On Thu, Apr 20, 2006 at 01:03:19AM +0200, Francesco Poli wrote:
> I agree that the GNU GPL v2 would be a perfectly reasonable choice for
> the Debian website.
> Several other GPLv2-compatible licenses are good choices too, however.
I'd rather use a simpler license for text content it is more under
On Thu, Apr 20, 2006 at 12:56:57AM +0200, Francesco Poli wrote:
> >
> >I suggest using a BSD-style license. The attached license is such a
> >license. It is based on the FreeBSD documentation license [3] and
> >explicitely mentions translations. In our case (the website) the
> >'
On Wed, 19 Apr 2006 13:12:16 +0200 Javier Fernández-Sanguino Peña wrote:
>
> Hi everyone,
>
> I was reviewing the status of #238245 ("Debian web site is licensed
> under the OPL which is not considered DFSG-free") and see that there
> have been no actions since October last year and no discussio
On Wed, 19 Apr 2006 08:09:15 -0500 Manoj Srivastava wrote:
> On 19 Apr 2006, Javier Fernández-Sanguino Peña uttered the following:
[...]
> >
> > a) a proper license should be decided for the website.
> >
> > I suggest using a BSD-style license. The attached license is such a
> > license. It is bas
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Am 19.04.2006 um 13:12 schrieb Javier Fernández-Sanguino Peña:
e) from here on access to the CVS of the website should be given after
clearly stating (and getting and agreement) that any and all
contributions
to the CVS, unless specified ot
in the recent news, the date is somewhat weird - afaik ISO compliant
date format doesn't involve 0th day of a month ;)
besides, the string that reads
This is the second update of Debian GNU/Linux 3.1 (codename ‘sarge$rsquo;)
in my opinion needs to be edited slightly. Yours truly,
-dp
--
To UNSU
Hi,
there are some errors on the debian news page (
http://www.debian.org/News/2006/20060419 ) for the r2 update.
First error:
April 0th, 2006
And in the first sentence:
Debian GNU/Linux 3.1 (codename ‘sarge$rsquo;)
Florian Sievers
--
http://www.dopehouse.dyndns.org
[EMAIL PROTECTED
Package: www.debian.org
Severity: normal
[as there's no wiki.debian.org pseudo package for the bts (yet?), I'm
filing this here.]
On wiki.debian.org, one can subscribe to a page to receive changes by
email. However, those emails lack a sane header to filter on (like
Mailinglist:, or X-Wiki-Updat
Package: www.debian.org
Severity: normal
[filing this against www.debian.org as this seems the closest fit]
wiki.debian.org lacks any contact info for technical problems, or
where to report bugs.
-- System Information:
Debian Release: testing/unstable
APT prefers unstable
APT policy: (500, '
Your message dated Wed, 19 Apr 2006 18:27:06 +0200
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#363510: www.debian.org: please indicate at /devel/people
that an asterisk means "comaintainer", if it does
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim
Hello,
I was browsing the Net when I came across your resource page
for Linux @ http://www.debian.org/misc/related_links
I am the co-ordinator for a page ( http://www.eit.in/sw/os/linux/research/linux_research.html
) that provides comprehensive web resources concerning research and
Hi,
Can some one please add this site to the require place.
Best Regards
On 14/03/06, Matt Kraai <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Mon, Mar 13, 2006 at 03:54:17PM -0300, Felipe Augusto van de Wiel (faw) wrote:> On 03/08/2006 01:40 PM, gg gg234 wrote:
> > Hi,> >> > In debian website this page
IMHO, it would be better to wait until wiki.d.o is DFSG-free, as I
expect readers would expect that from Debian's wiki.
That could take some time.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Package: www.debian.org
Severity: wishlist
File: http://debian.org/devel/people
Many names have an asterisk following their packages; apparently this
means that they are a comaintainer. Please document.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Con
Package: www.debian.org
Severity: wishlist
Hi!
IMHO it would be nice to list the year when the book was published /
last edited, not only to which distribution they apply, too.
e.g. the "Debian Anwender Handbuch" by Frank Ronneburg has been
re-edited and expanded at least one time since sarge h
Package: www.debian.org
Severity: normal
For example in http://www.us.debian.org/News/2006/20060419, there is a
link to http://packages.debian.org/xine-lib, which is broken since there
is no xine-lib binary package. It looks like adding stable/sources/ to
the correction and dsa tags in
webwml
On 19 Apr 2006, Javier Fernández-Sanguino Peña uttered the following:
> In summary: The web pages license content should be changed from the
> OPL (non DFSG-free) to some other license (DFSG-free). As it is, the
> current content is not GPL compatible (so it cannot be reused, for
> example, in doc
On 10 Apr 2006, Jens Seidel wrote:
> Hi Felipe,
>
> I added Manoj Srivastava to CC: because he has write access to the
> debian-policy CVS module
> (http://cvs.debian.org/debian-policy/?root=debian-policy). Since it
> is stored outside DDP (debian-doc module) I doubt that people from
> the DDP ha
Hi everyone,
I was reviewing the status of #238245 ("Debian web site is licensed under the
OPL which is not considered DFSG-free") and see that there have been no
actions since October last year and no discussion at debian-www.
In summary: The web pages license content should be changed from th
On your "Vendors of Debian CDs" page at
http://www.debian.org/CD/vendors/
under "United" States the please add the
following to my About Debian.com listing:
DVD Type: Official CD
On this same page under "United States"
the following links are bad:
GetLINUXnow.com - 404
LinuxDist - No CDs for
20 matches
Mail list logo
