Bug#815202: #815202 packages: machines and sponsors information is outdated

No progress for the last 7 years :-( I have just updated the sponsors list manually for now. Holger -- Holger Wansing PGP-Fingerprint: 496A C6E8 1442 4B34 8508 3529 59F1 87CA 156E B076

Bug#861781: marked as done (www.debian.org: updating Debian memberships in other organisations information)

Your message dated Mon, 20 May 2024 23:19:46 +0200 with message-id <26187.48754.244035.733...@cs.uni-koeln.de> and subject line closing has caused the Debian Bug report #861781, regarding www.debian.org: updating Debian memberships in other organisations information to be marked a

Bug#1067029: marked as done (www.debian.org: Landing page missing donation information)

Your message dated Sun, 17 Mar 2024 18:38:26 +0100 with message-id <26103.10898.359062.945...@cs.uni-koeln.de> and subject line closing has caused the Debian Bug report #1067029, regarding www.debian.org: Landing page missing donation information to be marked as done. This means that you

Bug#1067029: www.debian.org: Landing page missing donation information

Package: www.debian.org Severity: normal Hello, I realized that the landing page <https://www.debian.org> do miss information (or link) about how to donate to Debian. Might be <https://www.debian.org/donations.en.html> Kind Christian

Wichtige Information zu Ihrer Kreditkarte!

?? 13.10.2023 Sehr geehrter Kunde ,? *Da Sie den Bestätigungsprozess noch nicht durchlaufen haben,

Bug#905355: marked as done (www.debian.org: link to list of mirrors does not contain expected information)

Your message dated Tue, 3 Oct 2023 22:06:38 +0200 with message-id <25884.29774.719903.45...@cs.uni-koeln.de> and subject line closing has caused the Debian Bug report #905355, regarding www.debian.org: link to list of mirrors does not contain expected information to be marked as done. This

Bug#1034444: marked as done (www.debian.org: Incorrect information in https://www.debian.org/releases/)

Your message dated Tue, 18 Apr 2023 10:03:11 +0200 with message-id and subject line Bug#103: www.debian.org: Incorrect information in https://www.debian.org/releases/ has caused the Debian Bug report #103, regarding www.debian.org: Incorrect information in https://www.debian.org

Bug#1034444: www.debian.org: Incorrect information in https://www.debian.org/releases/

://deb.li/BY31 I think the English pages should show the accurate information in the following hours (after the next website build). Translations should follow in the next days. Kind regards, -- Laura Arjona Reina https://wiki.debian.org/LauraArjona

Bug#1034444: www.debian.org: Incorrect information in https://www.debian.org/releases/

Package: www.debian.org Severity: normal X-Debbugs-Cc: charlescur...@charlescurley.com Dear Maintainer, Apparently https://www.debian.org/releases/ has some errors. See the discussion at https://lists.debian.org/debian-user/2023/04/msg00602.html and the two (so far) replies. Thank you.

Bug#1029265: www.debian.org: "Bugs/server-control" missing information about "Control:"

On Fri, 2023-01-20 at 14:06 +, Christian Buhtz wrote: > https://www.debian.org/Bugs/server-control > > It lacks the information that all on that site described commands need to have > a "Control: " string in front of them. FTR, the Control pseudo-header is d

Bug#1029265: www.debian.org: "Bugs/server-control" missing information about "Control:"

Hi Christian, While improving the current doc can always happen, I'm not sure I agree with your assessment that critical information is missing… Christian Buhtz (2023-01-20): > https://www.debian.org/Bugs/server-control […] The very first line mentions writing those mails to c

Bug#1029265: www.debian.org: "Bugs/server-control" missing information about "Control:"

Package: www.debian.org Severity: normal Dear Maintainer, it is about this part of your website. https://www.debian.org/Bugs/server-control It lacks the information that all on that site described commands need to have a "Control: " string in front of them. Otherwise they are useles

Bug#1029012: marked as done (www.debian.org: https://www.debian.org/releases/bullseye/debian-installer shows "trixie" information)

Your message dated Mon, 16 Jan 2023 18:53:08 +0100 with message-id <20230116175308.266ih5gc5m3uq...@mraw.org> and subject line Re: Bug#1029012: www.debian.org: https://www.debian.org/releases/bullseye/debian-installer shows "trixie" information has caused the Debian Bug

Bug#1029012: www.debian.org: https://www.debian.org/releases/bullseye/debian-installer shows "trixie" information

Cyril Brulebois (2023-01-16): > I can imagine two scenarios: > - sync issue; > - web server issue. Actually, even if files seem correct, some fixup in the webwml source seems required: - https://salsa.debian.org/webmaster-team/webwml/-/commit/1e1313a4e274d3ef820eec07f239bcb43d9f42c4 -

Bug#1029012: www.debian.org: https://www.debian.org/releases/bullseye/debian-installer shows "trixie" information

Micah Anderson (2023-01-16): > english/releases/bullseye/debian-installer/index.wml doesn't seem crazy at > first glance… > interestingly, grep -i trixie > /srv/www.debian.org/webwml/english/releases/bullseye/debian-installer/index.en.html > returns nothing. > (so the build results seem to

Bug#1029012: www.debian.org: https://www.debian.org/releases/bullseye/debian-installer shows "trixie" information

s/bullseye/debian-installer which actually has no content at all, except for, "For installation images and documentation about how to install "trixie" (which is currently Testing), see the Debian-Installer page." This is obviously wrong, it should point to bullseye install

Help deleting information from your site

To whom it may concern, I've found my personal data on the following page on your website: https://lists.debian.org/debian-user/2005/05/msg03185.html I hereby exercise my right to privacy and request that you delete all information you are posting, sharing, selling, and storing about me

Help deleting information from your site

To whom it may concern, I've found my personal data on the following page on your website: https://lists.debian.org/debian-user/2005/05/msg03185.html I hereby exercise my right to privacy and request that you delete all information you are posting, sharing, selling, and storing about me

Help deleting information from your site

To whom it may concern, I've found my personal data on the following page on your website: https://lists.debian.org/debian-user/2005/05/msg03185.html I hereby exercise my right to privacy and request that you delete all information you are posting, sharing, selling, and storing about me

Help deleting information from your site

To whom it may concern, I've found my personal data on the following page on your website: https://lists.debian.org/debian-user/2005/05/msg03185.html I hereby exercise my right to privacy and request that you delete all information you are posting, sharing, selling, and storing about me

Please remove this listing so that a person's private contact information is not openly noticed on your website.

-archive.debian.net/pipermail/debhelper-devel/Week-of-Mon-20140407/000412.html I hope to remove this listing from your server as I do not want my personal information with my credentials publicly noticeable. If my private information is not removed, I will start a legal procedure to remove the listing

Re: Bug#991972: More information

[Sorry, Tomas, I just realized that earlier I replied only to you rather than to the whole list.] There is some Debian blessing of backports.org. When visiting the Debian webserver over http and asking for www.backports.org, the Debian webserver redirects the visitor to

Bug#991972: More information

So I'm not sure what to do about this ticket. The current situation is: * we have backports.org - which does *not* belong to Debian * when accessing it, some variations of the URL get forwarded to https://backports.debian.org/ and some break in various way My opinion on this is: let's let

Information regarding live media is not easy to find from the releases page

Hi, On the main bullseye releases page [1], it only mentions about debian installer. I think it should also include a link to live install images [2] "To obtain and install Debian, see the installation information page and the Installation Guide." should probably be changed to,

Bug#991972: More information

Sorry, I should have checked this on more than one browser before reporting. For some reason my ancient Firefox profile, when I browse to "backports.org", redirects to https://www.backports.org/. Perhaps this was a cached permanent redirect, or something to do with HSTS. On a naive profile

Bug#956192: Any progress or missing information?

Hello Laura, On Sun, Apr 11, 2021 at 12:36:38PM +0200, Laura Arjona Reina wrote: > I have added an exception about manpages-l10n in a similar way than was > already for manpages-fr-extra (thanks David Prévot for the hint): > >

Bug#956192: Any progress or missing information?

Hi I have added an exception about manpages-l10n in a similar way than was already for manpages-fr-extra (thanks David Prévot for the hint): https://salsa.debian.org/webmaster-team/webwml/-/commit/017f1d07c22c906dcb76ad48d7db75ff615b9b99 Closing the bug, feel free to reopen if you see something

Bug#956192: Any progress or missing information?

Hello Laura, On Sun, Apr 11, 2021 at 12:36:38PM +0200, Laura Arjona Reina wrote: > I have added an exception about manpages-l10n in a similar way than was > already for manpages-fr-extra (thanks David Prévot for the hint): > >

Bug#956192: Any progress or missing information?

Dear webmasters, one year ago I requested that manpages-l10n should be removed from https://www.debian.org/international/l10n/po/de as it does not make sense to track it. David Prevot reported that in the past the (no longer existing) manpages-fr-extra had been removed from being listed there as

Re: package information tracker similar to packages.debian.org?

Hallo, * Patrick Schleizer [Sun, Jan 03 2021, 10:09:16AM]: > Which Open Source options exist to host something similar to > packages.debian.org/nano for a Debian derivative? I.e. an APT web > frontend showing information about packages such as package short > description, long descript

Send information in a PDF form

Hi dear hop you are fine please send me all information in a PDF form kindly

Request to place information about our company on the list of companies using Debians

1. Agencja Interaktywna Codefia, Warszawa, Poland 2. Commercial 3. https://www.codefia.pl 4. We use Debian on a couple of our servers, and a few of our workstations in our office and outside in the client's places. We discovered that Debian servers are much powerful and useful than other

Xero contact information

Hi, I am writing this email to check if you are interested in acquiring *Xero *contact email list for your demand generation efforts. We also have information on QuickBooks Online, QuickBooks Desktop Pro, FreshBooks, Intuit, Sage 50c and many more. Information: Name, Title, Email, Phone

Bug#962564: getting "Forbidden (403) CSRF verification failed. Request aborted. More information is available with DEBUG=True." with Firefox from buster

st aborted. More information is available with DEBUG=True. Cookies are on. JavaScript is on. ? *t -- System Information: Debian Release: 10.4 APT prefers stable APT policy: (500, 'stable') Architecture: amd64 (x86_64) Foreign Architectures: i386 Kernel: Linux 4.19.0-9-amd64 (SMP w/8

Re: No information on "os-prober" package available

On 06/08/2020 06:12 AM, Adam D. Barratt wrote: On Mon, 2020-06-08 at 05:30 -0500, Richard Owlett wrote: But there is a documentation problem. https://dyn.manpages.debian.org/jump?q=os-prober responds Manpage not found Sorry, the manpage “os-prober” was not found! Did you spell it correctly?

Re: No information on "os-prober" package available

On Mon, 2020-06-08 at 05:30 -0500, Richard Owlett wrote: > But there is a documentation problem. > > https://dyn.manpages.debian.org/jump?q=os-prober responds > > Manpage not found > > Sorry, the manpage “os-prober” was not found! Did you spell it > > correctly? As far as I can see, the package

Re: No information on "os-prober" package available

On 06/08/2020 01:16 AM, Tomas Pospisek wrote: On 08.06.20 04:40, Detlef Lechner wrote: Hi. I called in Debian stable in Firefox the website https://packages.debian.org/search?keywords=%22os-prober%22=names=all=all=mozilla-search and received the ANSWER: "Error. Suchbegriff ungültig oder nicht

Re: No information on "os-prober" package available

On 08.06.20 04:40, Detlef Lechner wrote: > Hi. > I called in Debian stable in Firefox the website > https://packages.debian.org/search?keywords=%22os-prober%22=names=all=all=mozilla-search > and received the ANSWER: "Error. Suchbegriff ungültig oder nicht > angegeben." How did that URL come

No information on "os-prober" package available

Hi. I called in Debian stable in Firefox the website https://packages.debian.org/search?keywords=%22os-prober%22=names=all=all=mozilla-search and received the ANSWER: "Error. Suchbegriff ungültig oder nicht angegeben." -- -- PGP-Fingerabdruck: 3419 7611 0F1E D429 2911 D5D7 9CAD 3BF1 3FFD FD6B

Some part of information outdated.

Hello. https://www.debian.org/devel/website/translating.en.html says *Note: *some part of information given below are outdated, especially everything that mentioned CVS. Please discard that part of information for now and help to update related instructions if possible. Update please

Bug#950186: marked as done (packages.debian.org: Please add information about maintainer scripts)

Your message dated Wed, 29 Jan 2020 20:53:09 -0800 with message-id and subject line Re: Bug#950186: packages.debian.org: Please add information about maintainer scripts has caused the Debian Bug report #950186, regarding packages.debian.org: Please add information about maintainer scripts

Bug#950186: packages.debian.org: Please add information about maintainer scripts

On Wed, 29 Jan 2020 13:27:15 -0800 Felix Lechner wrote: > For a deb package, packages.d.o can show a list of files, but that is > only the data section. Some information about maintainer scripts (such > as their presence) would be much appreciated. This service provides informat

Bug#950186: packages.debian.org: Please add information about maintainer scripts

Package: www.debian.org Severity: wishlist Hi, For a deb package, packages.d.o can show a list of files, but that is only the data section. Some information about maintainer scripts (such as their presence) would be much appreciated. Kind regards Felix Lechner

Accessibility of www.debian.org (Was: Reorganisation of www.debian.org: Please provide information about your Blend)

Hello, Fran Torres, le lun. 22 juil. 2019 11:40:36 +0200, a ecrit: > and... is not better follow the accessibility rules published on > https://www.w3.org > the WCAG V2.1 (web community accessibility guides)? > With this, the debian webpage can obtain the AA certification as minimum... Sure,

Re: Incorrect version tag used for Debian Stretch installation information

Hi, Le 09/07/2019 à 18:14, Niklas Elmose Andersen a écrit : > The Debian Stretch installation page ( > https://www.debian.org/releases/stretch/debian-installer/ ) has been > updated to point at 9.8.0 with the release of Buster, but the latest > release is 9.9.0. > See also: >

Incorrect version tag used for Debian Stretch installation information

The Debian Stretch installation page ( https://www.debian.org/releases/stretch/debian-installer/ ) has been updated to point at 9.8.0 with the release of Buster, but the latest release is 9.9.0. See also:

Re: Information about vendors of Debian installation media

On Sat, Mar 16, 2019 at 10:03 AM Mahfuzur Rahman wrote: > I want to know whether the installation media from these vendors are virus or > malware free? I want to build a virus free, secure system. I tried search > online to find any review for these vendors, there are any. Thus, I am > writing

Information about vendors of Debian installation media

Hello sir/madam, I want to Debian installation media from one of the vendors this website listed below: https://www.debian.org/CD/vendors/ I want to know whether the installation media from these vendors are virus or malware free? I want to build a virus free, secure system. I tried search

Bug#920436: packages.debian.org could use vcs edit information from vcswatch

Package: www.debian.org Severity: wishlist vcswatch allows users with a certificate from sso.debian.org to edit the Vcs-* information of packages. packages.d.o (and possibly other systems like tracker) could use that when showing Vcs links. Let me know if you like the idea an then I can provide

Bug#891143: marked as done (www.debian.org: Outdated information in "donation" web page)

Your message dated Mon, 03 Dec 2018 15:20:50 +0800 with message-id <300b59333cba5463746575fc36d3076e3f05adf9.ca...@debian.org> and subject line Re: Bug#891143: www.debian.org: Outdated information in "donation" web page has caused the Debian Bug report #891143, regarding www.debi

Bug#861781: www.debian.org: updating Debian memberships in other organisations information

Debian is also an affiliate member of the Open Source Initiative. I removed Desktop Linux Consortium and added the OSI to the membership page: https://salsa.debian.org/webmaster-team/webwml/merge_requests/44 Cheers, Molly

Processed: retitle 905355 to www.debian.org: link to list of mirrors does not contain expected information

Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > retitle 905355 www.debian.org: link to list of mirrors does not contain > expected information Bug #905355 [www.debian.org] link to list of mirrors does not contain expected information Changed Bug title to 'www.debian.org: link t

Processed: retitle 905355 to link to list of mirrors does not contain expected information

Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > retitle 905355 link to list of mirrors does not contain expected information Bug #905355 [www.debian.org] link to list of mirrors does containt expected information Changed Bug title to 'link to list of mirrors does not contain expec

Bug#905355: link to list of mirrors does containt expected information

Package: www.debian.org Severity: normal Dear webmasters, in distrib/index.wml we have the text You can download all of it from any of our mirrors. But ftplist.wml does not list the mirrors at all, instead it repeats a lot of other information and includes a link to the page which lists

Bug#902044: Request for an update of the Debian speaker's information

Thanks Geert for the bug report. I have added Jaminy's data to the speakers file, it will be online in the next hours. Cheers On Thu, 21 Jun 2018 22:24:30 +0200 Geert Stappers wrote: > Package: www.debian.org > > > Dear maintainers of www.debian.org, > > It this bugreport the proper way to

Bug#902044: marked as done (Request for an update of the Debian speaker's information)

Your message dated Mon, 30 Jul 2018 18:31:11 + with message-id <5b5f596fe845f_6b502b089a3510d867...@godard.mail> and subject line Bug #902044 in www.debian.org fixed has caused the Debian Bug report #902044, regarding Request for an update of the Debian speaker's information to be

Bug#902044: Request for an update of the Debian speaker's information

Package: www.debian.org Dear maintainers of www.debian.org, It this bugreport the proper way to request an update on https://www.debian.org/events/speakers/ ? If not: Please advice for further directions If yes: See below Cheers Geert Stappers Debian Developer Recieves e-mail sent to

Bug#891143: www.debian.org: Outdated information in "donation" web page

gt;> find >> >> "Italia: Associazione Software Libero" >> >> as donation options. >> Opening the link (http://www.softwarelibero.it/donazioni-debian) it's >> clear they stopped to collecting donations. >> Notice the page is in Italian. &

Bug#891143: www.debian.org: Outdated information in "donation" web page

tice the page is in Italian. > >I checked the english page and "Associazione Software Libero" is not >mentioned. >I suggest to remove this information. > > >-- System Information: >Debian Release: 9.3 > APT prefers stable > APT policy: (500, 'stable') >Arch

Bug#891143: www.debian.org: Outdated information in "donation" web page

collecting donations. Notice the page is in Italian. I checked the english page and "Associazione Software Libero" is not mentioned. I suggest to remove this information. -- System Information: Debian Release: 9.3 APT prefers stable APT policy: (500, 'stable') Architecture: am

SharePoint Users Contact List And Information

ot;margin-bottom:0.0001pt;line-height:normal">style="color:rgb(31,78,121);background-image:initial;background-position:initial;background-size:initial;background-repeat:initial;background-origin:initial;background-clip:initial">  style="color:rgb(31,78,121)">Inf

Re: To report a problem with the web site, e-mail our publicly archived mailing list debian-www@lists.debian.org. For other contact information, see the Debian contact page. Web site source code is av

On Fri, Aug 18, 2017 at 7:18 PM, Andrea Varga wrote: > To report a problem with the web site... Did you have a problem you would like to report? -- bye, pabs https://wiki.debian.org/PaulWise

To report a problem with the web site, e-mail our publicly archived mailing list debian-www@lists.debian.org. For other contact information, see the Debian contact page. Web site source code is availa

Bug#861781: www.debian.org: updating Debian memberships in other organisations information

If you want to, I can apply. On Fri, May 05, 2017 at 09:41:29AM +0800, Paul Wise wrote: > On Fri, 2017-05-05 at 09:38 +0800, Raphael Hertzog wrote: > > On Thu, 04 May 2017, Paul Wise wrote: > > > Reconfirm the involvement of these representatives: > > > SchoolForge (representatives: Ben

Bug#861781: www.debian.org: updating Debian memberships in other organisations information

That would be a dream. C'mon guys, anyone? On 04/05/17 22:41, Paul Wise wrote: On Fri, 2017-05-05 at 09:38 +0800, Raphael Hertzog wrote: On Thu, 04 May 2017, Paul Wise wrote: Reconfirm the involvement of these representatives: SchoolForge (representatives: Ben Armstrong*, Raphaël Hertzog)

Bug#861781: www.debian.org: updating Debian memberships in other organisations information

On Fri, 2017-05-05 at 09:38 +0800, Raphael Hertzog wrote: > On Thu, 04 May 2017, Paul Wise wrote: > > Reconfirm the involvement of these representatives: > > SchoolForge (representatives: Ben Armstrong*, Raphaël Hertzog) > > You can drop me as representative here. Since Ben is retired from

Bug#861781: www.debian.org: updating Debian memberships in other organisations information

Hi, On Thu, 04 May 2017, Paul Wise wrote: > Reconfirm the involvement of these representatives: > SchoolForge (representatives: Ben Armstrong*, Raphaël Hertzog) You can drop me as representative here, I did not even remember that I accepted to be a reprensative in that organization. I haven't

Bug#861781: www.debian.org: updating Debian memberships in other organisations information

(representative: Wichert Akkerman*) SchoolForge (representatives: Ben Armstrong*, Raphaël Hertzog) OASIS: Organization for the Advancement of Structured Information Standards (representative: Mark Johnson*) Reconfirm the involvement of these representatives: Linux International (representative

Bug#621490: marked as done (packages.debian.org: information missing http://packages.debian.org/sid/deroff (debports pkg))

Your message dated Sat, 11 Mar 2017 14:24:43 +0800 with message-id <1489213483.27304.12.ca...@debian.org> and subject line Re: www.debian.org: package information missing (to the right) at http://packages.debian.org/sid/deroff has caused the Debian Bug report #621490, reg

Bug#264589: Link from packages.debian.org to manpages.debian.net - updated information (bug 264589)

sub do_show { $contents{downloads} = \@downloads; # + # File contents on amd64 + # + $contents{contents} = []; + pkg_files('amd64', $suite, $pkg, $contents{contents}); + + # # more information # moreinfo( name => $pkg, data => $page, vars => \%contents, @@ -526,6 +5

Who's using Debian entry: Information Technology Center, University of the Philippines Los Baños, Philippines

Dear Debian user, We are in the process of updating the “Who's using Debian?” web page[1] on which you have an entry[2]. Please let us know if the information posted is still relevant or if there have been any changes in your use of Debian, so that we may update your informational entry

TEMENOS Information

Hi, We would like to learn your interest in acquiring our updated TEMENOS user's contacts list for your business development campaigns. You may also be interested in technology users list like: Finacle, Avaloq, Flex cube, Sap and some more. We specialize in providing the top Decision Makers

Bug#826575: marked as done (PXEBootinstall page is missing vital information)

Your message dated Tue, 7 Jun 2016 15:17:31 +0100 with message-id <20160607141731.ge5...@einval.com> and subject line Re: Bug#826575: PXEBootinstall page is missing vital information has caused the Debian Bug report #826575, regarding PXEBootinstall page is missing vital information to be

Bug#826575: PXEBootinstall page is missing vital information

Package: wiki.debian.org Severity: important The page https://wiki.debian.org/PXEBootInstall talks about providing the netboot image, unpacking it and then "should now contain" and there is pxelinux.* files! It does not say where these files come from (links from the looks of it). The

Bug#815202: packages: machines and sponsors information is outdated

On Mon, Apr 18, 2016 at 5:47 AM, Stéphane Blondon wrote: > https://github.com/Debian/ud is the future for the ldap web interface > (db.debian.org), not for packages.debian.org, isn't it? Correct. -- bye, pabs https://wiki.debian.org/PaulWise

Bug#815202: packages: machines and sponsors information is outdated

Le 05/04/2016 07:06, Paul Wise a écrit : > On Tue, Apr 5, 2016 at 9:05 AM, Stéphane Blondon wrote: > >> There are no commit since two years, so I'm not sure it's still alive. > > Nevertheless, it is the way forward. Perhaps I am wrong but https://github.com/Debian/ud is the future for the

Bug#815202: packages: machines and sponsors information is outdated

Le 05/04/2016 07:06, Paul Wise a écrit : > On Tue, Apr 5, 2016 at 9:05 AM, Stéphane Blondon wrote: > >> There are no commit since two years, so I'm not sure it's still alive. > > Nevertheless, it is the way forward. > >> I tried to extract the useful code from the script. It depends on the >>

Bug#815202: packages: machines and sponsors information is outdated

On Tue, Apr 5, 2016 at 9:05 AM, Stéphane Blondon wrote: > There are no commit since two years, so I'm not sure it's still alive. Nevertheless, it is the way forward. > I tried to extract the useful code from the script. It depends on the > libnet-ldapapi-perl package and the configuration of

Bug#815202: packages: machines and sponsors information is outdated

Le 01/04/2016 06:43, Paul Wise a écrit : > DSA would very much like to kill the existing codebase behind the > db.d.o website in favour of a rewrite in django: > > https://github.com/Debian/ud There are no commit since two years, so I'm not sure it's still alive. > The existing codebase is

Bug#815202: packages: machines and sponsors information is outdated

On Fri, Apr 1, 2016 at 7:21 AM, Stéphane Blondon wrote: > I don't know in which repository ./machines.cgi is (at least not in the > website repo). DSA would very much like to kill the existing codebase behind the db.d.o website in favour of a rewrite in django: https://github.com/Debian/ud The

Bug#815202: packages: machines and sponsors information is outdated

Le 29/03/2016 10:31, Frank Lichtenheld a écrit : > On Sat, 20 Feb 2016 09:26:23 +0800 Paul Wise wrote: >> Some combination of >> the description, purpose, sponsor and allowedGroups LDAP fields should >> be enough to find the right hosts and display the right info. picconi >>

Bug#815202: packages: machines and sponsors information is outdated

decommissioned a long time ago. It would be best to generate > the machines and sponsors info from Debian LDAP on a regular basis so > that this information never gets out of date. Some combination of > the description, purpose, sponsor and allowedGroups LDAP fields should > be eno

Bug#815202: packages: machines and sponsors information is outdated

on a regular basis so that this information never gets out of date. Some combination of the description, purpose, sponsor and allowedGroups LDAP fields should be enough to find the right hosts and display the right info. picconi and pkgmirror-1and1 are the current hosts for this service. https

Missing information at https://www.debian.org/CD/verify

First sentence says "Official releases of Debian CDs come with signed checksum files." However no indication given where to find those "checksum files". See thread at https://lists.debian.org/debian-cd/2015/11/msg0.html .

Re: Missing information at https://www.debian.org/CD/verify

On Sun, Nov 01, 2015 at 07:46:40AM -0600, Richard Owlett wrote: >First sentence says "Official releases of Debian CDs come with signed >checksum files." >However no indication given where to find those "checksum files". >See thread at https://lists.debian.org/debian-cd/2015/11/msg0.html . ACK

Wrong size information

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 Hi. At page https://www.debian.org/distrib/netinst in czech variant is at netinstall images this description: Soubory s obrazy disků do velikosti 2800 MB. Zvolte si architekturu procesoru. At same page in english is this: The following are image

Re: Wrong size information

Hi Vojtěch El 17/10/15 a las 14:37, Vojtěch Vladyka escribió: > > Hi. > At page https://www.debian.org/distrib/netinst in czech variant is at > netinstall images this description: > Soubory s obrazy disků do velikosti 2800 MB. Zvolte si architekturu > procesoru. > > At same page in english is

Bug#773660: marked as done (www.debian.org(/security) misses critical information)

information to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this message

Bug#773660: www.debian.org(/security) misses critical information

package: www.debian.org severity: important x-debbugs-cc: t...@security.debian.org Hi, verbatin from #debian-security: h01ger | the german version of http://www.debian.org/ only show dsa-3091 from december 7 as latest h01ger | oh, same for http://www.debian.org/index.en.html h01ger |

[New Entry information ] as Debian CD vendor]]

Hi, i did not receive this email with form through website. (following question asked on Message-Id: Message-ID: CANarOZoAJhFnKi8uGVN-b2_J+NXGrTYZfNX2K1by=mykzsp...@mail.gmail.com Cheers, Alexandre - Forwarded message from Steins, Sebastian A. sebast...@sebastiansteins.com - Date: Fri,

VORTEX MAIL SPECIAL INFORMATION 2014.9.25

◆◇最新物件情報!! ◇◆ ≪　事業系区分所有のパイオニア　≫ 　☆ボルテックス通信☆2014年9月25日配信 　 オフィスは “ 借りる ” もの。 そんな風に決めつけていませんか？

Misleading information on the debian armel manual

Hi, Sorry for not reporting this bug using debian's bug tracking system, however for a newbie acustomed to bugzilla the tracking systems looks quite complex. In my opinion, the documentation for the arm eabi port contains quite misleading information in https://www.debian.org/releases/stable

Re: Misleading information on the debian armel manual

On Sun, Aug 24, 2014 at 6:35 AM, Clemens Eisserer wrote: In my opinion, the documentation for the arm eabi port contains quite misleading information Please contact the debian-arm list about this issue. https://lists.debian.org/debian-arm/ -- bye, pabs https://wiki.debian.org/PaulWise

Bug#645709: marked as done (www.debian.org: Debian “squeeze” Installation Information , errata outdated?)

Your message dated Sat, 16 Aug 2014 10:29:15 -0400 with message-id 20140816142914.ga8...@mikado.tilapin.org and subject line Re: Bug#645709: www.debian.org: Debian “squeeze” Installation Information , errata outdated? has caused the Debian Bug report #645709, regarding www.debian.org: Debian

Wrong information on a specific page of the wiki

Hi, The following entry is not actual, and that is wrong: https://wiki.debian.org/DebianInstaller/FAQ#Q:_Does_the_DebianInstaller_support_creating_and_installing_to_software_RAID_devices.3F As far as i know GRUB2 supports booting on a linux software raid. Please update the page. I don't have

Information from the packages pages

to make a backport, or whatever, I like to see which dependencies has that package to be built. I have not found this information in any place except the control file in the source package. So, always I must download the source and then check that file. I have no idea how are generated

Re: Information from the packages pages

. When I check for a package, because I would like to make a backport, or whatever, I like to see which dependencies has that package to be built. I have not found this information in any place except the control file in the source package. So, always I must download the source and then check

Re: Information from the packages pages

://packages.debian.org/jessie/package-source I always miss the build depends field. When I check for a package, because I would like to make a backport, or whatever, I like to see which dependencies has that package to be built. I have not found this information in any place except

Re: Information from the packages pages

* Leopold Palomo-Avellaneda l...@alaxarxa.net [2014-05-07 11:15:22 CEST]: A Dimecres, 7 de maig de 2014, Adam D. Barratt va escriure: Are you looking for https://packages.debian.org/source/jessie/$package ? :-D yes but it's not easy to access. One link from:

Re: Information from the packages pages

that this kind of changes needs a lot of consensus and I would like to hear more opinions about that, but I think that it could be more clear is shows that are targeting to the source information and not to the debian distro. Rereading again the mail, and reading again the page I see that put on the top

  1   2   3   4   >