On Thu, Sep 04, 2003 at 06:25:43PM +0200, Frank Lichtenheld wrote:
> > Where should we put this? d.o/News/pow and packages.d.o/POW
> > have both been suggested. I have no preference.
>
> I would say debian.org
> It's much, much simpler.
I would say p.d.o because it's negligibly more to type and
On Wed, Sep 03, 2003 at 10:50:28AM -0700, Andre Lehovich wrote:
> Could someone who knows WML well look at the source and let
> me know if there are any changes that need to be made? Is
> this format easy for translators to use? The pow.wml file
> includes some new tags like and to
> facilitate
I've put up a new draft of the package of the week section.
The final results (minus index.html files) are at:
http://www.u.arizona.edu/~andrel/pow/www/News/pow/
The WML source code is at:
http://www.u.arizona.edu/~andrel/pow/webwml/english/News/pow/
http://www.u.arizona.edu/~andrel/pow/w
Andre L. wrote:
> > I am not really sure why you chose png for the
> > r-project pictures, jpg should suffice, shouldn't it?
>
> Because in this case (only two colors, with most of the image a solid
> background color) the PNG were a lot smaller. I could degrade the JPEG
> quality
> down, but th
--- Osamu Aoki <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> If you make any SGML/WML/HTML type contents, please consider to add
> following items included in the source file in a consistent manner.
> [... good ideas deleted ...]
> This should help indexing them in the future.
Willdo. I'm slowly getting the ha
-- Gerfried Fuchs <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> And therefore you should just use links of the style:
> http://packages.debian.org/
Willdo -- didn't know that worked.
> I am not really sure why you chose png for the
> r-project pictures, jpg should suffice, shouldn't it?
Because in this case (on
Hi,
On Wed, Mar 05, 2003 at 08:12:19PM -0800, Andre L. wrote:
> During a conversation about possible improvements to DWN,
> Joey Schulze suggested getting the old package of the week
> (POW) idea going again. [1] The plan is each week we'd
> review one featured package on deb
Andre L. wrote:
> During a conversation about possible improvements to DWN,
> Joey Schulze suggested getting the old package of the week
> (POW) idea going again. [1] The plan is each week we'd
> review one featured package on debian.org (probably
> somewhere under News/), wi
* Andre L. <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2003-03-05 20:12]:
> I'm also going to need some help with WML code for
> headers/footers, and to provide a link to the Debian package
> page, since that URL might change in the future.
And therefore you should just use links of the style:
http://packages.debian.or
During a conversation about possible improvements to DWN,
Joey Schulze suggested getting the old package of the week
(POW) idea going again. [1] The plan is each week we'd
review one featured package on debian.org (probably
somewhere under News/), with a link in the DWN issue. I've
agre
10 matches
Mail list logo