* doug jensen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2003-09-14 12:41]:
> Alfie, thanks for reviewing the CVS logs, it's nice to know that someone
> is watching for mistakes that I might make.
TBH I didn't directly review the CVS logs, it was just that the files
were already translated and I noticed it through upd
Matt, I've finally gotten around to doing a diff on the patches you
committed for the 1999 directory. Thanks for making the spelling
corrections. I'm still having problems with spaces in the content,
around the tags, hopefully next time will be better. Thanks for your
help.
Peter and Alfie, tha
On Tue, Sep 02, 2003 at 03:48:50PM -0600, doug jensen wrote:
> Should I ask, "Please find errors in these patches." instead of "If this
> is ok could someone please commit?"
>
> Fixed patches? Attached.
Applied, thanks.
--
Matt
On Tue, Sep 02, 2003 at 06:10:40AM -0600, doug jensen wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 02, 2003 at 12:27:49PM +0200, Gerfried Fuchs wrote:
> > * Peter Karlsson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2003-09-02 12:10]:
> > > but it is a lot more work to figure out what word was changed in a
> > > re-justified paragraph.
> >
> >
On Tue, Sep 02, 2003 at 12:27:49PM +0200, Gerfried Fuchs wrote:
> * Peter Karlsson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2003-09-02 12:10]:
> > but it is a lot more work to figure out what word was changed in a
> > re-justified paragraph.
>
> I don't think that we can't overemphasis on this. Don't do it...
>
So
* Peter Karlsson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2003-09-02 12:10]:
> Yes, the result may look prettier
Only in the source, the resulting webpage doesn't look anymore fancier
than without readjusting
> but it is a lot more work to figure out what word was changed in a
> re-justified paragraph.
I don'
doug jensen:
> If this set of patches are ok, could someone please commit them?
Please avoid doing formatting changes to the source when also changing
content, it makes it a lot harder to find the content changes for us
translators. Especially avoid to re-justify paragraphs. Yes, the result
may l
On Wed, Aug 20, 2003 at 04:22:39AM -0700, Matt Kraai wrote:
>
> I've committed them (modulo a bunch of typo fixes). Thanks.
>
Matt, thanks for making all those corrections and committing the patches
for the undated directory.
This next set of patches are for the webwml/english/security/1999
di
On Fri, Aug 15, 2003 at 12:57:38PM -0600, doug jensen wrote:
> Attached are patches for the 'undated' security advisories. After they
> are applied there will be four _unpatched_ advisories in that directory,
> three for 'xfree' and one for 'mc'. At this time it doesn't appear
> that I will find
Hello,
Attached are patches for the 'undated' security advisories. After they
are applied there will be four _unpatched_ advisories in that directory,
three for 'xfree' and one for 'mc'. At this time it doesn't appear
that I will find any useable information for those four advisories.
If all th
On Mon, Aug 04, 2003 at 04:38:19AM -0700, Matt Kraai wrote:
> > ## This change allows "Vulnerable" to be "Yes" and "Security database
> > ## reference" to be displayed.
> > --- security/undated/1ssh.data.old Thu Apr 19 09:52:11 2001
> > +++ security/undated/1ssh.data.new Sat Jul 19 17:37:41 200
On Mon, Aug 04, 2003 at 10:03:43AM -0600, doug jensen wrote:
> > -Yes
> > +yes
> ...
> > Why do you change the case of "yes"?
>
> I'm guessing that the isvulnerable tag is case sensitive. Changing the
> case causes the "yes" to be displayed on the web page.
It looks like most of the undated advi
On Mon, Aug 04, 2003 at 04:38:19AM -0700, Matt Kraai wrote:
> I've applied the changes for buzz, but I couldn't find any uses
> for rex. Could you point me to one?
You are correct, there is nothing using the rex code at this time. The
code seemed more complete with it included, but it will pro
On Wed, Jul 30, 2003 at 05:24:02PM -0600, doug jensen wrote:
> An email sent to debian-security, asking for comments from Matt and/or
> Javier, received no response.
>
> So, I'm wondering if anyone wants to commit the following three patches?
> Thanks for your consideration.
Thanks for cleaning t
On Mon, Jul 21, 2003 at 11:15:14AM +0200, Gerfried Fuchs wrote:
> * doug jensen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2003-07-20 18:53]:
> > So, I will make those corrections and send the patches back to the list
> > to be commited, or bug reports to www.debian.org, or ...?
>
> Send them to the list, IMHO no need
* doug jensen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2003-07-20 18:53]:
> So, I will make those corrections and send the patches back to the list
> to be commited, or bug reports to www.debian.org, or ...?
Send them to the list, IMHO no need to bloat the BTS with it. If noone
reacts you can still send them to the
On Sun, Jul 20, 2003 at 11:43:49PM +0200, Josip Rodin wrote:
> What about the debian-security-announce list archive?
I intend to work on those also.
> Looks okay... but I'd move the note about potential problems below the list,
> and remove the last three items -- visitors don't really care much
On Sun, Jul 20, 2003 at 02:16:19PM -0600, doug jensen wrote:
> Find the "moreinfo" entries for older years that contain mentions
> of lists-archives instead of including text from it or even linking
> to it, and correct it.
>
> There are many advisories in 1997 and early 1998 that lack eve
Hi,
On the Debian Web Pages TODO List, there is the following section:
security
Find the "moreinfo" entries for older years that contain mentions
of lists-archives instead of including text from it or even linking
to it, and correct it.
There are many advisories in 1997 and early 1998 th
19 matches
Mail list logo
