On Thu, 04 Sep 2008 09:07:00 +0200
Franklin PIAT <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> It's probably a wrong example :
> * The wiki already have such pages (see InstallingDebianOn).
> * We (you, me and the users) don't want to have multiples page on
> the wiki to report hardware howtos.
> * Those pages
On Wed, 2008-09-03 at 20:26 -0400, Daniel Dickinson wrote:
> On Thu, 04 Sep 2008 01:13:52 +0200
> Franklin PIAT <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > On Wed, 2008-09-03 at 18:34 -0400, Daniel Dickinson wrote:
> > > On Wed, 03 Sep 2008 09:02:43 +0200
> > > Franklin PIAT <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > >
On Thu, 04 Sep 2008 01:13:52 +0200
Franklin PIAT <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Wed, 2008-09-03 at 18:34 -0400, Daniel Dickinson wrote:
> > On Wed, 03 Sep 2008 09:02:43 +0200
> > Franklin PIAT <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > > So to make it short : You can create a "book" on our wiki, with a
On Wed, 03 Sep 2008 09:02:43 +0200
Franklin PIAT <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Contribution/comments/review of the pages [3] and [4] are welcome.
>
> [1] http://wiki.debian.org/DebianWiki/LicencingTerms
> [2] http://bugs.debian.org/385797
> [3] http://wiki.debian.org/DebianWiki/LicencingTerms/Pr
On Wed, 2008-09-03 at 18:34 -0400, Daniel Dickinson wrote:
> On Wed, 03 Sep 2008 09:02:43 +0200
> Franklin PIAT <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > So to make it short : You can create a "book" on our wiki, with a
> > specific license. Also, you are welcome to review the page [3] and
> > [4].
>
> Is
On Wed, 03 Sep 2008 09:02:43 +0200
Franklin PIAT <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hello Daniel,
>
>
> So to make it short : You can create a "book" on our wiki, with a
> specific license. Also, you are welcome to review the page [3] and
> [4].
Is there anyway to make sub-pages also automatically ha
Hello Daniel,
On Wed, 2008-09-03 at 00:08 -0400, Daniel Dickinson wrote:
> Is there anything a non-DD can do to help get the debian wiki licensing
> mess straightened out? I'd like to help, but I'm not a DD.
An overview of the situation is available at [1] and [2]. Our plan is
prepare some pages
Is there anything a non-DD can do to help get the debian wiki licensing
mess straightened out? I'd like to help, but I'm not a DD.
Also, I'd like to point out that this is something that I'm going to
have to set up a separate wiki because of, because the current wiki
situation doesn't allow for m
Franklin PIAT <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> If someone can confirm that the page wiki.debian.org/copyright.html
> never existed, could we consider that the license of http://debian.org
> was the one applicable to the wiki at that time ? (based on the fact
> that wiki.debian.org is a child domain of
On Sun, 2008-03-02 at 19:39 +, Jon Dowland wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 27, 2008 at 03:15:21AM +0100, Franklin PIAT wrote:
> > I have the impression that since wiki.debian.net was moved to
> > http://wiki.debian.org in 2004, It has never had a valid
> > "/copyright.html" page.
> > (because that page wa
On Wed, Feb 27, 2008 at 03:15:21AM +0100, Franklin PIAT wrote:
> I have the impression that since wiki.debian.net was moved to
> http://wiki.debian.org in 2004, It has never had a valid
> "/copyright.html" page.
> (because that page was static on wiki.d.net, but wiki.d.net had a catch
> all redirec
On Tue, Feb 26, 2008 at 11:35:18PM +0100, Franklin PIAT wrote:
> Hello,
>
> Jon Downloand has started to tweak the license pages on the wiki.
> I definitely agree that the wiki license should be clarified.
>
> However, I would like to say here that I strongly disagree with having
> "per page" lic
On Wed, 2008-02-27 at 00:14 +, Jon Dowland wrote:
> > Jon Downloand has started to tweak the license pages on
> > the wiki. I definitely agree that the wiki license should
> > be clarified.
> >
> > However, I would like to say here that I strongly disagree
> > with having "per page" licensin
> Jon Downloand has started to tweak the license pages on
> the wiki. I definitely agree that the wiki license should
> be clarified.
>
> However, I would like to say here that I strongly disagree
> with having "per page" licensing terms, because it would
> prevent merging such pages.
Me too, bu
Hello,
Jon Downloand has started to tweak the license pages on the wiki.
I definitely agree that the wiki license should be clarified.
However, I would like to say here that I strongly disagree with having
"per page" licensing terms, because it would prevent merging such pages.
The exception to
15 matches
Mail list logo
