Re: ports/arm/index.wml: Bdale Garbee isn't DPL anymore

On Wed, Mar 24, 2004 at 02:11:15PM +0100, Florian Ernst wrote: > Hello there! > > Subject says it all, the attached patch fixes it. > > Cheers, > Flo > Index: ports/arm/index.wml > === > RCS file: /cvs/webwml/webwml/english/ports/ar

Processed: reassign 232323 to lists.debian.org

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > # this pages are created by the list admins > reassign 232323 lists.debian.org Bug#232323: "broken" images below http://murphy.debian.org/lists/ Bug reassigned from package `www.debian.org' to `lists.debian.org'. > End of message, stopping processing

Processed: reassign 232467 to listarchives

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > # I think mailinglist search engine bugs belong there > reassign 232467 listarchives Bug#232467: www.debian.org: mailing list search seems to miss some items Bug reassigned from package `www.debian.org' to `listarchives'. > End of message, stopping pr

Processed: reassign 218536 to listarchives

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > # I think mailinglist search engine bugs belong there > reassign 218536 listarchives Bug#218536: www.debian.org: Mailing list search engine can't search for numbers Bug reassigned from package `www.debian.org' to `listarchives'. > End of message, stop

Re: Who's using Debian?

On Tue, 23 Mar 2004 10:25:40 +0100 Freddy Spierenburg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Organization: SYSTEMS-IS, Telegraaf Media ICT, Netherlands The site will be added to the "Who's using Debian" page shortly. I took the liberty to modify the second paragraf slightly to use "our" and "we" instead o

Re: Who's using Debian?

On Mon, 22 Mar 2004 18:26:20 -0300 "Diego" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > NI, Núcleo de Informática, Brasil The site will be added to the "Who's using Debian" page shortly. Thanks for your support! -- Regards, Kaare -

Re: Proposal: Document reasons for unpackeable software

Frank Lichtenheld wrote: > [CCed [EMAIL PROTECTED], see below] > > On Wed, Mar 24, 2004 at 10:03:25AM +0100, Martin Schulze wrote: > > we should probably list the reasons why software cannot be packaged > > for Debian and distributed on .debian.org hosts on the proper page[1]. > > Most of the time

Re: Proposal: Document reasons for unpackeable software

* Frank Lichtenheld ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [040324 15:40]: > On Wed, Mar 24, 2004 at 10:03:25AM +0100, Martin Schulze wrote: > > we should probably list the reasons why software cannot be packaged > > for Debian and distributed on .debian.org hosts on the proper page[1]. > > Most of the times this is

Re: http://ftp-master.debian.org/queue-new/ undocumented [was: Re: Moving erlang-slang from non-US to main]

On Wed, Mar 24, 2004 at 03:15:16PM +0100, Emanuele Rocca wrote: > Hi, > > * On 24-03-04 - 14:44, Frank Lichtenheld <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > you could've found out that also by yourself by checking > > http://ftp-master.debian.org/queue-new/ which seems to be unlinked, > > undocumented an

Re: Proposal: Document reasons for unpackeable software

[CCed [EMAIL PROTECTED], see below] On Wed, Mar 24, 2004 at 10:03:25AM +0100, Martin Schulze wrote: > we should probably list the reasons why software cannot be packaged > for Debian and distributed on .debian.org hosts on the proper page[1]. > Most of the times this is the result of a (rather lon

http://ftp-master.debian.org/queue-new/ undocumented [was: Re: Moving erlang-slang from non-US to main]

Hi, * On 24-03-04 - 14:44, Frank Lichtenheld <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > you could've found out that also by yourself by checking > http://ftp-master.debian.org/queue-new/ which seems to be unlinked, > undocumented and unknown... I think that this resource should be documented, maybe under

ports/arm/index.wml: Bdale Garbee isn't DPL anymore

Hello there! Subject says it all, the attached patch fixes it. Cheers, Flo Index: ports/arm/index.wml === RCS file: /cvs/webwml/webwml/english/ports/arm/index.wml,v retrieving revision 1.55 diff -u -r1.55 index.wml --- ports/arm/inde

Re: link swapping

* Andre Lehovich <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2004-03-23 17:00]: > Requests for Debian to swap links with other organizations > seem to be a regular thing. (Another one just came through > today). The usual answer seems to be no. Does Debian have > a formal policy on this? Our page is ranked through c

Proposal: Document reasons for unpackeable software

Hi, we should probably list the reasons why software cannot be packaged for Debian and distributed on .debian.org hosts on the proper page[1]. Most of the times this is the result of a (rather long) discussion on debian-legal. A summary would help people understand the problems with packaging. F