imlib brokenness?

2000-10-01 Thread Lalo Martins
Just felt like sharing this with you guys. I first tried X4 with the v9 (IIRC) debs, where SHM was broken. Someone on the list suggested that disabling SHM in imlib could help, so I did that. My other apps who depend on SHM (gqmpeg, mostly) started working again as soon as I restarted GNOME. Bu

Updated Debian XFree86 4.x mini-FAQ and status report

2000-10-01 Thread Branden Robinson
Feel free reproduce this mail anywhere you like. Reply to the list . Do not send mail to me privately. * To use DRI you need a proper kernel version (not to mention a card supported by current DRI code). Unfortunately there is no official Linux kernel with the proper support. Use the lates

Updated Debian XFree86 4.x mini-FAQ and status report

2000-10-01 Thread Branden Robinson
Feel free reproduce this mail anywhere you like. Reply to the list <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>. Do not send mail to me privately. * To use DRI you need a proper kernel version (not to mention a card supported by current DRI code). Unfortunately there is no official Linux kernel with the proper sup

Re: XFree86 4.0

2000-10-01 Thread Sean
You need to put the following lines in your sources.list -> deb http://samosa.debian.org/%7Ebranden/ woody/i386/ deb-src http://samosa.debian.org/%7Ebranden/ woody/source/ the bottom one is only needed if you want sources Also you must realize that these are very experimental packages, an

Re: XFree86 4.0

2000-10-01 Thread Jens Müller
- Original Message - From: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Jens Müller" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Sunday, October 01, 2000 5:13 PM Subject: Re: XFree86 4.0 > > On Sun, 01 Oct 2000 18:07:57 Jens Müller wrote: > > Hi! > > > > Just a short question: When will XFree86 4.0 be packaged for Debian (wo

XFree86 4.0

2000-10-01 Thread Jens Müller
Hi! Just a short question: When will XFree86 4.0 be packaged for Debian (woody)? Or are there sources where I can already get it? Jens

Re: XFree86 4.0

2000-10-01 Thread Sean
You need to put the following lines in your sources.list -> deb http://samosa.debian.org/%7Ebranden/ woody/i386/ deb-src http://samosa.debian.org/%7Ebranden/ woody/source/ the bottom one is only needed if you want sources Also you must realize that these are very experimental packages, a

Re: XFree86 4.0

2000-10-01 Thread Jens Müller
- Original Message - From: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Jens Müller" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Sunday, October 01, 2000 5:13 PM Subject: Re: XFree86 4.0 > > On Sun, 01 Oct 2000 18:07:57 Jens Müller wrote: > > Hi! > > > > Just a short question: When will XFree86 4.0 be packaged for Debian (w

XFree86 4.0

2000-10-01 Thread Jens Müller
Hi! Just a short question: When will XFree86 4.0 be packaged for Debian (woody)? Or are there sources where I can already get it? Jens -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: phase2v12, 2.4-test9-pre7 and DRI again.

2000-10-01 Thread amijuli
On Sun, 01 Oct 2000 12:09:19 J . Lehtonen wrote: > > On Sun, 01 Oct 2000 05:41:39 Sean wrote: > > I'm running the phase2v12 debs and a 2.4.0-test7 kernel with a G400Max. > > > > In order to run DRI I grabbed the latest CVS from dri.sourceforge.net, > > did a compile, and grabbed the mga.o file t

Re: A small question

2000-10-01 Thread Branden Robinson
On Sat, Sep 30, 2000 at 10:47:52PM -0400, Daniel Jacobowitz wrote: > At least in XF3, this was not possible. It might have changed in XF4, > but I severely doubt it. It's a limitation of the X protocol; the root > window can not be resized. Actually, Jim Getts (yes, *the* Jim Gettys who is one o

Re: phase2v12, 2.4-test9-pre7 and DRI again.

2000-10-01 Thread amijuli
On Sun, 01 Oct 2000 12:09:19 J . Lehtonen wrote: > > On Sun, 01 Oct 2000 05:41:39 Sean wrote: > > I'm running the phase2v12 debs and a 2.4.0-test7 kernel with a G400Max. > > > > In order to run DRI I grabbed the latest CVS from dri.sourceforge.net, > > did a compile, and grabbed the mga.o file

Re: A small question

2000-10-01 Thread Branden Robinson
On Sat, Sep 30, 2000 at 10:47:52PM -0400, Daniel Jacobowitz wrote: > At least in XF3, this was not possible. It might have changed in XF4, > but I severely doubt it. It's a limitation of the X protocol; the root > window can not be resized. Actually, Jim Getts (yes, *the* Jim Gettys who is one

Re: [debian-x] A small question

2000-10-01 Thread Gordon Heydon
Thanks - I didn't relise that it did that now in my smaller resolutions did the pan and scan thing Oh well I will have to play with the fonts and stuff so I can use it quite easily. Thanks again Gordon. * Seth Arnold ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote: > Gorden, I have a suggestion; while I have 1600x1200