> > > why do you use jpeg compression for the debian logo:
> > > http://www.debian.org/Pics/debian.jpg
> > > This image is 8442 bytes.
> > > Using gif or png compression you can dramatically reduce the size.
> > > The attached png has just 1346 bytes.
> >
> > png isn't supported by all browsers
>
On Wed, Mar 20, 2002 at 11:32:05PM +0100, Michael Schmitz wrote:
> why do you use jpeg compression for the debian logo:
> http://www.debian.org/Pics/debian.jpg
> This image is 8442 bytes.
> Using gif or png compression you can dramatically reduce the size.
> The attached png has just 1346 bytes.
P
* timothy bauscher <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2002-03-20 21:26]:
> png isn't supported by all browsers
FUD? Sorry, but using of png for non-transparent stuff is fully
encouraged, especially for things where true colors count, like in this
case.
> gif is patented, software patents suck.
Yep, that's
On Wed, 20 Mar 2002 21:26:15 -0500
timothy bauscher <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > why do you use jpeg compression for the debian logo:
> > http://www.debian.org/Pics/debian.jpg
> > This image is 8442 bytes.
> > Using gif or png compression you can dramatically reduce the size.
> > The attached pn
> why do you use jpeg compression for the debian logo:
> http://www.debian.org/Pics/debian.jpg
> This image is 8442 bytes.
> Using gif or png compression you can dramatically reduce the size.
> The attached png has just 1346 bytes.
png isn't supported by all browsers
gif is patented, software pat
Hi,
why do you use jpeg compression for the debian logo:
http://www.debian.org/Pics/debian.jpg
This image is 8442 bytes.
Using gif or png compression you can dramatically reduce the size.
The attached png has just 1346 bytes.
Regards
Michael Schmitz
debian.png
Description: PNG image
6 matches
Mail list logo