--On Mon, Oct 12, 1998 2:47 am -0300 Nicolás Lichtmaier
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
There's absolutelly no reason for doing so. You aren't
following the stamdard more closely with that.
Oh yes, there is a reason. Using omittags to the fullest extent,
one may indeed get rid of a lot of markup,
--On Mon, Oct 12, 1998 10:40 am +0200 Dirk Niemeyer
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
We should also consider using height=xxx and width=xxx for the IMG
tag
as this makes rendering easier for the browsers. I always sit in front
of
an empty display for a while and the browser tells me it is loading
The specific problem with the p tags is that many people misunderstand
them, and many browsers appear to interpret p tags the way that people
expect them to work (i.e. put some space here) rather than the way they
should work.
It's amazing to see the Big Companies, with their Big Bucks,
On 11-Oct-98 Jules Bean wrote:
--On Sat, Oct 10, 1998 10:32 pm +0200 Philipp Frauenfelder
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
This is a niggle, but we're professionals here.
That's not the correct use of the p tag. The p tag is a container for a
paragraph, as in pThis is a short paragraph/p.
Darren Benham [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
However, I always thought that P stand-alone was how the paragraph tag was
orginially defined and therefore would be historicly correct...
Not only historicaly but also by definition. Here is a quotation
from
---snip
9.3.1 Paragraphs: the P
--On Sun, Oct 11, 1998 6:59 pm +0200 Jacob Sparre Andersen
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Philipp:
| Summary: no end tag required but discouraged for additional
| white space (empty paragraph).
The end tag is _not_ discouraged. It is not _necessary_. The extra space
you get in Netscape when
On 10-Oct-98 Philipp Frauenfelder wrote:
Secondly, I've encountered already two pages which don't have a
real good layout:
Go ahead and make those changes if they're not already done.
=
* http://benham.net/index.html
7 matches
Mail list logo
