Re: [stilli@student.dm.unipi.it: XFree 4.0.1 debian packages]

2000-10-25 Thread Gabriele Stilli
On Tue, 24 Oct 2000, Charl P. Botha wrote: Dear Gabriele, Please DO NOT send mail to Branden! This is mentioned in various places. I'm sorry. I don't read the lists and I didn't know of this. The DEBs in the woody directory do not like being installed on a potato system very much. With

Re: [stilli@student.dm.unipi.it: XFree 4.0.1 debian packages]

2000-10-25 Thread Gabriele Stilli
On 24 Oct 2000, Kenneth MacDonald wrote: I've put them up in http://www.edlug.ed.ac.uk/Mirrors/Debian/dists/potato/cpbotha for anyone to grab. They're not apt'able yet. I ran out of time to do that. I'll let this list know when they are if there's demand. If I'm allowed to, I'd like to

Re: [branden@deadbeast.net: [bequw@stanford.edu: future of xlibs question]]

2000-10-25 Thread Seth Arnold
* Branden Robinson [EMAIL PROTECTED] [001025 00:06]: And phase 3? NOW who's not reading the documentation? Tut, tut. Heh, you are making changes faster than I can download and test them! :) BTW -- nice work with it all. :) -- ``Oh Lord; Ooh you are so big; So absolutely huge; Gosh we're

XKB keymap

2000-10-25 Thread David Buch
hi I deleted /usr/X11R6/lib/X11/xkb/ Today I upgraded to phase2v22, but there are also missing things in /usr/X11R6/lib/X11/xkb/ What can I do? up to sometime.. David -- Diese email ist ausschließlich mit freier Software erstellt worden (Debian (Woody), Linux, mutt/vi ... ) ! ! !

Re: [branden@deadbeast.net: [bequw@stanford.edu: future of xlibs question]]

2000-10-25 Thread Scott Bronson
Brian, please do not bother Branden directly, he gets too much of that already. BTW, what happened to "I obey."? Why would anyone read that message? It's a full page of all-caps shouting. It looks just like a EULA, and who reads those? Something like this would probably work better...

OT: [branden@deadbeast.net: [bequw@stanford.edu: future of xlibs question]]

2000-10-25 Thread Benedikt Spranger
On Tue, 24 Oct 2000, Branden Robinson wrote: ... [Branden, perhaps you should change it to require, "I promise I will not email Branden, so help me God". :] Please do not! We have the debian-XF4 installed at nearly 10 computers in our student home. Every thing works fine, so we have to give

HasGlide needs to be disabled for the Hurd

2000-10-25 Thread Marcus Brinkmann
Hi, here is another one I missed: 100_debian_host.def.diff defines HasGlide etc to yes, but the Hurd doesn't have glide, and it's not trivial to port (had a look at glide2 today). So please protect the setting of HasGlide2, Glide2IncDir, HasGlide3, Glide3IncDir with "#if

4.? mach64 server ?

2000-10-25 Thread Johannes Zellner
Hello, on http://samosa.debian.org/~branden/woody/i386/ I found varous 4.01 packages but not a mach64 XServer. Does that just mean that this xserver wasn't debianized yet ? -- Johannes -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact

Some more Hurd files (*.files.hurd-i386)

2000-10-25 Thread Marcus Brinkmann
Hi, I forgot those *.{docs,files}.hurd-i386 in my last mail. They are attached now. The osmesa stuff is dummy only, and it would be better not to package those at all for the Hurd. Thanks, Marcus -- `Rhubarb is no Egyptian god.' Debian http://www.debian.org [EMAIL PROTECTED] Marcus Brinkmann

Re: HasGlide needs to be disabled for the Hurd

2000-10-25 Thread Zephaniah E. Hull
On Wed, Oct 25, 2000 at 09:29:53PM +0200, Marcus Brinkmann wrote: Hi, snip So please protect the setting of HasGlide2, Glide2IncDir, HasGlide3, Glide3IncDir with "#if !GNUMachArchitecture"/"#endif". I don't think you want a patch for this, but if, let me know and it will come subito. Could

Mouse stopped working - xlibs 4.0.1-0phase2v22 or wmaker 0.62.1-0.1 ?

2000-10-25 Thread Simon deWeerdt
Package: xlibs version: 4.0.1-0phase2v22 first observed when I upgraded to phase2v21 from phase2v17 may or may not be xlibs - could also be - a hidden interupt problem ( not likely but possible ) - apmd 3.0final-1 ( also recently updated ) - toshutils 1.9.9-6 ( just installed ) - gpm

[branden@deadbeast.net: [bequw@stanford.edu: future of xlibs question]]

2000-10-25 Thread Seth Arnold
Brian, please do not bother Branden directly, he gets too much of that already. BTW, what happened to I obey.? [Branden, perhaps you should change it to require, I promise I will not email Branden, so help me God. :] To answer your direct question, GLU will be supported once upstream supports it.

Re: [branden@deadbeast.net: [bequw@stanford.edu: future of xlibs question]]

2000-10-25 Thread Seth Arnold
* Branden Robinson [EMAIL PROTECTED] [001024 21:47]: We're getting close to 4.0.1-1. That message had to come out sometime. And phase 3? -- ``Oh Lord; Ooh you are so big; So absolutely huge; Gosh we're all really impressed down here, I can tell you.''

Re: [stilli@student.dm.unipi.it: XFree 4.0.1 debian packages]

2000-10-25 Thread Gabriele Stilli
On Tue, 24 Oct 2000, Charl P. Botha wrote: Dear Gabriele, Please DO NOT send mail to Branden! This is mentioned in various places. I'm sorry. I don't read the lists and I didn't know of this. The DEBs in the woody directory do not like being installed on a potato system very much. With

Re: [stilli@student.dm.unipi.it: XFree 4.0.1 debian packages]

2000-10-25 Thread Gabriele Stilli
On 24 Oct 2000, Kenneth MacDonald wrote: I've put them up in http://www.edlug.ed.ac.uk/Mirrors/Debian/dists/potato/cpbotha for anyone to grab. They're not apt'able yet. I ran out of time to do that. I'll let this list know when they are if there's demand. If I'm allowed to, I'd like to

Re: [branden@deadbeast.net: [bequw@stanford.edu: future of xlibs question]]

2000-10-25 Thread Branden Robinson
On Tue, Oct 24, 2000 at 10:07:21PM -0700, Seth Arnold wrote: * Branden Robinson [EMAIL PROTECTED] [001024 21:47]: We're getting close to 4.0.1-1. That message had to come out sometime. And phase 3? NOW who's not reading the documentation? Tut, tut. -- G. Branden Robinson |

Re: [branden@deadbeast.net: [bequw@stanford.edu: future of xlibs question]]

2000-10-25 Thread Seth Arnold
* Branden Robinson [EMAIL PROTECTED] [001025 00:06]: And phase 3? NOW who's not reading the documentation? Tut, tut. Heh, you are making changes faster than I can download and test them! :) BTW -- nice work with it all. :) -- ``Oh Lord; Ooh you are so big; So absolutely huge; Gosh we're

XKB keymap

2000-10-25 Thread David Buch
hi I deleted /usr/X11R6/lib/X11/xkb/ Today I upgraded to phase2v22, but there are also missing things in /usr/X11R6/lib/X11/xkb/ What can I do? up to sometime.. David -- Diese email ist ausschließlich mit freier Software erstellt worden (Debian (Woody), Linux, mutt/vi ... ) ! ! !

Re: [branden@deadbeast.net: [bequw@stanford.edu: future of xlibs question]]

2000-10-25 Thread Scott Bronson
Brian, please do not bother Branden directly, he gets too much of that already. BTW, what happened to I obey.? Why would anyone read that message? It's a full page of all-caps shouting. It looks just like a EULA, and who reads those? Something like this would probably work better...

Mouse stopped working - xlibs 4.0.1-0phase2v22 or wmaker 0.62.1-0.1 ?

2000-10-25 Thread Simon deWeerdt
Package: xlibs version: 4.0.1-0phase2v22 first observed when I upgraded to phase2v21 from phase2v17 may or may not be xlibs - could also be - a hidden interupt problem ( not likely but possible ) - apmd 3.0final-1 ( also recently updated ) - toshutils 1.9.9-6 ( just installed ) - gpm

HasGlide needs to be disabled for the Hurd

2000-10-25 Thread Marcus Brinkmann
Hi, here is another one I missed: 100_debian_host.def.diff defines HasGlide etc to yes, but the Hurd doesn't have glide, and it's not trivial to port (had a look at glide2 today). So please protect the setting of HasGlide2, Glide2IncDir, HasGlide3, Glide3IncDir with #if

OT: [branden@deadbeast.net: [bequw@stanford.edu: future of xlibs question]]

2000-10-25 Thread Benedikt Spranger
On Tue, 24 Oct 2000, Branden Robinson wrote: ... [Branden, perhaps you should change it to require, I promise I will not email Branden, so help me God. :] Please do not! We have the debian-XF4 installed at nearly 10 computers in our student home. Every thing works fine, so we have to give

4.? mach64 server ?

2000-10-25 Thread Johannes Zellner
Hello, on http://samosa.debian.org/~branden/woody/i386/ I found varous 4.01 packages but not a mach64 XServer. Does that just mean that this xserver wasn't debianized yet ? -- Johannes

Re: 4.? mach64 server ?

2000-10-25 Thread Frank Belew
On Wed, Oct 25, 2000 at 09:58:29PM +0200, Johannes Zellner wrote: Hello, on http://samosa.debian.org/~branden/woody/i386/ I found varous 4.01 packages but not a mach64 XServer. Does that just mean that this xserver wasn't debianized yet ? XF4 now uses a unified server with various

third set of Hurd fixes, and libOSMesa problem

2000-10-25 Thread Marcus Brinkmann
Hi, these are the remaining items I sorted out today. I am actually up to dh_movefiles now, so building the packages will be easy (dh_movefiles is so slow...). The three patches attached (113 - 115) fix a couple of issues the resulting MANIFEST file revealed. The MANIFEST file after applying

Some more Hurd files (*.files.hurd-i386)

2000-10-25 Thread Marcus Brinkmann
Hi, I forgot those *.{docs,files}.hurd-i386 in my last mail. They are attached now. The osmesa stuff is dummy only, and it would be better not to package those at all for the Hurd. Thanks, Marcus -- `Rhubarb is no Egyptian god.' Debian http://www.debian.org [EMAIL PROTECTED] Marcus Brinkmann

Re: HasGlide needs to be disabled for the Hurd

2000-10-25 Thread Zephaniah E. Hull
On Wed, Oct 25, 2000 at 09:29:53PM +0200, Marcus Brinkmann wrote: Hi, snip So please protect the setting of HasGlide2, Glide2IncDir, HasGlide3, Glide3IncDir with #if !GNUMachArchitecture/#endif. I don't think you want a patch for this, but if, let me know and it will come subito. Could you