Your message dated Sun, 5 Sep 2004 20:01:48 +0200
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#265042: www.debian.org: AMD Ports page out of date (broken
links, info given)
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere. Please contact me immediately.)
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)
--------------------------------------
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 11 Aug 2004 13:54:04 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed Aug 11 06:54:04 2004
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from mrelay3.uni-hannover.de [130.75.2.41] (root)
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1ButYJ-00040u-00; Wed, 11 Aug 2004 06:54:04 -0700
Received: from mail.itp.uni-hannover.de (mail.itp.uni-hannover.de
[130.75.25.242])
by mrelay3.uni-hannover.de (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id
i7BDrubE014470
for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Wed, 11 Aug 2004 15:53:56 +0200 (MEST)
Received: from pleione.itp.uni-hannover.de (pleione.itp.uni-hannover.de
[130.75.25.99])
by mail.itp.uni-hannover.de (Postfix) with ESMTP
id 063E42F081; Wed, 11 Aug 2004 15:53:48 +0200 (CEST)
Received: by pleione.itp.uni-hannover.de (Postfix, from userid 237)
id B47EB5F36; Wed, 11 Aug 2004 15:53:48 +0200 (CEST)
From: Helge Kreutzmann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Debian Bug Tracking System <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: www.debian.org: AMD Ports page out of date (broken links, info given)
X-Mailer: reportbug 1.50
Date: Wed, 11 Aug 2004 15:53:48 +0200
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
X-Greylist: Sender IP whitelisted, not delayed by milter-greylist-1.2.2
(mrelay3.uni-hannover.de [130.75.2.41]); Wed, 11 Aug 2004 15:53:56 +0200 (MEST)
X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.42
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE
autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25
X-Spam-Level:
Package: www.debian.org
Version: N/A; reported 2004-08-11
Severity: normal
http://www.debian.org/ports/amd64/index.en.html
is out of date. It states:
A pure 64bit port seems to be academical and of little use. However,
such a pure port would be the easiest thing to support ..
AFAIK the pure 64bit port is ready to go (waiting for inclusion). Stating
that it is "of little use" discredits itself. And "would be" suggest
future, which is IMHO incorrect (except for aceptance into the main
archive).
Furthermore the
# Documentation (FAQ and HOWTO)
link is invalid. I think it should point to
https://alioth.debian.org/docman/?group_id=30192
-- System Information
Debian Release: 3.0
Architecture: i386
Kernel: Linux pleione 2.4.26-grsec #1 Tue Aug 10 15:42:40 CEST 2004 i686
Locale: LANG=en_US, LC_CTYPE=en_US
---------------------------------------
Received: (at 265042-done) by bugs.debian.org; 5 Sep 2004 18:02:24 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sun Sep 05 11:02:24 2004
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from mail.sorgfalt.net [217.160.169.191]
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1C41LM-0008JP-00; Sun, 05 Sep 2004 11:02:24 -0700
Received: from p548085dc.dip.t-dialin.net ([84.128.133.220] helo=djpig.djpig.de)
by mail.sorgfalt.net with asmtp
(Cipher TLS-1.0:DHE_RSA_3DES_EDE_CBC_SHA:24) (Exim 4.34 1)
id 1C41Ma-0003Xk-DC
for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Sun, 05 Sep 2004 20:03:40 +0200
Received: from djpig by djpig.djpig.de with local (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian))
id 1C41Kn-0001Pl-00
for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Sun, 05 Sep 2004 20:01:49 +0200
Date: Sun, 5 Sep 2004 20:01:48 +0200
From: Frank Lichtenheld <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Bug#265042: www.debian.org: AMD Ports page out of date (broken
links, info given)
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
References: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.6+20040722i
Sender: Frank Lichtenheld <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_BUG_NUMBER
autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25
X-Spam-Level:
On Wed, Aug 11, 2004 at 03:53:48PM +0200, Helge Kreutzmann wrote:
> http://www.debian.org/ports/amd64/index.en.html
>
> is out of date. It states:
> A pure 64bit port seems to be academical and of little use. However,
> such a pure port would be the easiest thing to support ..
>
> AFAIK the pure 64bit port is ready to go (waiting for inclusion). Stating
> that it is "of little use" discredits itself. And "would be" suggest
> future, which is IMHO incorrect (except for aceptance into the main
> archive).
>
> Furthermore the
> # Documentation (FAQ and HOWTO)
> link is invalid. I think it should point to
>
> https://alioth.debian.org/docman/?group_id=30192
This seems to have been fixed, therefor closing the bug.
Gruesse,
--
Frank Lichtenheld <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
www: http://www.djpig.de/
