Re: package of the week

2003-09-06 Thread Josip Rodin
On Thu, Sep 04, 2003 at 06:25:43PM +0200, Frank Lichtenheld wrote: > > Where should we put this? d.o/News/pow and packages.d.o/POW > > have both been suggested. I have no preference. > > I would say debian.org > It's much, much simpler. I would say p.d.o because it's negligibly more to type and

Re: package of the week

2003-09-04 Thread Frank Lichtenheld
On Wed, Sep 03, 2003 at 10:50:28AM -0700, Andre Lehovich wrote: > Could someone who knows WML well look at the source and let > me know if there are any changes that need to be made? Is > this format easy for translators to use? The pow.wml file > includes some new tags like and to > facilitate

package of the week

2003-09-03 Thread Andre Lehovich
I've put up a new draft of the package of the week section. The final results (minus index.html files) are at: http://www.u.arizona.edu/~andrel/pow/www/News/pow/ The WML source code is at: http://www.u.arizona.edu/~andrel/pow/webwml/english/News/pow/ http://www.u.arizona.edu/~andrel/pow/w

Re: package of the week

2003-03-21 Thread Martin Schulze
Andre L. wrote: > > I am not really sure why you chose png for the > > r-project pictures, jpg should suffice, shouldn't it? > > Because in this case (only two colors, with most of the image a solid > background color) the PNG were a lot smaller. I could degrade the JPEG > quality > down, but th

Re: package of the week

2003-03-18 Thread Andre L.
--- Osamu Aoki <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > If you make any SGML/WML/HTML type contents, please consider to add > following items included in the source file in a consistent manner. > [... good ideas deleted ...] > This should help indexing them in the future. Willdo. I'm slowly getting the ha

Re: package of the week

2003-03-17 Thread Andre L.
-- Gerfried Fuchs <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > And therefore you should just use links of the style: > http://packages.debian.org/ Willdo -- didn't know that worked. > I am not really sure why you chose png for the > r-project pictures, jpg should suffice, shouldn't it? Because in this case (on

Re: package of the week

2003-03-10 Thread Osamu Aoki
Hi, On Wed, Mar 05, 2003 at 08:12:19PM -0800, Andre L. wrote: > During a conversation about possible improvements to DWN, > Joey Schulze suggested getting the old package of the week > (POW) idea going again. [1] The plan is each week we'd > review one featured package on deb

Re: package of the week

2003-03-10 Thread Martin Schulze
Andre L. wrote: > During a conversation about possible improvements to DWN, > Joey Schulze suggested getting the old package of the week > (POW) idea going again. [1] The plan is each week we'd > review one featured package on debian.org (probably > somewhere under News/), wi

Re: package of the week

2003-03-06 Thread Gerfried Fuchs
* Andre L. <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2003-03-05 20:12]: > I'm also going to need some help with WML code for > headers/footers, and to provide a link to the Debian package > page, since that URL might change in the future. And therefore you should just use links of the style: http://packages.debian.or

package of the week

2003-03-05 Thread Andre L.
During a conversation about possible improvements to DWN, Joey Schulze suggested getting the old package of the week (POW) idea going again. [1] The plan is each week we'd review one featured package on debian.org (probably somewhere under News/), with a link in the DWN issue. I've agre