Re: I don't understand News/2000/20000216.wml

2004-03-16 Thread Jens Seidel
On Tue, Mar 16, 2004 at 04:36:10PM +0900, Tomohiro KUBOTA wrote: > Hi, > > From: Jens Seidel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Subject: Re: I don't understand News/2000/2216.wml > Date: Mon, 15 Mar 2004 01:42:35 +0100 > > Here I think the meaning of the sentence is cl

Re: I don't understand News/2000/20000216.wml

2004-03-16 Thread Tomohiro KUBOTA
Hi, From: Jens Seidel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Subject: Re: I don't understand News/2000/2216.wml Date: Mon, 15 Mar 2004 01:42:35 +0100 > As far as I understand it means something similar to > "Scan.pm y2k problem Date: fixed missing message's date > (was incorrect

Re: I don't understand News/2000/20000216.wml

2004-03-15 Thread Gerfried Fuchs
* Jens Seidel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2004-03-15 01:42]: > On Mon, Mar 15, 2004 at 09:03:27AM +0900, Tomohiro KUBOTA wrote: >> package : im >> version : 1:100-3 >> architectures: all >> issue: Scan.pm y2k problem Date: filed missing message's date >> (was inc

Re: I don't understand News/2000/20000216.wml

2004-03-14 Thread Jens Seidel
On Mon, Mar 15, 2004 at 09:03:27AM +0900, Tomohiro KUBOTA wrote: > Hi, > > During updating Japanese translation of Debian webwml, > I found a possible typo in English page. > > The page is News/2000/2216.wml. > > -- > package : im > version : 1:100-3 > architectures: all

I don't understand News/2000/20000216.wml

2004-03-14 Thread Tomohiro KUBOTA
Hi, During updating Japanese translation of Debian webwml, I found a possible typo in English page. The page is News/2000/2216.wml. -- package : im version : 1:100-3 architectures: all issue: Scan.pm y2k problem Date: filed missing message's date