reassign 828052 www.debian.org
retitle 828052 https://www.debian.org/ports: list of ports is outdated
Jeffrey Walton writes:
> According to the Debian Ports page at https://www.debian.org/ports/,
> Sparc is an official and supported.
That list seems outdated: sparc is no
On 05/01/2013 23:41, Simon Paillard wrote:
-- On dak side, is it possible to extract metadata for binary packages, under
$src/$binary_pkg/$version/changelog ?
Changelogs can differ between architectures so this would have to
include the architecture name as well. If we allow : we could use
Hi,
I plan to add source packages that are only referenced via Built-Using
to the Sources indices[1] so we include them on source CD images and
mirrors maintained with debmirror.
It might be useful to ignore these new packages and not show them on the
PTS, in UDD (rmadison) or packages.d.o. Most
Package: www.debian.org
Severity: normal
packages.d.o does not display any information about packages in
lenny-backports-sloppy. For example, only the unstable version of
postgresql-9.0 shows up on http://packages.debian.org/postgresql-9.0.
On the other hand packages from lenny-backports are
Package: www.debian.org
Hi,
Nicholas Bamber nicho...@periapt.co.uk writes:
I absolutely understand. It all makes sense to me. It's just sort of
frustrating that it has taken me so long to get this far and I am not
there yet. I wonder do you think you could get a link from
Hi,
The Debian Security FAQ says that the Debian testing security team
handles unembargoed issues (only)[1]. But since June, they do also
handle embargoed security issues[2].
It would be nice if the FAQ could be updated.
Regards,
Ansgar
[1] http://www.debian.org/security/faq#testing
[2]
6 matches
Mail list logo