From: Jules Bean <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
> On Thu, Oct 25, 2001 at 03:30:56AM +0900, Junichi Uekawa wrote:
> > Thus, doing
> >
> > # apt-get install apt dpkg
> > # apt-get dist-upgrade
> >
> > before doing the upgrade would be successful, but just doing
>
> As I recall, that has been a recommenda
From: Jules Bean <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
> On Thu, Oct 25, 2001 at 03:30:56AM +0900, Junichi Uekawa wrote:
> > Thus, doing
> >
> > # apt-get install apt dpkg
> > # apt-get dist-upgrade
> >
> > before doing the upgrade would be successful, but just doing
>
> As I recall, that has been a recommend
On Thu, Oct 25, 2001 at 03:30:56AM +0900, Junichi Uekawa wrote:
> Actually, I've noticed in the way that the apt in woody successfully upgrades
> the
> system without removing X. However, doing the upgrade using apt in
> potato would fail.
>
> Thus, doing
>
> # apt-get install apt dpkg
> # apt-
On Thu, Oct 25, 2001 at 03:30:56AM +0900, Junichi Uekawa wrote:
> Thus, doing
>
> # apt-get install apt dpkg
> # apt-get dist-upgrade
>
> before doing the upgrade would be successful, but just doing
As I recall, that has been a recommendation in previous versions. (The
dpkg update, at least).
On Thu, Oct 25, 2001 at 03:30:56AM +0900, Junichi Uekawa wrote:
> Actually, I've noticed in the way that the apt in woody successfully upgrades the
> system without removing X. However, doing the upgrade using apt in
> potato would fail.
>
> Thus, doing
>
> # apt-get install apt dpkg
> # apt-ge
On Thu, Oct 25, 2001 at 03:30:56AM +0900, Junichi Uekawa wrote:
> Thus, doing
>
> # apt-get install apt dpkg
> # apt-get dist-upgrade
>
> before doing the upgrade would be successful, but just doing
>
> # apt-get dist-upgrade
>
> will be quite unsuccessful :P (something to add to the release
Branden Robinson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> immo vero scripsit
> apt-get -u -o Debug::pkgProblemResolver=true dist-upgrade
>
> And post your results here?
>
> We need to know if this is a bug in apt, or there is some extra degree
> of finagling that needs to be done with the XFree86 package
> relations
On Tue, Oct 23, 2001 at 07:48:49PM -0500, Branden Robinson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
was heard to say:
> On Tue, Oct 23, 2001 at 04:41:54PM -0700, Tal Danzig wrote:
> > Anyway, I just though of something else. You could put xinit, xauth,
> > and startx in both packages, then have them conflict with eac
On Thu, Oct 25, 2001 at 03:30:56AM +0900, Junichi Uekawa wrote:
> Thus, doing
>
> # apt-get install apt dpkg
> # apt-get dist-upgrade
>
> before doing the upgrade would be successful, but just doing
As I recall, that has been a recommendation in previous versions. (The
dpkg update, at least).
Please allow us to introduce ourselves,
Igoework.com is represented by a group that includes:
- Talented engineers(Mechanical and Electrical)
- Software solutions(CAD, FEA)
- Manufacturing vendors (Castings, Sheet Metal, Plastics, SLA, etc)
- Technical placement (Direct placement of tal
On Thu, Oct 25, 2001 at 03:30:56AM +0900, Junichi Uekawa wrote:
> Thus, doing
>
> # apt-get install apt dpkg
> # apt-get dist-upgrade
>
> before doing the upgrade would be successful, but just doing
>
> # apt-get dist-upgrade
>
> will be quite unsuccessful :P (something to add to the release
Branden Robinson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> immo vero scripsit
> apt-get -u -o Debug::pkgProblemResolver=true dist-upgrade
>
> And post your results here?
>
> We need to know if this is a bug in apt, or there is some extra degree
> of finagling that needs to be done with the XFree86 package
> relation
On Tue, Oct 23, 2001 at 07:02:22PM -0700, Tal Danzig wrote:
> * On Tue Oct 23, 2001 19:48:49 -0500, Branden Robinson wrote:
> > Congratulations, you guys are totally killing my motivation for
> > implementing this proposal in any way.
>
> Well, I tried to help and provide some constructive input,
On Tue, Oct 23, 2001 at 05:03:02AM -0500, Branden Robinson wrote:
> 1) libGLU is now built for hppa
> 2) Ben Collins fixed imake to report the correct libc version on hppa
.debs for hppa are now available at the X Strike Force. Please test!
--
G. Branden Robinson|I must desp
On Tue, Oct 23, 2001 at 07:48:49PM -0500, Branden Robinson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> was
heard to say:
> On Tue, Oct 23, 2001 at 04:41:54PM -0700, Tal Danzig wrote:
> > Anyway, I just though of something else. You could put xinit, xauth,
> > and startx in both packages, then have them conflict with ea
Please allow us to introduce ourselves,
Igoework.com is represented by a group that includes:
- Talented engineers(Mechanical and Electrical)
- Software solutions(CAD, FEA)
- Manufacturing vendors (Castings, Sheet Metal, Plastics, SLA, etc)
- Technical placement (Direct placement of ta
Branden Robinson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Feedback to debian-x, please.
I just tested the i386-packages (Matrox G200), upgrading from -7 was
smooth and I didn't find any problems.
thanks for your work, cu andreas
On Tue, Oct 23, 2001 at 07:02:22PM -0700, Tal Danzig wrote:
> * On Tue Oct 23, 2001 19:48:49 -0500, Branden Robinson wrote:
> > Congratulations, you guys are totally killing my motivation for
> > implementing this proposal in any way.
>
> Well, I tried to help and provide some constructive input,
On Wed, Oct 24, 2001 at 03:18:05PM +0900, Junichi Uekawa wrote:
> I don't think people will get xbase-clients in the current situation.
>
> In my experience of upgrading several systems, upgrading from potato shall
> see
> most of X-related packages being removed, notably, "startx" goes missing.
On Tue, Oct 23, 2001 at 05:03:02AM -0500, Branden Robinson wrote:
> 1) libGLU is now built for hppa
> 2) Ben Collins fixed imake to report the correct libc version on hppa
.debs for hppa are now available at the X Strike Force. Please test!
--
G. Branden Robinson|I must des
Branden Robinson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Feedback to debian-x, please.
I just tested the i386-packages (Matrox G200), upgrading from -7 was
smooth and I didn't find any problems.
thanks for your work, cu andreas
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe
On Wed, Oct 24, 2001 at 03:18:05PM +0900, Junichi Uekawa wrote:
> I don't think people will get xbase-clients in the current situation.
>
> In my experience of upgrading several systems, upgrading from potato shall see
> most of X-related packages being removed, notably, "startx" goes missing.
>
Daniel Burrows <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> immo vero scripsit
> What about upgrades? Initial installs probably aren't a problem, but
> people upgrading without metapackages will get xbase-clients and not xinit!
> (thus preventing them from starting X at all, at least using the common
> methods)
I don
23 matches
Mail list logo
