have aside tools that downloaded that file from the FTP site, and
locally checked the md5sums.
AFAICS in bug 268658 you propose to ship a signed 'Checksums-${ARCH}.gz'
with releases.
What I had in mind was slightly broader, though.
What I have in mind is a database containing all checksums
the md5sum
for each image near the download link, or link the MD5SUMS page on the
download pages?
This information is obviously of interest to most people visiting these
pages.
Thanks
--
Ben Parkins
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble
(they are smaller than a CDROM max size.)
Also the MD5SUMS never match. Have the wrong images been place up on the
servers or are the MD5SUMS wrong.
The correct forum for this question is debian-cd@lists.debian.org, so
I've sent this reply there.
It is most likely a problem with your download
Hi,
I have tried to download the Debia 3.1r0a DVD ISO images form many
sites. In most case the size of the images reported on the download site do
not reflect the downloaded size (they are smaller than a CDROM max size.)
Also the MD5SUMS never match. Have the wrong images been
.)
Also the MD5SUMS never match. Have the wrong images been place up on the
servers or are the MD5SUMS wrong.
The correct forum for this question is debian-cd@lists.debian.org, so
I've sent this reply there.
--
Matt
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
I have downloaded a debian-installer CD-image from
http://www.bg.debian.org/devel/debian-installer/
but - before starting to play around with it too much - I want to know I
didn't get a corrupt copy .. but can't find any md5sums on the page ..?
Is it a good idea to add some (please)?, or have I
On Sat, Aug 28, 2004 at 04:49:14PM +0200, Ingo Wilken wrote:
This list is rather useless - it only shows the file name and the
package name for every file contained in the package. It should also
provide the MD5 hash of every file. This would help for quick manual
checks whether an installed
Package: www.debian.org
On the individual package pages (for example
http://packages.debian.org/testing/base/procps) there are links to
show the list of files of this package for every architecture (under
the download buttons).
This list is rather useless - it only shows the file name and the
Hello I'm downloadind the sid cdroms (dated 13.04.2004/14.04.2004) could
you give me the md5sums of these cdroms ?
Best regards.
Michael.
* Michael [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2004-04-28 11:43]:
Hello I'm downloadind the sid cdroms (dated 13.04.2004/14.04.2004) could
you give me the md5sums of these cdroms ?
Where did you download them? The md5sums should be sitting next to
them. From what I know they are regularly regenerated, so I
Martin Schulze:
Please add ``MD5 checksum:'' in front of them.
...as a tag, so that it can be translated.
--
\\//
peter - http://www.softwolves.pp.se/
Statement concerning unsolicited e-mail according to Swedish law:
http://www.softwolves.pp.se/peter/reklampost.html
peter karlsson wrote:
Martin Schulze:
Please add ``MD5 checksum:'' in front of them.
...as a tag, so that it can be translated.
Surely.
Regards,
Joey
--
We all know Linux is great... it does infinite loops in 5 seconds.
- Linus Torvalds
Please always Cc to me when
Hi,
Joey requested that MD5 checksums are put in security advisories on the web
pages, so I've added them, in a kludgey kinda way. Should we add a
description before them, and thus a new tag? peterk?
--
Digital Electronic Being Intended for Assassination and Nullification
On Tue, Apr 24, 2001 at 03:59:37PM -0500, James A. Treacy wrote:
small(md5sum: 443f1d654d499f8e62cede1c1b941dd6)/small
md5sum could be a tag if it needs to be translated.
I think it should.
Marcin
--
Marcin Owsiany [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://student.uci.agh.edu.pl/~porridge/
GnuPG:
14 matches
Mail list logo
