Drat. I forgot to move this to debian-www.
On Fri, Nov 24, 2000 at 10:30:02AM -0500, Jay Treacy wrote:
Web discussions are held on debian-www@lists.debian.org
It would be a good idea if you notified people before you started
such work so you don't waste your time. We have not implemented
* James A. Treacy [EMAIL PROTECTED] [20001124 10:35]:
Also, we were contemplating switching to dynamic pages.
I don't know if this is a good idea performance wise.
Since the content is updated daily static pages don't make a lot of
sense.
Why? Disk space doesn't matter, but performance
On Fri, Nov 24, 2000 at 05:03:10PM +, Martin Michlmayr wrote:
* James A. Treacy [EMAIL PROTECTED] [20001124 10:35]:
Also, we were contemplating switching to dynamic pages.
I don't know if this is a good idea performance wise.
There is no question that static pages are more efficient.
On Fri, Nov 24, 2000 at 12:33:21PM -0500, James A. Treacy wrote:
Also, we were contemplating switching to dynamic pages.
I don't know if this is a good idea performance wise.
There is no question that static pages are more efficient. The question is
whether we can provide dynamic pages
* Josip Rodin [EMAIL PROTECTED] [20001124 19:48]:
We could have cool dynamic stuff using only CGIs if we had a non-US
server carrying both archives, But we don't have such a server.
Then let's find a server. Is there any official person or way to
approach a sponsor, or can I simply go ahead
On Fri, Nov 24, 2000 at 07:26:55PM +, Martin Michlmayr wrote:
We could have cool dynamic stuff using only CGIs if we had a non-US
server carrying both archives, But we don't have such a server.
Then let's find a server. Is there any official person or way to
approach a sponsor, or can
* Josip Rodin [EMAIL PROTECTED] [20001124 20:40]:
I think some Perl code could find out appropriate versions for each
architecture.
That's easy; the scripts in my home on master do that already.
Then why did you say:
My script looks at the Packages.arch file to get the proper version.
You
7 matches
Mail list logo
