Who's using Debian?

2003-09-26 Thread Ricardo Yanez
Name of organization: Departamento de Fisica, Universidad de Chile, Chile Organization type: Educational Home page link: http://fisica.ciencias.uchile.cl Text: Some members of our Department started using Debian in 1997 and after a few years of experience, Debian became the official operative

Re: Change of e-mail address

2003-09-26 Thread Colin Watson
On Fri, Sep 26, 2003 at 01:43:22PM +0200, Axel Schlicht wrote: > What is the easiest way to change my e-mail address on all the lists I > am subscribed to (I read quite a lot of them). > I am convinced there must be a much easier way than to unsubscribe under > the old address and subscribe again

Re: Some (layout) improvements for devel/wnpp/index

2003-09-26 Thread Martin Quinson
On Thu, Sep 25, 2003 at 03:49:32PM +0200, Frank Lichtenheld wrote: > On Fri, Sep 12, 2003 at 08:40:58PM +0200, Frank Lichtenheld wrote: > > I just read devel/wnpp/index and found it somewhat confusing. > > I prepared a patch that adds a toc and makes some layout > > changes. > > > > Objections? (Y

Bug#212843: www.debian.org: please remove patent protest

2003-09-26 Thread martin f krafft
Package: www.debian.org Version: unavailable; reported 2003-09-26 Severity: wishlist The decision on logic patents in Europe has been made, and while there is still work to do, I think we won enough to be able to end the protest. Or do you believe differently? I am simply filing a bug to alert yo

Change of e-mail address

2003-09-26 Thread Axel Schlicht
Hi fellow Linux users. For the last couple of days I (or rather may mailbox) have been flooded with SPAM, SPAM, SPAM, averaging to over 1000 emails per day. Lately with the arrival of anoter stupid Windoze virus / worm those messages show an annoying tendency to get bigger and bigger, the aver

Re: Software patents in EU.

2003-09-26 Thread Bartosz Fenski aka fEnIo
On Thu, Sep 25, 2003 at 04:47:37PM +0200, Josip Rodin wrote: > > To be onest, I don't know what you meant. Are you talking about another > > voting in the future because of internal inconsistens in the voted > > proposal? > > I'll be thankful if you rewrote your sentence more verbose ;) > I mean,