On Sat, Mar 01, 2008 at 05:01:16AM -0500, Filipus Klutiero wrote:
> Le March 1, 2008 04:03:28 am Frank Lichtenheld, vous avez écrit :
> > Either way, I don't think that debian-www is the right place to
discuss
> > this. I would suggest debian-project or debian-publicity.
>
> I'm convinced that
> Can you please stop the fud, Debian releases have security support till
> one year *after the next release*, which is at least 2.5 years and not
> just 1 as you seem to imply...
>
> Cheers
>
> Luk
Can you please start reading, I never wrote something which seems to imply
that Debian releases hav
Filipus Klutiero wrote:
> Le March 1, 2008 04:03:28 am Frank Lichtenheld, vous avez écrit :
>> On Sat, Mar 01, 2008 at 03:47:27AM -0500, Filipus Klutiero wrote:
>>> Since Red Hat releases at least each 3 years, that means Red Hat commits
>>> to supporting its "oldstables" for at least 4 years, whic
On Sat, Mar 01, 2008 at 05:01:16AM -0500, Filipus Klutiero wrote:
> Le March 1, 2008 04:03:28 am Frank Lichtenheld, vous avez écrit :
> > On Sat, Mar 01, 2008 at 03:47:27AM -0500, Filipus Klutiero wrote:
> > > Since Red Hat releases at least each 3 years, that means Red Hat commits
> > > to support
On Sat, Mar 01, 2008 at 05:01:16AM -0500, Filipus Klutiero wrote:
> Le March 1, 2008 04:03:28 am Frank Lichtenheld, vous avez écrit :
> > Either way, I don't think that debian-www is the right place to discuss
> > this. I would suggest debian-project or debian-publicity.
>
> I'm convinced that th
Le March 1, 2008 04:03:28 am Frank Lichtenheld, vous avez écrit :
> On Sat, Mar 01, 2008 at 03:47:27AM -0500, Filipus Klutiero wrote:
> > Since Red Hat releases at least each 3 years, that means Red Hat commits
> > to supporting its "oldstables" for at least 4 years, which is much more
> > than 1 y
On Sat, Mar 01, 2008 at 03:47:27AM -0500, Filipus Klutiero wrote:
> Since Red Hat releases at least each 3 years, that means Red Hat commits to
> supporting its "oldstables" for at least 4 years, which is much more than 1
> year.
>
> IMO, more than 4 years is too much. But comparing to that, it'
Package: www.debian.org
Severity: minor
According to http://www.us.debian.org/News/2008/20080229
One year after the release of Debian GNU/Linux 4.0 alias 'etch' and nearly
three years after the release of Debian GNU/Linux 3.1 alias 'sarge' the
security support for the old distribution (3.1 alia
8 matches
Mail list logo