On Thu, Apr 12, 2007 at 11:19:24AM +0200, Richard Atterer wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 12, 2007 at 08:51:26AM +1000, Craig Small wrote:
> > I did think it was strange noone was changing their CD vendor details
> > and all you lot are quiet.
> >
> > Anyhow, I'm back! Has anyone been updating the CD vendor
On Wed, Apr 11, 2007 at 03:56:52PM -0600, Debian WWW CVS wrote:
> CVSROOT: /cvs/webwml
> Module name: webwml
> Changes by: joy 07/04/11 15:56:52
>
> Added files:
> english/CD/vendors: adding-form.wml
>
> Log message:
> added an actual form for CD vendor submissions, hopin
Hi,
Thanks for taking the time for this!
On Fri, 2007-04-13 at 18:42:45 +0300, Yavor Doganov wrote:
> Package: www.debian.org
> Severity: important
> Tags: patch
> [(X-Debbugs-)CCing the porters' list]
>ยท
> The Debian GNU/kNetBSD port is referred incorrectly as "GNU/NetBSD".
> I assume this mist
Package: www.debian.org
Severity: important
Tags: patch
[(X-Debbugs-)CCing the porters' list]
The Debian GNU/kNetBSD port is referred incorrectly as "GNU/NetBSD".
I assume this mistake was not intentional and the pages just haven't
been updated for a while. By contrast, this is not the case with
On Thu, Apr 12, 2007 at 08:38:11PM -0700, Don Armstrong wrote:
> I think that I'm not the only one who really dislikes using CVS; has
> any thought been made to switching away from CVS to something else
> (anything else?)[1]
I would see a real benefit in moving away from CVS. Even if it
works righ
Your message dated Fri, 13 Apr 2007 13:37:04 +0200
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#215430: chinese pages don't build on non-i386
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case
Don Armstrong <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I think that I'm not the only one who really dislikes using CVS; has
> any thought been made to switching away from CVS to something else
> (anything else?)[1]
Search the list archive.
I don't think there's a compelling reason to switch yet, but if there
Hi Jens,
We should maybe also consider graphical tools to access (and compare
revisions, ...) repositories. CVS is supported very well, also
subversion is supported by a few tools. I do most of the time work on
the command line but a few users may depend on such software.
I prefer grafical CV
On Fri, Apr 13, 2007 at 04:35:08PM +0900, Kobayashi Noritada wrote:
> I dislike CVS and prefer Subversion, but I have been thought that the
> very obstacle that prevents us from switching to other VCS is
> translation checks like '#use wml::debian::translation-check
> translation="1.75"'. Is it po
Hi,
From: Don Armstrong
Subject: Switching away from CVS
Date: Thu, 12 Apr 2007 20:38:11 -0700
> I think that I'm not the only one who really dislikes using CVS; has
> any thought been made to switching away from CVS to something else
> (anything else?)[1]
I dislike CVS and prefer Subversion, bu
Hi Don,
On Thu, Apr 12, 2007 at 08:38:11PM -0700, Don Armstrong wrote:
> I think that I'm not the only one who really dislikes using CVS; has
> any thought been made to switching away from CVS to something else
> (anything else?)[1]
>
> Perhaps a poll among those who actively commit to the reposi
11 matches
Mail list logo
