Please send messages to the debian-x mailing list, not to me privately.
On Fri, Sep 22, 2000 at 01:18:25PM +0200, Patrick Mauritz wrote:
> I'm just downloading your packages of xf401. Why is there a dependency of
> xlib6g-dev to xlibs-dev? xlibs-dev is quite large and I don't think that
> static
Please reply to the debian-x mailing list, not to me privately.
On Fri, Sep 22, 2000 at 12:32:04PM +0200, Vedran Rodic wrote:
> On Fri, Sep 22, 2000 at 01:52:12AM -0500, Branden Robinson wrote:
> > There is not yet official Debian policy on this matter, but I'm starting to
> > realize we need one
On Sun, Sep 24, 2000 at 01:12:48AM +0200, Marcelo E. Magallon wrote:
> >> Joshua Shagam <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > Okay, since posting my original message, I've found out (with
> > Marcelo Magallon's help) that I need to get a DRI driver which
> > matches interfaces with the XFree server
On Fri, Sep 22, 2000 at 01:03:10PM +0200, Vedran Rodic wrote:
> I originally blamed 2.4.0.9.4 kernel, and if not that, then NVIDIA non-free
> drivers maybe conflicting with latest X cvs changes,
> but since you've reported it, I started to doubt in X itself.
Just to note, I didn't have any more
1.) I recently upgraded to kernel 2.4.0-test9pre1, in doing so I rebuilt my
mga.o drm module. At this point I was using 4.0.1-0phase2v7, and X
would refuse to start, reporting "DRM version = 2.0.0, expected 1.0.x".
As of phase2v8, X starts fine, but I still recieve an error as follows:
On Sun, Sep 24, 2000 at 01:12:48AM +0200, Marcelo E. Magallon wrote:
> >> Joshua Shagam <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > Okay, since posting my original message, I've found out (with
> > Marcelo Magallon's help) that I need to get a DRI driver which
> > matches interfaces with the XFree serve
On Fri, Sep 22, 2000 at 01:03:10PM +0200, Vedran Rodic wrote:
> I originally blamed 2.4.0.9.4 kernel, and if not that, then NVIDIA non-free
> drivers maybe conflicting with latest X cvs changes,
> but since you've reported it, I started to doubt in X itself.
Just to note, I didn't have any mor
>> Joshua Shagam <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Okay, since posting my original message, I've found out (with
> Marcelo Magallon's help) that I need to get a DRI driver which
> matches interfaces with the XFree server. As far as I can tell,
> the current Matrox driver (which is based on PI's C
1.) I recently upgraded to kernel 2.4.0-test9pre1, in doing so I rebuilt my
mga.o drm module. At this point I was using 4.0.1-0phase2v7, and X
would refuse to start, reporting "DRM version = 2.0.0, expected 1.0.x".
As of phase2v8, X starts fine, but I still recieve an error as follows
Okay, since posting my original message, I've found out (with Marcelo
Magallon's help) that I need to get a DRI driver which matches interfaces
with the XFree server. As far as I can tell, the current Matrox driver
(which is based on PI's CVS-current driver) uses the 2.0.0 interface,
whereas the
Can we get eo_EO and eo_EO.ISO8859-3 added to locale.alias as aliases
for eo_XX.ISO8859-3? It's not correct, as EO isn't a valid country code
(if it is, we aren't using it as intended), but (Debian's) libc currently
supports eo_EO and not eo_XX, and since the short-term fix is easier for
X, I f
>> Joshua Shagam <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Okay, since posting my original message, I've found out (with
> Marcelo Magallon's help) that I need to get a DRI driver which
> matches interfaces with the XFree server. As far as I can tell,
> the current Matrox driver (which is based on PI's
* [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [000923 13:20]:
> Where did you get the Matrox binary drivers? There is only source in the
> Matrox
> homepage, but binaries are mentioned in the README. I don't want to compile
> the
> whole Xfree-sources ;)
It took me a lot of searching on their webpage
On Sat, 23 Sep 2000 22:45:41 Seth Arnold wrote:
> Joshua, first, let me make it clear I am far from knowledgeable about
> this subject. :)
>
> I am pretty sure I didn't do much special to get DRI working on my g400
> max. I am running branden's .debs, the matrox driver, and kernel
> 2.4.0-test7.
Joshua, first, let me make it clear I am far from knowledgeable about
this subject. :)
I am pretty sure I didn't do much special to get DRI working on my g400
max. I am running branden's .debs, the matrox driver, and kernel
2.4.0-test7. I ensured that the agpgart module and mga kernel module
were
Okay, since posting my original message, I've found out (with Marcelo
Magallon's help) that I need to get a DRI driver which matches interfaces
with the XFree server. As far as I can tell, the current Matrox driver
(which is based on PI's CVS-current driver) uses the 2.0.0 interface,
whereas the
Can we get eo_EO and eo_EO.ISO8859-3 added to locale.alias as aliases
for eo_XX.ISO8859-3? It's not correct, as EO isn't a valid country code
(if it is, we aren't using it as intended), but (Debian's) libc currently
supports eo_EO and not eo_XX, and since the short-term fix is easier for
X, I
* [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [000923 13:20]:
> Where did you get the Matrox binary drivers? There is only source in the Matrox
> homepage, but binaries are mentioned in the README. I don't want to compile the
> whole Xfree-sources ;)
It took me a lot of searching on their webpage to fi
On Sat, 23 Sep 2000 22:45:41 Seth Arnold wrote:
> Joshua, first, let me make it clear I am far from knowledgeable about
> this subject. :)
>
> I am pretty sure I didn't do much special to get DRI working on my g400
> max. I am running branden's .debs, the matrox driver, and kernel
> 2.4.0-test7.
Joshua, first, let me make it clear I am far from knowledgeable about
this subject. :)
I am pretty sure I didn't do much special to get DRI working on my g400
max. I am running branden's .debs, the matrox driver, and kernel
2.4.0-test7. I ensured that the agpgart module and mga kernel module
were
On Sat, Sep 23, 2000 at 09:27:21AM -0600, Joshua Shagam wrote:
> Has anyone built the G400 DRI module against kernel 2.2.17? I don't even
> need this for game playing - I need this for my research. 3D graphics
> research really sucks on software Mesa. :) Any help would be greatly
> appreciated.
Hello, I've just upgraded my XFree 3.3.6 to 4.0.1 using these wonderful
packages, and haven't had any problems. Except one... I need the DRI
driver for my G400. Specifically, I'm trying to use Matrox's
binary-distributed one, and as it turns out, they only distribute a binary
version of the 2D dr
On Sat, Sep 23, 2000 at 09:27:21AM -0600, Joshua Shagam wrote:
> Has anyone built the G400 DRI module against kernel 2.2.17? I don't even
> need this for game playing - I need this for my research. 3D graphics
> research really sucks on software Mesa. :) Any help would be greatly
> appreciated
Hello, I've just upgraded my XFree 3.3.6 to 4.0.1 using these wonderful
packages, and haven't had any problems. Except one... I need the DRI
driver for my G400. Specifically, I'm trying to use Matrox's
binary-distributed one, and as it turns out, they only distribute a binary
version of the 2D d
Travis Whitton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> I'm using linux 2.4.0-test8 with DRI support and the r128 module(for my
> Rage 128 card). Whenever I run any Mesa based applications, they flicker
> constantly and improperly render certain parts of the screen. A good
> example of this behavior can be se
Travis Whitton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> I'm using linux 2.4.0-test8 with DRI support and the r128 module(for my
> Rage 128 card). Whenever I run any Mesa based applications, they flicker
> constantly and improperly render certain parts of the screen. A good
> example of this behavior can be s
26 matches
Mail list logo
