Re: moving packages.d.o to klecker

On Tue, 6 Feb 2001, James A. Treacy wrote: > Do you have any more information on the pools db? One thing > that really needs to be fixed is how we provide access to > copyright, changelog (both debian and upstream) and file > listings for packages. Perhaps the db could carry this > information.

Re: moving packages.d.o to klecker

On Tue, 6 Feb 2001, James A. Treacy wrote: > Are there any reasons we shouldn't move packages.d.o over to > klecker? klecker is a much faster machine and I believe it > has better bandwidth. It seems to me auric would be a better choice. Of course the reason to do that is to integrate it with th

Re: packages.debian.org does not honor pools

On Sun, 14 Jan 2001, Josip Rodin wrote: > Er, what? If the links are wrong, it's most probably due to the fact mirror > on the machine (master) is outdated. That mirror is no longer running, and cannot be made to run. You will have to make the web pages not rely on a local mirror. Jason

Re: Fw: Re: Problems when indexing the lists.debian.org site

On Mon, 8 Jan 2001, Cesar Mendoza wrote: > The problem was that every time googlebot went to index lists.debian.org > the server went down and it have to be rebooted. So, googlebot was > denied access to aboid this problem. As I said, I only recall a problem with the BTS, not the mailing list,

Re: Fw: Re: Problems when indexing the lists.debian.org site

On Mon, 8 Jan 2001, Cesar Mendoza wrote: > So, shall we lift the embargo to Googlebot on lists.debian.org? Er, why exactly does lists.d.o have a problem with google? There is no CGI there, is there? I thought the problem was with the BTS. Jason

Re: Do not use links to developer pages other than people.d.o/~user

On Wed, 13 Dec 2000, James A. Treacy wrote: > BTW, all the /public_html directories on people.d.o > are backed up. No quite yet, but soon I hope. Jason

Re: update of the security page

On Fri, 8 Dec 2000, Michael Stone wrote: > There has always been a valid reason for changing it. The last one > (slink->potato) was to split the single archive directory into > main,contrib,non-free. There are no further changes planned, but changes So? That change was made for non-technical rea

Re: update of the security page

On Fri, 8 Dec 2000, Michael Stone wrote: > The apt line is what I'm talking about. The structure of the security > site has changed for every release, and apt lines have not been If you want to keep it constant then commit to not changing it. There isn't any reason at all that you should have to

Re: Bug#78009: www.debian.org: Having problems accessing from US

On Sat, 25 Nov 2000, Gordon Sadler wrote: > Have a weird feeling this might be something on my end seeing how noone > else has reported this, but for approximately the last week I have had > very little success with connecting to www.debian.org. Sounds like a proxy has got confused klecker does

Re: klecker.debian.org

On Wed, 25 Oct 2000, James A. Treacy wrote: > (*)Retrieving the files from .debs is a pain/inefficient due to the following > issues: > - grabbing files from a .deb involves ar and at least one tar (usually two). I have a library that is about a magnitude faster than the ar/tar combination and

Re: www.debian.org is now klecker.debian.org

On 23 Oct 2000, Thomas Bushnell, BSG wrote: > > If you have something very very important and irreplacable you may ask > > Joey Hess to try and recover it for you.. > Does this mean that backups were not part of the regular > administration of the machine? It's reasonable for some applications

Re: Chinese webpage has broken

On Tue, 24 Oct 2000, Josip Rodin wrote: > Admins, please synchronize the main Apache configuration files on > klecker.d.o with the ones from master.d.o. Er.. no.. Please put any settings you need in the apache.conf for the web site. I don't want to have to repeat this if we ever move things arou

Re: klecker.d.o rules! :)

On Fri, 20 Oct 2000, Joey Hess wrote: > > That's 36 minutes -- for rebuilding the whole site plus running > > touch_translations.pl on english pages. Simply fantastic! :) > Excellent. Can we have hourly builds now? See if VA will donate a second CPU and I don't see why not.. AFAIK that board i

people.debian.org

Given the recent VA crash and the resulting problems with people's personal web pages I have created 'people.debian.org' which will exclusively be used for individual web pages. The usual common entry points (debian.org and www.debian.org) have been resetup to be redirects to this domain, and in

Re: www.debian.org is now klecker.debian.org

On Mon, 23 Oct 2000, Roland Bauerschmidt wrote: > > Only debwww group right now, but it should be open for all developers > > shortly. Again, ask the admins. > > While we are at it: What is with the old home directories from va.d.o? > Have they all been recovered? Or only on request? If you hav

Re: klecker.debian.org

On Sun, 22 Oct 2000, James A. Treacy wrote: > I can easily convert the Packages interface to use an apt-cache so having > a mirror just for that isn't important. The Contents files can also be > easily copied (used for searching for which package(s) contain a file). I wouldn't bother really.. I

Re: klecker.debian.org

On Sat, 21 Oct 2000, Josip Rodin wrote: > lists archives and bugs pages aren't an issue -- they're both rather > independent of the main site now. Right, OK.. > I was talking to elmo and shaleh on IRC about klecker having a FTP mirror > the other day. I suggested remotely mounting download.sou

Re: klecker.debian.org

On Fri, 20 Oct 2000, Josip Rodin wrote: > But the plan was to have everything related to web pages on one host, and > the upgrade to va was supposed to enable that. Now that it happened there's > no need to have the web pages build on master anymore, klecker can do it. Oh? Really? Hum, I didn't

Re: klecker.debian.org

On Fri, 20 Oct 2000, Josip Rodin wrote: > but considering klecker.d.o could need the FTP mirror anyway, it's best to > get it set up right away. *blink* Are you confused? We are not trying to move any more to klecker than was on va before. There was no mirror there before, and there isn't going

klecker.debian.org

The new va.debian.org replacement box is installed and running, mostly. The mailsystem is not active and only the web team can login right now, but that won't last too long. I would like the web team to prepare it to resume it's duty as www.debian.org ASAP. Please get everything you need mirrored

Site sponsor

Could the site sponsor link on www.d.o please point to www.brainfood.com while we are there? Thanks, Jason

Re: Non-free Proposal

On Tue, 26 Sep 2000, Josip Rodin wrote: > The alias www.debian.org/Lists-Archives -> lists.debian.org in the apache > configuration on master is missing, that's all. No, it isn't.. What else could it be? Jason

Re: anonymous CVS not working in webwml, and how it was fixed

On Wed, 27 Sep 2000, Josip Rodin wrote: > The pserver password file listed "anonymous:69S/nLyi1wYKc:jgg", and jgg > doesn't seem to be in webwml group. So I got that changed in CVS to treacy[1], > but the changes wouldn't propagate on auric :/ I manually changed the file, > and it's working now.

Re: cvs.debian.org?

On Sun, 24 Sep 2000, peter karlsson wrote: > Well, hopefully it will be back up soon, I have some major improvements > to check in to the CVS :-) It will be back monday evening I hope on a different machine, I'm waiting for Joey Hess to exaime the dead drive and see if he can extract anything fr

VA downtime

VA.d.o will be having a full day worth of downtime while they move offices. This is going to be this friday. I would like it very much if master.d.o could be configured to serve the web site for that period. If someone from debian-www could arrange this that would be good - let me know if you ne

CGIs

Master is running potato now. The perl upgrade has foobar'd many web cgi's for some reason.. Randolph is working on the ones we detect, but someone must make sure these changes get where they belong. Thanks, Jason

Re: lists.debian.org not updating some lists

On Wed, 9 Aug 2000, James A. Treacy wrote: > (*)You might be wondering why we don't simply have one machine that hosts > www.d.o, is where the daily updates are done, functions as the mirror > server and hosts cgi.d.o? Good question. Having everything on one machine > would greatly simplify many

Re: SPI pages not broken [was Re: various breakage]

On Tue, 8 Aug 2000, James A. Treacy wrote: > I tried every link on the front page and they all worked. > www.spi-inc.org resolves to 198.186.203.20 for me. taupe{jgg}~#host www.spi-inc.org www.spi-inc.org A 198.186.203.20 taupe{jgg}~#host spi-inc.org spi-inc.org A

Re: Machines lost?

On Fri, 28 Jul 2000, James A. Treacy wrote: > I'm removing those out of date translations. It is quite easy to add > http redirects to an apache server. The problem is we only have control > over www.debian.org, not the other mirrors, so is only partially effective. Can't you use .htaccess? Jas

Re: security.d.o webpage

On Mon, 24 Jul 2000, Josip Rodin wrote: > machine (obviously), and the main website should be both (I guess all those > apache's swallow lots of resources). But I don't think we have any available Not really, va has almost no load at all. We aren't using CGIs much remember. Jason

Re: view cvs on VA

On Mon, 24 Jul 2000, Josip Rodin wrote: > If possible, I'd like two things back from old cvsweb behaviour: directory > listings should be sorted per age (recently added entries listed first), and > that unified diffs are shown by default, since colored diffs don't look good > in text-only browser

Re: view cvs on VA

On Mon, 24 Jul 2000, Josip Rodin wrote: > If possible, I'd like two things back from old cvsweb behaviour: directory > listings should be sorted per age (recently added entries listed first), and > that unified diffs are shown by default, since colored diffs don't look good > in text-only browser

Re: security.d.o webpage

On Sun, 23 Jul 2000, James A. Treacy wrote: > > It seems to me that it a much better idea to just fix the main web site so > > that it doesn't have a huge latency. Pushing our 'fast' content out to > > other boxes because of that problem seems like a cheap hack. > What I'd really like is to have

Re: security.d.o webpage

On Sun, 23 Jul 2000, James A. Treacy wrote: > I'll change the question to, how is security.d.o updated? > It's really the same question though since pandora.d.o == security.d.o > and there are web pages there. :) > > If the machine will be updated directly from cvs, then it will > be fine if eve

view cvs on VA

I've installed viewcvs on VA, you can access it with: http://va.debian.org/cgi-bin/viewcvs.cgi It seems to work correctly, and can work with read-only repositories. If there are no problems I will purge cvsweb and make viewcvs respond for cvs.debian.org My quick tests seem to show two problems,

Re: Incoming mirror lists @ www.d.o

Yes, the web site should not mention incoming mirrors anymore, but contain a reference to incoming.debian.org. Web people, can you update? On Tue, 20 Jun 2000, Nathan E Norman wrote: > www.d.o says incoming mirrors still exist: > > http://www.debian.org/devel/incoming_mirrors > > However, I

request for push-mirroring (fwd)

Would someone please update this portion of the web site to make it very clear that push mirrors are 'invitation only', there is a very limited number of slots fo this kind of thing, not everyone can get one. Jason -- Forwarded message -- Date: Tue, 20 Jun 2000 16:12:46 +0200 Fro

Re: Loss of Archive

On Tue, 16 May 2000, Darren O. Benham wrote: > What is going to happen to the release pages (doesn't some of the links > count on the archive being present?) All external links should point to http://ftp.debian.org/debian/... or http.us.debian.org. I have been keeping the mirror up-to-date but

Re: [nm-admin] NM website has moved!

On Mon, 15 May 2000, Craig Small wrote: > Does pandora get backed up? No. Jason

Re: forcing web site mirror

On Fri, 28 Apr 2000, Darren O. Benham wrote: > That was dinstall's user and the web run was made part of dinstall :( It is moved in the LDAP stuff since most of the machines have this user. master{jgg}~#id archvsync uid=1176(archvsync) gid=1176(archvsync) groups=803(debwww) master{jgg}~#ls -l ~

Re: Using database driven pages

On Wed, 26 Apr 2000, Craig Small wrote: > On Tue, Apr 25, 2000 at 08:26:51PM -0400, James A. Treacy wrote: > > This would be a good test of how well dynamic pages will work with our site. > > We can easily revert if we need to. My vote is to go for it. > A home for this sort of stuff does not ne

Re: Problem in the CVSweb script

On Tue, 28 Mar 2000, James A. Treacy wrote: > BTW, I don't believe anyone has approached upstream about this problem. > Perhaps > they can suggest or implement a solution for us. The recommended solution is to do what joey said, it is just really ugly :< Jason

Re: Problem in the CVSweb script

On Tue, 28 Mar 2000, Javier Fdz-Sanguino Pen~a wrote: > - (most complicated but best) make cvsweb.conf use a pserver > access (as anonymous no r/w access is needed IIRC). Is this even possible? Jason

Re: Bug#61144: www.debian.org: connection problems using apt-get and apt-move

On Mon, 27 Mar 2000, Lazarus Long wrote: > Package: www.debian.org > Version: 2327 > Severity: important > > Err http://http.us.debian.org potato/main Sources > Connection failed > > The above has been typical recently. Sounds like someone is behind a transparent web proxy, I suggest you

Re: New Search Engine?

On Thu, 16 Mar 2000, Michael Stone wrote: > On Thu, Mar 16, 2000 at 08:35:24PM -0800, Darren O. Benham wrote: > > [22:31]:~> df > We're back to this again? I'll give you a drive if you really need it. > (But I thought the disk space issue was resolved, or at least that > people with more money

Re: New Search Engine?

On Sat, 18 Mar 2000, Craig Small wrote: > No, first we check it does the job, then we worry about that. Yes, please try it on one of your private systems and make sure it generates the sort of output and can handle the size properly. > I believe the website without lists or bugs is about 490 M

Re: More SPI fun

On Thu, 3 Feb 2000, James A. Treacy wrote: > > That's why I'm getting these errors and possibly you're not. > > Have we got an old version of SPI hiding somewhere? > The DNS for va changed about a month ago. I'm amazed that > someone would have the old value cached this long. Not quite, samosa

Re: Why Debian's webpages aren't DFGS-free ?

On Wed, 2 Feb 2000, Joey Hess wrote: > James A. Treacy wrote: > > I don't care about this issue (got too many things going on at once). Come > > to > > a consensus about what to do and someone do it. > > Well I hope _someone_ gives a damn about little things like our social > contract! Well, i

Re: Password in the DB (fwd)

Tue, 1 Feb 2000 20:34:09 +0100 (CET) From: Javier Fernandez-Sanguino Pen~a <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: Jason Gunthorpe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: Password in the DB Oops... sorry I did not see it. Thanks ¿How come there is not information

Mirror List?

Hi, Would anyone be willing to do some major maintinance on our mirror list? Some of the things needed are, * Change all country names to use ISO codes * Verify all the mirrors exist in the DNS and their information is correct, including checking if they have uncrecorded ftp/http/rsync

Re: Don't touch master's web space!!!

On Sat, 22 Jan 2000, Darren O. Benham wrote: > DO NOT run the update and all web updates have been disabled.. The > checked-out archive is being copied to a new disk. Debian admin will > inform us when everything is ok. Tada.. Just so you know, the rsync job to fix up the copy after 'cp -a' t

OOM Web Stuff

Hi all, Masters recent hard crashes have been caused by the Web WML Program forcing the machine to go OOM and die horribly. I have tracked this down to the exact wml causing this: master{treacy}/debian2/web/webwml/romanian/News/weekly#make cd . && wml -q -D CUR_YEAR=2000 -o UNDEFuRO:index.ro.ht

Re: Please don't write of MhonArc too soon.

On 19 Jan 2000, Jan Vroonhof wrote: > For instance geocrawler.com is awful if you want to come back two days > later and read just the new messages in some threads. The same holds Have you tried emailing the GeoCrawler people about this? Jason

List Archives thought

Here is a novel thought about the list archives.. There is a really nice site out there called geocrawler.com (a VA project like themes.org) whos sole purpose is to archive mailing lists - in particular they seem to focus on free software lists and projects. Already they index almost all of our

VA.debian.org runs LDAP now

Hi all, I spent the entire evening today converting VA to LDAP and cleaning out alot of cruft. In the process I had to renumber several of CVS repository group IDs, I hope this doesn't effect anything but if something goes funny, this might be why. There was some downtime on www user pages (~jgg

Alarming use of disk space

For some odd reason disk usage on master has sped up recently [we ate like 100 meg this past week or so!] - would it be possible for someone to .gz the mailing list archives for 1998. [soon :>] Thanks, Jason

Announcments?

Could someone put the last two announcments from debian-announce on the news section of the front page please? Thanks, Jason

Re: Debian-List HOWTO

On Mon, 8 Nov 1999, Martin Schulze wrote: > > Debian-List HOWTO [EMAIL PROTECTED] > November 8, 1999 Martin Schulze >

Re: Bug#49523: web-support for extracting GnuPG key

On Sun, 7 Nov 1999, Gregory T. Norris wrote: > We include support for extracting developer's PGP public keys using a > web-interface at . Now that we > have a non-beta version of GnuPG, and are making use of it throughout > the project, we should have a s

VA..

VA filled up it's 18G drive today I've purged the debian-archive directory [3.4G (.5G of hardlinks)] and set about copying it from saens to kubrick [which has an unused 8G disk] so we have at least 1 backup. There is a good chance the same procedure will have to be done to saens in a few months

Re: new developer's corner

On Sun, 19 Sep 1999, John Lapeyre wrote: > The web form says the format should be DDMMSS. Should this not > be DDDMMSS ? >Looks fun... Yes, you are correct. Jason

PGP Key accessor

9-08 Jason Gunthorpe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Key fingerprint = 64 BE 13 19 CC F6 D3 93 BF 87 FF 93 58 A6 D4 EE sig965C6A7D 1997-09-08 Johnie Ingram <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> sig 35261E21 1997-09-08 Jason Gunthorpe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> -BEGIN PGP PUBLIC KEY BLOCK- Versi

Re: new developer's corner

use. AUTHOR userdir-ldapwas written byJason Gunthorpe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>. userdir-ldap17 Sep 1999 4

Re: new developer's corner

On Wed, 15 Sep 1999, Adam Di Carlo wrote: > Cool. Should I add a seciton in the developers-reference encouraging > the use of it? Is it actually feeding other data sources? I'd wait on that for awhile more still.. Jason

Re: new developer's corner

On Tue, 14 Sep 1999, Joey Hess wrote: > Jason Gunthorpe wrote: > > Well, I have all the stuff, we just need to get a script that > > re-generates the xearth file from the DB and another script to do a one > > time import of the existing xearth file. > > Given how long

Re: new developer's corner

On 15 Sep 1999, Adam Di Carlo wrote: > > Jason Gunthorpe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > It looks like we can move this over to db.debian.org where it will be much > > more usefull with quite broad search capabilities. Hopefully by next week. > > Does this

Re: new developer's corner

On Wed, 15 Sep 1999, James A. Treacy wrote: > > Not Found > > The requested URL /devel/extract was not found on this server. > > > Should be http://cgi.debian.org/cgi-bin/pgp_key_extract.pl It looks like we can move this over to db.debian.org where it will be much more usefull with quite broad

Re: new developer's corner

On Tue, 14 Sep 1999, Darren O. Benham wrote: > > BTW whatever that is it may be somewhat overlapping with the search > > function on db.debian.org - perhaps they should be merged? > I don't know enough about the db.debian.org project, really. Is > there a faq? No, not yet. > > 3) Debian-Admi

Re: new developer's corner

On Tue, 14 Sep 1999, James A. Treacy wrote: > Just wanted to say that I like it. Good job. 1) Is it still mirroring? Not Found The requested URL /devel/extract was not found on this server. BTW whatever that is it may be somewhat overlapping with the search function on db.debian.org - perhaps t

New .ca server

Looks like www.ca.debian.org is toasted - does anyone know of any other .ca sites that are mirroring the web site? Jason

Re: Debian developer vacations

On Sat, 7 Aug 1999, Joseph Carter wrote: > Bad idea.. Some of us would rather not have this sort of info so > centralized about us---especially if it's available to non-developers. I > might let everyone here know that I'm going to be at LWE next week and For those that want to the LDAP databa

Re: Web Site Size

On Mon, 19 Jul 1999, Michael Stone wrote: > On Mon, Jul 19, 1999 at 11:52:41PM +0800, Andrew Howell wrote: > > We seem to get a small amount of traffic (70 meg a month) at > > www.au.debian.org but I'm quite happy mirroring everything. > > How much bw does it take to maintain the mirror? About

Re: Web Site Size

On Mon, 19 Jul 1999, Georg Hitsch wrote: > > I've never seen any utilization figures for any of our mirrors - I have an > > odd feeling they are not really that high.. > > The access-stats for www.at.debian.org are on: > http://www.at.debian.org/access/ 300Meg/month is around .1% of the traffic

Re: Web Site Size

On Sun, 18 Jul 1999, Darren O. Benham wrote: > List Archives (and Bugs, to some extent) are some of the heaviest hit > pages. Especially by our developers. If we stopped mirroring them, va's > load and bandwidth usage would shoot up. I've never seen any utilization figures for any of our mirro

Web Site Size

Hi all! If there is any way to reduce the size of the web site, please do it now :> We are running short of disk space on va.d.o, I can probably wrangle another gig of space, but a the rate it's been going down this will not last for very long. Thanks, Jason Debian Admin

Re: When an Official CD is not

On Thu, 15 Jul 1999, Craig Small wrote: > G'day All, > A quick trawl around http://www.debian.org/distrib/vendors finds some > CD entries like > CD Type: Official CD + non-free + vendor additions Couldn't these extensions be on a seperate disc? Jason

Re: Add more content to the Developer's Corner

On Sun, 20 Jun 1999, Josip Rodin wrote: > The vote link is there since ages ago... though db.debian.org isn't. > And when I lynx to that site, all I get is: > > Cannot open /etc/userdir-ldap.conf: No such file or directory > > Jason, can you fix that? Oops, all fixed Jason

Re: Installing package on pandora

> > P.S. pandora is listed as "stable" on http://www.debian.org/devel/machines; > > who should I report this to? Indeed.. Pandora, Samosa, and Faure are all running unstable these days, kubrick is some odd stable/unstable mix Jason

VA Research

Hi all, I was just browsing some files, and I noticed they still refered to VA Research as our sponsor. Can someone update the web pages to refer to them as VA Linux Systems please? Thanks, Jason

Re: website hasn't mirrored

On Wed, 9 Jun 1999, Joey Hess wrote: > Also, since I seem to run into this problem nearly every week when I try to > get Debian Weekly News up on the web site under a deadline, I'd really like > to have the ability to force a mirror myself. Who should I talk to? The best thing for this is to pro

Faq O Matic?

It seems some of the moderator addresses in the FOM are bouncing and va (rightly) refuses to deliver to the www-data address they are sent from.. I should redirect the [EMAIL PROTECTED] address, but where too? Jason

Re: Mirror-problems

On Wed, 3 Mar 1999, Georg Hitsch wrote: > I have with my mirror (www/ftp.at.debian.org) some problems with the > ftp-part. > > mirror.pl does some (wrong) symlinks, and so some files are not reachable: > > f.e.: > ftp://ftp.at.debian.org/debian/dists/sid/main/binary-sparc/base/update_1.3-2.1.de

Re: packages.debian.org

On Tue, 19 Jan 1999, Vincent Renardias wrote: > > One more feature (or a bugfix since it pointed to 404 before :) has > > been added: you can call http://packages.debian.org/some_package and > > it will redirect you to the search results on some_package. Jason > > Guntho

Re: bugs.debian.org

On Wed, 13 Jan 1999, Raul Miller wrote: > Jason Gunthorpe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > At Jonhie's suggestion I have added a rewriting rule for bugs.debian.org, > > the following URLs now act as expected: > > > > http://bugs.debian.org/ --> To main

bugs.debian.org

At Jonhie's suggestion I have added a rewriting rule for bugs.debian.org, the following URLs now act as expected: http://bugs.debian.org/ --> To main bugs page http://bugs.debian.org/apt --> To the bug pages for APT http://bugs.debian.org/ -> To the bug pages for any package lists.debian.org, pa

Re: Debian WWW CVS: treacy

On Wed, 23 Dec 1998, Martin Schulze wrote: > > The problem with the name on the mail started about 1-2 days before we first > > contacted you, Joey. Since nothing changed on our end we suspect that it > > is due to a change on the server. > > Hmm, did Jason install a newer version of CVS that be

RE: Debian WWW CVS: treacy

On Mon, 14 Dec 1998, Darren Benham wrote: > > On 14-Dec-98 Jason Gunthorpe wrote: > > > > On Mon, 14 Dec 1998, Darren Benham wrote: > > > >> Any idea why all cvs commits are being treated as if they come from Jay? > > > > Use the CVS_USER environ.

RE: Debian WWW CVS: treacy

On Mon, 14 Dec 1998, Darren Benham wrote: > Any idea why all cvs commits are being treated as if they come from Jay? Use the CVS_USER environ. Jason

stats.debian.org and mips machines

I did some DNS maint today. I created Job Bogan's MIPs machines under debian.net, redirected vote.debian.org into the main web space (along with packages and lists) and created stats.debian.org. stats has all the statistics data we collect, webalizer logs, mrtg graphs, etc. If someone would like

ftp urls and things

I just noticed the 'Installtion Instructions' is a url to ftp://ftp.debian.org Might I suggest that all such urls be changed to http://http.us.debian.org/debian// ? http.us.debian.org is the ftp archive array in the US. Using ftp.debian.org is bad, it's almost flooded and netscape is super

Contacts

Hmm, this page needs help: http://www.debian.org/devel/maintainer_contacts.html New Maintainers: afaik Igor is on leave Policy Manager: isn't this manoj? Sys Admin of master.debian.org: This should be [EMAIL PROTECTED] DNS Maintainer: this should be [EMAIL PROTECTED] and remove the reference

Space on master

Hi all, We have a problem. The total size of the web site and FTP archive is about to exceed 8 gig. This is beyond the capacity of their current disk and we don't have space to split them across two disks. I would advise that we try to reduce the size of the website and maybe look at ways to slo

Re: Content negotiation and expires..

On Thu, 15 Oct 1998, Martin Schulze wrote: > Perhaps the reason is that proxies don't care about the accepted languages? Hrm.. Sounds like a problem with the http spec.. Jason

Content negotiation and expires..

This is kinda bad, Wakko{root}/tmp#wget -S http://www.debian.org/ --18:07:03-- http://www.debian.org:80/ => `index.html.5' Connecting to www.debian.org:80... connected! HTTP request sent, fetching headers... 1 HTTP/1.1 200 OK 2 Date: Thu, 15 Oct 1998 00:07:07 GMT 3 Server: Apache/1.3.

Re: Better list archive search engine

On 22 Aug 1998, Guy Maor wrote: > I've fixed two problems: You can now search multiple dates, and the > engine will search all the relevant indexes. Also the script filters > out the header html so there aren't false matches on next and previous > emails when the hit is in the Subject. I was ju

Anon CVS

I took the CVS server down. The load is far to extreme right now. I suspect the announcement on slashdot about the new theme code might have something to do with it.. The load average peaked at 68 before I noticed and shut the mess down :< (some 58 cvs connections) There is a possiblity that I wi

Re: web page source available via CVS

On Wed, 8 Jul 1998 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > The web page source is available via CVS. > Currently you can only access the pages read-only > with anonymous access: > cvs -d :pserver:[EMAIL PROTECTED]:/cvs/webwml login > cvs -d :pserver:[EMAIL PROTECTED]:/cvs/webwml checkout webwml > I will b

Re: CVS

On Tue, 26 May 1998, [iso-8859-1] Nicolás Lichtmaier wrote: > > > Why aren't we using CVS to handle all our static pages? > > All the pages that are maintained by multiple people should > > already be using RCS. If people want to switch to CVS, that's > > fine by me. Personally, I found RCS to b

Re: Mirroring debian.org-local

On Sun, 24 May 1998, James A. Treacy wrote: > > rsync does not work ok in my opinion > > [and its very slow, too] > > > I found that rsync was not very fast when doing an initial mirror > (mirroring the ftp archive took about 20 hours), but is quite > fast after that. This is probably due to

Re: Mirroring debian.org-local

On Sun, 24 May 1998, Georg Hitsch wrote: > Since 5th May i cant mirror the debian.org-local tree, because > mirror.pl means "out of memory" (but i am using -F ) > > The Linux-Box has 128mb RAM inside > > Any suggestions? Use rsync. Where are you mirroring from? Jason -- To UNSUBSCRIBE

  1   2   >