> Why would porting to a new version be “dangerous”?
The porting to Python3 will be great work. Also i prefer Python3 to Python2.
And the "dangerous" is, i wrote as "very hard work".
Sincerely, Byung-Hee.
ps. for some reason, my reply action is not good, though i'll try to best!
--
Still i'm
Hi,
Please keep the submitter in copy when replying on the BTS.
황병희 (2019-03-10):
> Well i'm not position to resolve it. However that is very very very
> dangerous i think. Anyhow, it is interesting PR, to me.
Why would porting to a new version be “dangerous”?
Cheers,
--
Cyril Brulebois
On Sun, Mar 10, 2019 at 01:23:47PM +0100, Holger Wansing wrote:
>Andreas Ronnquist wrote:
>>
>> Ah, I rushed the fix - should I change it back?
>
>Hmm, maybe the debian-boot list should be prompted for this? (since they
>could be considered responsible for this page)
>Or debian-cd, since they
Hi,
Andreas Ronnquist wrote:
> On Sat, 9 Mar 2019 19:09:41 +0100,
> Holger Wansing wrote:
>
> >Hi,
> >
> >積丹尼 Dan Jacobson wrote:
> >> Package: www.debian.org
> >>
> >> On https://www.debian.org/devel/debian-installer/
> >> After "Current daily snapshots" say
> >> "netinst multi-arch CD
X-Debbugs-Cc: Laura Arjona Reina
Package: www.debian.org
Severity: normal
Tags: l10n
https://www.debian.org/international/l10n/po4a/de.en.html states:
Packages already i18n-ed
These packages are translated in other languages, and then could be translated
into your own language.
Section: main
5 matches
Mail list logo
