On Wed, Feb 17, 1999 at 10:42:27PM -0500, Michael Stone wrote:
> I'm thinking about making this a priority this weekend.
Well, that didn't happen. :( But it's finally nearing completion. :) I'm
soliciting suggestions on a couple of final issues: first, where should the
configuration info go (is i
On Wed, Feb 17, 1999 at 11:22:37PM -0500, James A. Treacy wrote:
> I'm still leaning toward simply having the security pages link the relevant
> page in the Packages section of the web site and deal with linking packages
> in proposed-updates directory there. Only security updates are supposed to
>
On Wed, Feb 17, 1999 at 10:42:27PM -0500, Michael Stone wrote:
> Any more thoughts on making the security urls track updates in the ftp site?
> I'm looking at a lot of stuff that needs to be updated right now, and I'd
> prefer to just update once to a "Right Way" than to make a short-term patch.
>
On Wed, Feb 17, 1999 at 10:42:27PM -0500, Michael Stone wrote:
> Any more thoughts on making the security urls track updates in the ftp site?
> I'm looking at a lot of stuff that needs to be updated right now, and I'd
> prefer to just update once to a "Right Way" than to make a short-term patch.
>
Any more thoughts on making the security urls track updates in the ftp site?
I'm looking at a lot of stuff that needs to be updated right now, and I'd
prefer to just update once to a "Right Way" than to make a short-term patch.
(Unless the Right Way looks like it might be delayed. :) I'm thinking a
5 matches
Mail list logo
