On Wed, Apr 18, 2018 at 7:06 PM, Thorsten Glaser wrote:
> that is very ouch. It looks completely different, and its UI
> makes it hard to find things, I am very happy with p.qa.d.o.
Hmm, the UI seems like it is almost exactly the same to me.
> To whom do I have to talk to revert this decision
Hello,
> packages.qa.d.o is deprecated and will eventually go away once
> tracker.d.o supports everything packages.qa.d.o does, so I don't think
that is very ouch. It looks completely different, and its UI
makes it hard to find things, I am very happy with p.qa.d.o.
To whom do I have to talk to
On Wed, Apr 18, 2018 at 12:38 AM, Thorsten Glaser wrote:
> https://packages.debian.org/source/sid/libidn2 (for example)
> has a number of links on the right, e.g. “Bug Reports”,
> “Developer Information”, etc.
>
> There used to be a link to packages.qa.d.o/libi/libidn2.html
> there, which seems
Hi,
https://packages.debian.org/source/sid/libidn2 (for example)
has a number of links on the right, e.g. “Bug Reports”,
“Developer Information”, etc.
There used to be a link to packages.qa.d.o/libi/libidn2.html
there, which seems to have vanished.
Please re-add that link.
Thanks,
//mirabilos
4 matches
Mail list logo
