Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
severity 165134 wishlist
Bug#165134: xlibs: [xkb] symbol change in us keyboard disables Meta and Compose
key
Severity set to `wishlist'.
retitle 165134 xlibs: [xkb] please break compatibility with upstream in pc104
symbols file
Bug#165134: xlibs:
On Thu, Oct 17, 2002 at 11:49:31PM +0200, David Spreen wrote:
What about including a README about that in the package until things
become more clear. I would write one explaining the normal solution for
US-users (using the altwin:meta_win Option) and the changes I made
to make it working for
On Fri, Oct 18, 2002 at 12:29:33AM +0200, Erwin Burgstaller wrote:
Ok, I see. I've tracked down the problem more carefully now:
The SOSYMLINK problem maybe solved by including Library.tmpl in
Imake.rules:
--- Imake.rules.~1~ 2002-10-08 08:06:23.0 +0200
+++ Imake.rules 2002-10-17
severity 165134 wishlist
retitle 165134 xlibs: [xkb] please break compatibility with upstream in pc104
symbols file
tag 165134 + wontfix
thanks
So in Debian 3.0 Windows keys work as Meta keys. Debian 3.x Windows do
not. Yup, no breakage there.
People also complained that it was broken when
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
close 14191
Bug#14191: xbase-clients: [xkbwatch] no manpage
Bug#31396: xbase-clients: [xkbbell,xkbvleds,xkbwatch] no manpages
Bug closed, send any further explanations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
reopen 14191 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#14191: xbase-clients:
El Miércoles, 16 octubre, 2002, a las 01:26 AM, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
escribió:
On Tue, Oct 15, 2002 at 11:30:50PM +0200, José Salavert Torres wrote:
El Jueves, 3 octubre, 2002, a las 07:24 PM, Branden Robinson escribió:
On Thu, Oct 03, 2002 at 02:53:47PM +0200, José Salavert Torres wrote:
Your message dated Fri, 18 Oct 2002 14:30:55 -0500
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Alt modifier and Meta keysym now the same on
pc101/pc102/pc104/pc105 XKB models
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt
Your message dated Fri, 18 Oct 2002 14:30:55 -0500
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Alt modifier and Meta keysym now the same on
pc101/pc102/pc104/pc105 XKB models
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt
Your message dated Fri, 18 Oct 2002 14:30:55 -0500
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Alt modifier and Meta keysym now the same on
pc101/pc102/pc104/pc105 XKB models
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt
Your message dated Fri, 18 Oct 2002 14:30:55 -0500
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Alt modifier and Meta keysym now the same on
pc101/pc102/pc104/pc105 XKB models
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt
On Fri, Oct 18, 2002 at 02:01:54PM +0200, José Salavert Torres wrote:
What do you mean, nothing? Using the fb device driver renders
debconf utterly non-functional on your system?
You are asked no questions at all?
Yes, the problem was that I erased dboostrap_settings from root
Package: xfree86
Version: unavailable; reported 2002-10-18
Severity: normal
Using a standard 104-key keyboard with the windows key, I have many
keymappings using alt and windows combinations. Upon upgrading, my alt
key turned into meta and the windows key no longer worked properly.
After reading
I dunno if this is the best list for this but (/me wonders how many
times that's been said)
After upgrading my kernel to 2.4.19, my mouse pointer hasn't lined up to
where I actually click. About 2cm to the left. I didn't notice this
straight off as I have been doing a lot of stuff in xterm's
On Sam, 2002-10-19 at 00:47, Dan Walrond wrote:
I dunno if this is the best list for this but (/me wonders how many
times that's been said)
Not too bad a choice, Xpert probably would have been better though,
there have been similar reports before there.
After upgrading my kernel to
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
close 14191
Bug#14191: xbase-clients: [xkbwatch] no manpage
Bug#31396: xbase-clients: [xkbbell,xkbvleds,xkbwatch] no manpages
Bug closed, send any further explanations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
reopen 14191 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#14191: xbase-clients:
El Miércoles, 16 octubre, 2002, a las 01:26 AM, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
escribió:
On Tue, Oct 15, 2002 at 11:30:50PM +0200, José Salavert Torres wrote:
El Jueves, 3 octubre, 2002, a las 07:24 PM, Branden Robinson escribió:
On Thu, Oct 03, 2002 at 02:53:47PM +0200, José Salavert Torres wrote:
You
Your message dated Fri, 18 Oct 2002 14:30:55 -0500
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Alt modifier and Meta keysym now the same on pc101/pc102/pc104/pc105
XKB models
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt
Your message dated Fri, 18 Oct 2002 14:30:55 -0500
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Alt modifier and Meta keysym now the same on pc101/pc102/pc104/pc105
XKB models
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt
On Fri, Oct 18, 2002 at 02:01:54PM +0200, José Salavert Torres wrote:
What do you mean, nothing? Using the fb device driver renders
debconf utterly non-functional on your system?
You are asked no questions at all?
Yes, the problem was that I erased dboostrap_settings from root
Package: xfree86
Version: unavailable; reported 2002-10-18
Severity: normal
Using a standard 104-key keyboard with the windows key, I have many
keymappings using alt and windows combinations. Upon upgrading, my alt
key turned into meta and the windows key no longer worked properly.
After reading
I dunno if this is the best list for this but (/me wonders how many
times that's been said)
After upgrading my kernel to 2.4.19, my mouse pointer hasn't lined up to
where I actually click. About 2cm to the left. I didn't notice this
straight off as I have been doing a lot of stuff in xterm's
On Sam, 2002-10-19 at 00:47, Dan Walrond wrote:
I dunno if this is the best list for this but (/me wonders how many
times that's been said)
Not too bad a choice, Xpert probably would have been better though,
there have been similar reports before there.
After upgrading my kernel to
22 matches
Mail list logo
