On Thu, Sep 11, 2003 at 05:52:13PM +0200, Martin Quinson wrote:
On Thu, Sep 11, 2003 at 10:56:28AM +0200, Gerfried Fuchs wrote:
Hi!
Something did go wrong with the recent changs to the l10n pages. They
produce tons of output in the tidy/validate analyses[1]. From what I can
On Fri, Sep 12, 2003 at 08:45:57AM +0200, Martin Quinson wrote:
But, Denis, you forgot to remove the offending parts of the DB, so that
those packages are rescaned.
Forget it. Of course you did not miss that point. I did not check well...
Sorry, Mt.
--
Ian Fleming was a UNIX fan! How do I
On Fri, Sep 12, 2003 at 09:10:26AM +0200, Martin Quinson wrote:
On Fri, Sep 12, 2003 at 08:45:57AM +0200, Martin Quinson wrote:
But, Denis, you forgot to remove the offending parts of the DB, so that
those packages are rescaned.
Forget it. Of course you did not miss that point. I did not
* Martin Quinson [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2003-09-12 08:45]:
Where are the build log, again, so that I can check my stupidity of the day?
If you haven't found them yet, they are linked from the
/devel/website/desc page (easier to remember :) and are here:
http://www-master.debian.org/build-logs/,
On Fri, Sep 12, 2003 at 08:45:57AM +0200, Martin Quinson wrote:
[...]
It looks like there is another problem on those web pages, since they where
not built yesterday. It matches my lastest commit to ease the navigation
about errors in template files...
Looks like they have been built now,
On Fri, Sep 12, 2003 at 10:29:01AM +0200, Denis Barbier wrote:
On Fri, Sep 12, 2003 at 08:45:57AM +0200, Martin Quinson wrote:
[...]
It looks like there is another problem on those web pages, since they where
not built yesterday. It matches my lastest commit to ease the navigation
about
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
□━□
【重要】このメールは規定通りに登録されているメールアドレスへ送信している
メルマガです。登録されているアドレスについては、下の方をご覧ください。
※購読解除 ⇒ http://banner.peeps.jp/
このメールに返信しても解除されませんのでご注意下さい。
□━□
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
【アダルトキャンディー】
☆風俗店超格安ホームページ製作☆
┌──
Your message dated Fri, 12 Sep 2003 17:15:34 +0200
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Will close it because unreproducible
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now
tags 208513 pending
thanks
Hi.
Regarding the bug, that
http://packages.debian.org/stable/devel/gcc-2.95.html
shows a Source not found message despite the fact that there is of
course the source code available:
The problem seems to be that the current scripts doesn't handle a
versioned Source:
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
tags 208513 pending
Bug#208513: gcc 2.95.4 source has disappeared
There were no tags set.
Tags added: pending
thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian
Hi.
I just read devel/wnpp/index and found it somewhat confusing.
I prepared a patch that adds a toc and makes some layout
changes.
Objections? (Yeah, I know this looks lika a pain for translators but I
can commit as much as possible for each translation so they
have only to add the toc part.)
So, we've now got bug ownership in the BTS, and it occurs that we could
use this productively to improve the way wnpp bugs are managed. Up to
now, when people accept an RFP or an RFA/O by retitling it to an ITP
or an ITA respectively, sometimes they change the submitter address and
sometimes they
12 matches
Mail list logo
