Bug#339837: marked as done (http://www.debian.org/security/ seriously misleading about security infrastructure performance)

2006-04-22 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Sun, 23 Apr 2006 07:37:30 +0200 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Fixed in CVS has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reo

Bug#194549: Wait for DFSG-free wiki

2006-04-22 Thread Javier Fernández-Sanguino Peña
On Wed, Apr 19, 2006 at 11:00:27AM -0400, Filipus Klutiero wrote: > IMHO, it would be better to wait until wiki.d.o is DFSG-free, as I > expect readers would expect that from Debian's wiki. > That could take some time. IMHO (and since even the website's license is *not* DFSG-free, see #238245) Af

Bug#238245: Proposed plan (and license) for the webpage relicensing

2006-04-22 Thread Don Armstrong
To further underline what I have been saying, I object to any of my (currently embarrassingly minor) contributions to the Debian web page to be licensed under the terms of the proposed "Debian Free Documentation License" or any other license which has been specially drafted for the Debian web page

Re: Bug#238245: Proposed plan (and license) for the webpage relicensing

2006-04-22 Thread Javier Fernández-Sanguino Peña
On Sat, Apr 22, 2006 at 04:47:53PM +0200, Florian Weimer wrote: > * Javier Fernández-Sanguino Peña: > > > Copyright 1997-2006 Software in the Public Interest, Inc. All rights > > reserved. > > Is this correct? Have all contributors assigned copyright to SPI? Contributor assignment and the lice

Re: Bug#238245: Proposed plan (and license) for the webpage relicensing

2006-04-22 Thread Javier Fernández-Sanguino Peña
On Sat, Apr 22, 2006 at 06:40:11AM -0700, Don Armstrong wrote: > > The only change I made to it was substituting "FreeBSD Documentation > > Project" for "Debian Project". > > You've sent two totally different licenses to the list so far; I was > refering specifically to the license which was attac

Bug#364309: www.debian.org: Languages names have inconsistent capitalization

2006-04-22 Thread Richard Atterer
On Sat, Apr 22, 2006 at 01:17:27PM -0300, Damián Viano wrote: > It would be nice if this gets consistent. As I understand it, the capitalization is the correct one when writing the language name in that particular language. In some languages, language names are always spelled with a capita

Bug#364309: marked as done (www.debian.org: Languages names have inconsistent capitalization)

2006-04-22 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Sat, 22 Apr 2006 18:37:45 +0200 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#364309: www.debian.org: Languages names have inconsistent capitalization has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt w

Bug#364312: www.debian.org: new packages.d.o/changelog:$PACKAGE doesn't work with libraries

2006-04-22 Thread Damián Viano
Package: www.debian.org Severity: normal I love this feature, but found that libraries should get special treatment, currently http://packages.debian.org/changelog:libcaca-dev gets translated to: http://packages.debian.org/changelogs/pool/main/l/libcaca/current/changelog but it should get tra

Bug#364309: www.debian.org: Languages names have inconsistent capitalization

2006-04-22 Thread Damián Viano
Package: www.debian.org Severity: minor Tags: l10n It would be nice if this gets consistent. (Arabiya) Български (Bəlgarski) català česky dansk Deutsch Ελληνικά (Ellinika) español Esperanto français 한국어 (Hangul) Հայերեն (hayeren) Italiano magyar Nederlands 日本語 (Nihongo) p

TEORIA DO "11" - LEIAM ATE AO FIM

2006-04-22 Thread Carlos Gomes
Title: Salto copy         Assistência a informática e a Artes Gráficas   www.carlosgomes.web.pt       Caro amigo dá q pensar !Um abraçoSubject: A TEORIA DO "11" - LEIAM ATE AO FIMA conclusão do final merece-me alguma credibilidade.A TEORIA DO "11">O 11 passou a ser

Bug#238245: Proposed plan (and license) for the webpage relicensing

2006-04-22 Thread Florian Weimer
* Javier Fernández-Sanguino Peña: > Copyright 1997-2006 Software in the Public Interest, Inc. All rights reserved. Is this correct? Have all contributors assigned copyright to SPI? >2. Redistributions in compiled form (transformed to other DTDs, converted >to HTML, PDF, PostScript, RTF

Bug#238245: Proposed plan (and license) for the webpage relicensing

2006-04-22 Thread Don Armstrong
On Sat, 22 Apr 2006, Javier Fernández-Sanguino Peña wrote: > On Thu, Apr 20, 2006 at 03:48:09PM -0700, Don Armstrong wrote: > > Should we decide to change the license, we should either use the MIT > > license if we don't want it to be copyleft, or the GPL if we do. A > > custom license is not somet

New Vendor Listing - UK

2006-04-22 Thread Kevin
Hello, We would like to be considered for addition to the Debian Vendors list for the UK. Our Details as per instructions are as follows: Vendor Name: LinuxDist URL: http://www.linuxdist.co.uk/shop Sales Donated: 20% of full sale excluding shipping Type of CD: "A" Grade CD/DVD's using Off