Re: lists.debian.org de-localization

2003-01-06 Thread Edmund GRIMLEY EVANS
Tomohiro KUBOTA [EMAIL PROTECTED]: The key point is that when we receive a mail with raw 8bit characters, we don't have an easy and relyable method to tell the characters are from ISO-8859-1 or KOI8-R or other character sets. If the headers contain 8-bit octets and are valid as UTF-8, it's

Re: slang, boot-floppies, and wide character support

2001-03-28 Thread Edmund GRIMLEY EVANS
Adam Di Carlo [EMAIL PROTECTED]: I have a patch from the boot-floppies archives to give slang wide character support. I've attached that patch. Since making slang-1.4.0-ege5.diff I have fixed at least one bug and ported the patch to slang-1.4.2, I think. I shall try to produce an up-to-date

Re: slang, boot-floppies, and wide character support

2001-03-28 Thread Edmund GRIMLEY EVANS
Adam Di Carlo [EMAIL PROTECTED]: You seem to be avoiding the question here -- patch slang1, use slang1-ja, or make a new slang1-wide package with these patches? It's hardly feasible to make a version of slang1 that works in UTF-8 and is bug-free and binary-compatible with ordinary slang1.

Re: slang, boot-floppies, and wide character support

2001-03-28 Thread Edmund GRIMLEY EVANS
I shall try to produce an up-to-date slang-1.4.4-ege.diff soon. http://www.rano.org/mutt/slang-1.4.4-ege2.diff.gz Edmund

Re: slang, boot-floppies, and wide character support

2001-03-28 Thread Edmund GRIMLEY EVANS
Adam Di Carlo [EMAIL PROTECTED]: Do you have a check list of the programs that will be linked against slang in boot-floppies? No, sorry. I just tried ldd on all the executable files in http://http.us.debian.org/debian/dists/potato/main/disks-i386/current/images-1.44/root.bin The ones