* Kalle Söderman [2010-07-06 00:52:00 CEST]:
> It should alway point to debian.org in my opinion. I have been slightly
> unsure whether we can vary the top links across subdomains but have
> always intended the logo to be absolutely "home".
See my other reply on this topic. :)
> It seems that c
* Martin Zobel-Helas [2010-07-05 23:43:41 CEST]:
> Nice! I took the liberty to edit it a bit and add a paragraph about
> ''Sites in progess moving to kallesdesign''.
Added www.deb.at too, and am thinking of reactivating packages.deb.at
(still down) too just for completeness.
> I have some more
- Original message -
> We seem to have a smaller layout issue with epiphany.
> http://people.debian.org/~zobel/Screenshot-dsa.debian.org.png
>
> Ideas?
My hunch is that Epiphany is set up with a very small font. Epiphany takes the
font size from the gnome settings which usually means a m
On Jul 6, 2010, at 11:41, Martin Zobel-Helas wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Mon Jul 05, 2010 at 23:52:00 +0100, Kalle Söderman wrote:
>>> Expect more questions to come up! :)
>>
>> Keep'em coming!
>
> We seem to have a smaller layout issue with epiphany.
> http://people.debian.org/~zobel/Screenshot-dsa.
Hi,
On Mon Jul 05, 2010 at 23:52:00 +0100, Kalle Söderman wrote:
> > Expect more questions to come up! :)
>
> Keep'em coming!
We seem to have a smaller layout issue with epiphany.
http://people.debian.org/~zobel/Screenshot-dsa.debian.org.png
Ideas?
Cheers,
Martin
--
Martin Zobel-Helas | D
On 23:43 Mon 05 Jul, Martin Zobel-Helas wrote:
> Nice! I took the liberty to edit it a bit and add a paragraph about
> ''Sites in progess moving to kallesdesign''.
Excellent, just the kind of thing I intended it for.
> I have some more general question:
>
> * Where is the "logo link" supposed
Hi,
On Mon Jul 05, 2010 at 21:50:06 +0100, Kalle Söderman wrote:
> On 21:22 Mon 05 Jul, Simon Paillard wrote:
> > Great.
> > I noticed a little glitch that I don't remember I noticed it previously:
> > the second navbar at the top (the one below "About", "Getting"..) is not
> > displayed on the f
On 21:22 Mon 05 Jul, Simon Paillard wrote:
> Great.
> I noticed a little glitch that I don't remember I noticed it previously:
> the second navbar at the top (the one below "About", "Getting"..) is not
> displayed on the full width (especially under the debian logo):
> http://people.debian.org/~spa
On Sun, Jul 04, 2010 at 06:38:35PM +0200, Martin Zobel-Helas wrote:
> On Fri Jun 18, 2010 at 13:05:13 +0200, Gerfried Fuchs wrote:
[..]
> > So here is the nex big step: A gitweb theme[1] using Kalle's
> > proposal[2]. I enabled it on my own gitweb installation[3] so that
> > people can see it live
On 07/05/2010 01:56 PM, Gerfried Fuchs wrote:
> Thanks for your comment. The www.deb.at page uses an older css file and
> actually indeed the version git.deb.at is the more current approach, it
> will indeed be the same across the different sites.
:-)
I noticed the rounded corners on the DSA webs
* Umang Varma [2010-07-05 08:08:38 CEST]:
> On 06/18/2010 04:35 PM, Gerfried Fuchs wrote:
> > So here is the nex big step: A gitweb theme[1] using Kalle's
> > proposal[2]. I enabled it on my own gitweb installation[3] so that
> > people can see it live and test it. Feel free to clone it from ther
Hi,
On 06/18/2010 04:35 PM, Gerfried Fuchs wrote:
> Hi!
>
> We ain't dead. A long time has passed since I last wrote on this topic,
> and a lot thing happened—unfortunately (for this effort) in other areas.
> This doesn't mean that this effort is being abandoned.
>
> So here is the nex big
Hi,
On Fri Jun 18, 2010 at 13:05:13 +0200, Gerfried Fuchs wrote:
> Hi!
>
> We ain't dead. A long time has passed since I last wrote on this topic,
> and a lot thing happened—unfortunately (for this effort) in other areas.
> This doesn't mean that this effort is being abandoned.
>
> So he
On Fri, Jun 18, 2010 at 01:05:13PM +0200, Gerfried Fuchs wrote:
> Hi!
>
> We ain't dead. A long time has passed since I last wrote on this topic,
> and a lot thing happened—unfortunately (for this effort) in other areas.
> This doesn't mean that this effort is being abandoned.
I was worried
On Fri, Jun 18, 2010 at 01:05:13PM +0200, Gerfried Fuchs wrote:
> We ain't dead. A long time has passed since I last wrote on this topic,
> and a lot thing happened—unfortunately (for this effort) in other areas.
> This doesn't mean that this effort is being abandoned.
Glad to hear it.
I looked at
Hi,
On Fri Jun 18, 2010 at 13:05:13 +0200, Gerfried Fuchs wrote:
> Hi!
>
> We ain't dead. A long time has passed since I last wrote on this topic,
> and a lot thing happened—unfortunately (for this effort) in other areas.
> This doesn't mean that this effort is being abandoned.
>
> So he
Hi!
We ain't dead. A long time has passed since I last wrote on this topic,
and a lot thing happened—unfortunately (for this effort) in other areas.
This doesn't mean that this effort is being abandoned.
So here is the nex big step: A gitweb theme[1] using Kalle's
proposal[2]. I enabled
17 matches
Mail list logo
