Your message dated Thu, 24 Apr 2003 04:06:27 +0100
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#133127: Processed: including/excluding tags
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere. Please contact me immediately.)
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)
--------------------------------------
Received: (at maintonly) by bugs.debian.org; 9 Feb 2002 19:00:55 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sat Feb 09 13:00:55 2002
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from rwcrmhc54.attbi.com [216.148.227.87]
by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.12 1 (Debian))
id 16Zck3-0004X1-00; Sat, 09 Feb 2002 13:00:55 -0600
Received: from oink ([12.233.47.38]) by rwcrmhc54.attbi.com
(InterMail vM.4.01.03.27 201-229-121-127-20010626) with ESMTP
id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>;
Sat, 9 Feb 2002 19:00:24 +0000
Received: from dwhedon by oink with local (Exim 3.34 #1 (Debian))
id 16Zcdx-0000Jw-00; Sat, 09 Feb 2002 10:54:37 -0800
From: David Kimdon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Debian Bug Tracking System <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: debbugs: better segregation of 'wontfix' bugs
X-Reportbug-Version: 1.42
X-Mailer: reportbug 1.42
Date: Sat, 09 Feb 2002 10:54:36 -0800
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sender: David Kimdon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Package: debbugs
Version: N/A; reported 2002-02-09
Severity: wishlist
Hi,
It would be nice if it was easier to fileter out 'wontfix' bugs. For
example, on boot-floppies we have lots of won't fix bugs. Maybe we
should just close them . . .
Maybe the filters at http://www.debian.org/Bugs/ would allow one to
exclude or include based on tags?
Or maybe the default dislpay would segregate 'wontfix' bugs in the same
way that 'pending' bugs are segregated.
Thanks,
David
-- System Information
Debian Release: 3.0
Architecture: i386
Kernel: Linux oink 2.4.9 #1 Mon Sep 24 12:10:45 PDT 2001 i686
Locale: LANG=C, LC_CTYPE=C
---------------------------------------
Received: (at 133127-done) by bugs.debian.org; 24 Apr 2003 03:06:30 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed Apr 23 22:06:28 2003
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from einsteinium.btinternet.com [194.73.73.147]
by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.12 1 (Debian))
id 198X48-0007hL-00; Wed, 23 Apr 2003 22:06:28 -0500
Received: from host217-39-16-142.in-addr.btopenworld.com ([217.39.16.142]
helo=riva.lab.dotat.at)
by einsteinium.btinternet.com with esmtp (Exim 3.22 #23)
id 198X47-0007bK-00
for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Thu, 24 Apr 2003 04:06:27 +0100
Received: from cjwatson by riva.lab.dotat.at with local (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian))
for [EMAIL PROTECTED]
id 198X47-0004x0-00; Thu, 24 Apr 2003 04:06:27 +0100
Date: Thu, 24 Apr 2003 04:06:27 +0100
From: Colin Watson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Bug#133127: Processed: including/excluding tags
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
References: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> <[EMAIL
PROTECTED]> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> <[EMAIL
PROTECTED]>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.28i
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-25.5 required=4.0
tests=EMAIL_ATTRIBUTION,IN_REP_TO,QUOTED_EMAIL_TEXT,REFERENCES,
REPLY_WITH_QUOTES,USER_AGENT_MUTT
autolearn=ham version=2.53
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.53 (1.174.2.15-2003-03-30-exp)
On Wed, Apr 23, 2003 at 09:34:16PM +0200, Denis Barbier wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 23, 2003 at 07:27:49PM +0100, Colin Watson wrote:
> > I've convinced myself that the "status" and the tag are the same
> > thing, though, so:
>
> You can indeed start this way, and duplicate tags when a translator
> needs different msgids.
OK, thanks. I've committed this change, then. The extra options on the
front page of http://bugs.debian.org/ to include/exclude bugs with
certain tags will show up within a few hours.
Cheers,
--
Colin Watson [EMAIL PROTECTED]
