CS Hi,
CS since I did not find an /etc/X11/XF86Config-4 file after upgrading to X
CS Windows (4.0.2-7), I did
CS dpkg-reconfigure xserver-free86
CS answered all the questions, and expected that a new XF86Config-4 would be
CS produced. But still no, I could not find any file of that name
I found this problem too. What I found is that I had to run dexconf
after the configuration was done. Mind you, the config it generated was
broken with regards to the pointer section...
Cheers
Dave
On Fri, Apr 13, 2001 at 01:07:30PM +0400, Ilya Martynov wrote:
CS Hi,
CS since I did
Benjamin Redelings I wrote:
Hi, according to /proc/pci, I have a "ATI Technologies Inc 3D Rage Pro
AGP 1X/2X".
I compiled agp and the r128 DRI driver for kernel 2.4.3-ac5.
Your chip isn't a Rage128. There is only rudimentary support for the mach64
family in a branch of the DRI CVS yet.
Hallo Charl,
* Charl schrieb:
On Wed, Apr 11, 2001 at 07:02:30PM -0500, Branden Robinson wrote:
On Wed, Apr 11, 2001 at 04:22:38PM +0200, Waldemar Brodkorb wrote:
Why libXv.so is not integrated in the new pre-debs from
Branden Robinson's site?
Because the upstream build process
Dear Mark,
There has been some discussion recently on the Debian list devoted to
maintaining X (see CC) about the lack of a shared version of the Xv
library. There would appear to be an opinion that shared versions of
the libraries should be included.
Any chance you could drop a note to the
On Fri, Apr 13, 2001 at 07:11:49PM +0200, Waldemar Brodkorb wrote:
* Branden wrote:
On Wed, Apr 11, 2001 at 04:22:38PM +0200, Waldemar Brodkorb wrote:
Why libXv.so is not integrated in the new pre-debs from
Branden Robinson's site?
Because the upstream build process does not
On Fri, Apr 13, 2001 at 01:57:52PM +0100, Dave Swegen wrote:
I found this problem too. What I found is that I had to run dexconf
after the configuration was done. Mind you, the config it generated was
broken with regards to the pointer section...
Cheers
Dave
On Fri, Apr 13, 2001
I've checked and rebuilt Branden's test release
xfree86_4.0.3-0pre1v2.deb. And I found a minor problem.
XFree86 4.0.3 includes FreeType2 library and it will be built
When defined `HasFreetype2 NO'. The default setting is
`HasFreetype2 NO' and test release package does not change the
setting.
On Sat, Apr 14, 2001 at 03:21:01AM +0900, ISHIKAWA Mutsumi wrote:
I've checked and rebuilt Branden's test release
xfree86_4.0.3-0pre1v2.deb. And I found a minor problem.
XFree86 4.0.3 includes FreeType2 library and it will be built
When defined `HasFreetype2 NO'. The default setting is
On 13 Apr 2001, Juliusz Chroboczek wrote:
Dear Mark,
There has been some discussion recently on the Debian list devoted to
maintaining X (see CC) about the lack of a shared version of the Xv
library. There would appear to be an opinion that shared versions of
the libraries should be
On Fri, Apr 13, 2001 at 10:53:54AM -0700, Mark Vojkovich wrote:
It's not an X-consortium standard, or even a de-facto standard.
If you have an app that links against Xv, it won't even start
unless you have the libraries on your machine. That would prohibit
using that app with anything
CS Hi,
CS since I did not find an /etc/X11/XF86Config-4 file after upgrading to X
CS Windows (4.0.2-7), I did
CS dpkg-reconfigure xserver-free86
CS answered all the questions, and expected that a new XF86Config-4 would be
CS produced. But still no, I could not find any file of that name on
I found this problem too. What I found is that I had to run dexconf
after the configuration was done. Mind you, the config it generated was
broken with regards to the pointer section...
Cheers
Dave
On Fri, Apr 13, 2001 at 01:07:30PM +0400, Ilya Martynov wrote:
CS Hi,
CS since I did
Benjamin Redelings I wrote:
Hi, according to /proc/pci, I have a ATI Technologies Inc 3D Rage Pro
AGP 1X/2X.
I compiled agp and the r128 DRI driver for kernel 2.4.3-ac5.
Your chip isn't a Rage128. There is only rudimentary support for the mach64
family in a branch of the DRI CVS yet.
--
Hello Branden,
* Branden wrote:
On Wed, Apr 11, 2001 at 04:22:38PM +0200, Waldemar Brodkorb wrote:
Why libXv.so is not integrated in the new pre-debs from
Branden Robinson's site?
Because the upstream build process does not compile a shared version. Xv
is at present available only as a
Hallo Charl,
* Charl schrieb:
On Wed, Apr 11, 2001 at 07:02:30PM -0500, Branden Robinson wrote:
On Wed, Apr 11, 2001 at 04:22:38PM +0200, Waldemar Brodkorb wrote:
Why libXv.so is not integrated in the new pre-debs from
Branden Robinson's site?
Because the upstream build process
Dear Mark,
There has been some discussion recently on the Debian list devoted to
maintaining X (see CC) about the lack of a shared version of the Xv
library. There would appear to be an opinion that shared versions of
the libraries should be included.
Any chance you could drop a note to the
On Fri, Apr 13, 2001 at 07:11:49PM +0200, Waldemar Brodkorb wrote:
* Branden wrote:
On Wed, Apr 11, 2001 at 04:22:38PM +0200, Waldemar Brodkorb wrote:
Why libXv.so is not integrated in the new pre-debs from
Branden Robinson's site?
Because the upstream build process does not
On Fri, Apr 13, 2001 at 01:57:52PM +0100, Dave Swegen wrote:
I found this problem too. What I found is that I had to run dexconf
after the configuration was done. Mind you, the config it generated was
broken with regards to the pointer section...
Cheers
Dave
On Fri, Apr 13, 2001 at
I've checked and rebuilt Branden's test release
xfree86_4.0.3-0pre1v2.deb. And I found a minor problem.
XFree86 4.0.3 includes FreeType2 library and it will be built
When defined `HasFreetype2 NO'. The default setting is
`HasFreetype2 NO' and test release package does not change the
setting.
On Sat, Apr 14, 2001 at 03:21:01AM +0900, ISHIKAWA Mutsumi wrote:
I've checked and rebuilt Branden's test release
xfree86_4.0.3-0pre1v2.deb. And I found a minor problem.
XFree86 4.0.3 includes FreeType2 library and it will be built
When defined `HasFreetype2 NO'. The default setting is
On 13 Apr 2001, Juliusz Chroboczek wrote:
Dear Mark,
There has been some discussion recently on the Debian list devoted to
maintaining X (see CC) about the lack of a shared version of the Xv
library. There would appear to be an opinion that shared versions of
the libraries should be
On Fri, Apr 13, 2001 at 10:53:54AM -0700, Mark Vojkovich wrote:
It's not an X-consortium standard, or even a de-facto standard.
If you have an app that links against Xv, it won't even start
unless you have the libraries on your machine. That would prohibit
using that app with anything other
23 matches
Mail list logo
