Re: Current release version needs bumping on front page

2003-11-26 Thread Alexander Winston
On Wed, 2003-11-26 at 16:56, MJ Ray wrote: > On 2003-11-26 21:12:57 + Alexander Winston > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > "November 21, 2003" (without the ordinal suffixes) would be best. > > ITYM "21st November, 2003" :^) No, I mean "November 21, 2003." signature.asc Description: This i

Re: Current release version needs bumping on front page

2003-11-26 Thread MJ Ray
On 2003-11-26 21:12:57 + Alexander Winston <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: "November 21, 2003" (without the ordinal suffixes) would be best. ITYM "21st November, 2003" :^)

Re: Current release version needs bumping on front page

2003-11-26 Thread Alexander Winston
On Mon, 2003-11-24 at 10:20, Olly Betts wrote: > I would file a bug, but the BTS still seems to be down... > > http://www.debian.org/ section "Getting Started" says: > > The latest stable release of Debian is 3.0r1. The last update to this > release was made on December 16th, 2002. > > This

Current release version needs bumping on front page

2003-11-26 Thread Olly Betts
I would file a bug, but the BTS still seems to be down... http://www.debian.org/ section "Getting Started" says: The latest stable release of Debian is 3.0r1. The last update to this release was made on December 16th, 2002. This should be update to reflect the release of 3.0r2 - something li