Re: possible inconsistency in www.debian.org/security/nonvulns-sarge.src

2007-12-18 Thread Simon Paillard
On Tue, Dec 18, 2007 at 12:01:19PM +0100, Cyrille Bollu wrote: > yet another problem "lifererea" (CVE-2007-5751) doesn't seem to exist... > But "liferea" does. Fixed. -- Simon Paillard -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTE

Re: possible inconsistency in www.debian.org/security/nonvulns-sarge.src

2007-12-18 Thread Cyrille Bollu
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hi again, yet another problem "lifererea" (CVE-2007-5751) doesn't seem to exist... But "liferea" does. Best regards, Cyrille Simon Paillard wrote: > On Mon, Dec 17, 2007 at 01:32:41PM +0100, Cyrille Bollu wrote: >> Hi, > > Hi here Cyrille ! > >> I'

Re: possible inconsistency in www.debian.org/security/nonvulns-sarge.src

2007-12-17 Thread Simon Paillard
On Mon, Dec 17, 2007 at 01:32:41PM +0100, Cyrille Bollu wrote: > Hi, Hi here Cyrille ! > I'm currently translating for [EMAIL PROTECTED] the > web page in subject and have found a possible inconsistency in there: > > The vulnerability CVE-2007-1463 seems to be inconsistent. Its > description doe

possible inconsistency in www.debian.org/security/nonvulns-sarge.src

2007-12-17 Thread Cyrille Bollu
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hi, I'm currently translating for [EMAIL PROTECTED] the web page in subject and have found a possible inconsistency in there: The vulnerability CVE-2007-1463 seems to be inconsistent. Its description doesn't match this reference but instead matches C