the very important /intro/ section seems less than complete to me. I
intend to help out in this area and I wanted to see if
In reference to a message from Josip Rodin, dated Dec 08:
On Sat, Dec 08, 2001 at 02:08:22PM -0500, Christopher C. Chimelis wrote:
Is it just me, or did the link to http://www.debian.org/ports disappear
from the main page? Any reason for this?
* James A. Treacy [EMAIL PROTECTED] [011213 11:03]:
Hmm. the person that wrote the following has no attribution in the mail
I'm responding to.
Hi James,
That was me. Kyle missed the attribution.
One of the biggest publicity items for Debian is it's website, however
the very important
On Thu, Dec 13, 2001 at 12:47:35PM -0800, Debian WWW CVS wrote:
CVSROOT: /cvs/webwml
Module name: webwml
Changes by: danish 01/12/13 12:47:35
webwml/danish/international/l10n/data
Update of /cvs/webwml/webwml/danish/international/l10n/data
In directory
On Thu, Dec 13, 2001 at 11:50:38AM -0800, Randolph Chung wrote:
Is it just me, or did the link to http://www.debian.org/ports disappear
from the main page? Any reason for this?
http://lists.debian.org/debian-www/2001/debian-www-200112/msg00011.html
Josip, and the rest of the debian
On Thu, 13 Dec 2001 22:08:50 +0100, Denis Barbier wrote:
Directory /cvs/webwml/webwml/danish/international/l10n/data added to the
repository
this directory is useless.
I can't seem to get rid of it; while both it and scripts was removed
from my local cvs tree and neither won't come back when
On Thu, Dec 13, 2001 at 10:25:20PM +0100, Kaare Olsen wrote:
On Thu, 13 Dec 2001 22:08:50 +0100, Denis Barbier wrote:
Directory /cvs/webwml/webwml/danish/international/l10n/data added to the
repository
this directory is useless.
I can't seem to get rid of it; while both it and
On Thu, Dec 13, 2001 at 12:06:41PM -0800, Grant Bowman wrote:
I agree, this shouldn't be done haphazardly. I was trying to get a more
concrete suggestion worked out about the content before moving on
through the process and bringing it to this list. I think it's great if
both lists
On Thu, Dec 13, 2001 at 10:25:20PM +0100, Kaare Olsen wrote:
On Thu, 13 Dec 2001 22:08:50 +0100, Denis Barbier wrote:
Directory /cvs/webwml/webwml/danish/international/l10n/data added to the
repository
this directory is useless.
I can't seem to get rid of it; while both it and
On Wed, Dec 12, 2001 at 11:06:33AM -0500, Jeff Albro wrote:
This page is easy to read, easy to scan, and accomplishes its mission.
It's great! All I have for you is a few nitpicky improvements.
I'm glad you like it. It's basically a copy of the CD vendors page.
I don't believe you need the
On Thu, Dec 13, 2001 at 06:04:20PM -0500, James A. Treacy wrote:
I really meant to push the point of keeping the ports link when your first
removed it. I guess my lone comment wasn't strong enough. :)
On Thu, Dec 13, 2001 at 10:16:00PM +0100, Josip Rodin wrote:
(Before you complain, I
On Thu, Dec 13, 2001 at 06:43:38PM -0800, Grant Bowman wrote:
* James A. Treacy [EMAIL PROTECTED] [011213 18:27]:
On Thu, Dec 13, 2001 at 06:35:06PM -0700, Chris Tillman wrote:
The term 'Ports' itself is in effect an i386-ism. Supported
Architectures is much more descriptive to
15 matches
Mail list logo
