Package: xfree86
Version: 4.2.1-4
Severity: serious
Tags: help
making all in lib/GL/glx...
make[6]: Entering directory
`/build/buildd/xfree86-4.2.1/build-tree/xc-xserver-xfree86-dbg/lib/GL/glx'
rm -f clientattrib.o unshared/clientattrib.o
gcc -c -ansi -pedantic -Wall -Wpointer-arith
Package: xfree86
Version: 4.2.1-4
Severity: serious
gcc -c -g -O2 -ansi -pedantic -Wall -Wpointer-arith -Wstrict-prototypes
-Wmissing-prototypes -Wmissing-declarations -Wredundant-decls -Wnested-externs -Wundef
-I. -I../../../../../programs/Xserver/hw/xfree86/os-support
Package: xfree86
Version: unavailable; reported 2002-11-24
Severity: serious
Tags: help
gcc -c -g -O2 -ansi -pedantic -Wall -Wpointer-arith -Wstrict-prototypes
-Wmissing-prototypes -Wmissing-declarations -Wredundant-decls -Wnested-externs -Wundef
-I. -I../include
Package: xfree86
Version: 4.2.1-4
Severity: serious
Tags: help
gcc -c -g -O2 -fsigned-char-I../include -I../../../exports/include/X11
-I../../../include/extensions -I../../../programs/Xserver/Xext
-I../../../programs/Xserver/mi -I../../.. -I../../../exports/include
This same failure hits ia64.
--
G. Branden Robinson| It just seems to me that you are
Debian GNU/Linux | willfully entering an arse-kicking
[EMAIL PROTECTED] | contest with a monstrous entity
http://people.debian.org/~branden/ |
Package: xserver-xfree86
Version: 4.2.1-4
Severity: normal
Tags: sid upstream
I get the following error when trying to use applications that render with X-Video:
X Error: BadAlloc (insufficient resources for operation) 11
Major opcode: 141
This used to work just fine with XFree86 4.1. Here's
Same XKB problems on these architectures.
--
G. Branden Robinson| Software engineering: that part of
Debian GNU/Linux | computer science which is too
[EMAIL PROTECTED] | difficult for the computer
http://people.debian.org/~branden/ |
Package: xfs
Version: 4.2.1-4
Severity: minor
Tags: sid
`man 5 xfs.options' points to a /etc/X11/xfs/xfs.options file. That file
^
does not exist. /etc/X11/fs/xfs.options does.
Either the man page should be changed or the directory xfs gets its conf
files
This is it:
### BEGIN DEBCONF SECTION
# XF86Config-4 (XFree86 server configuration file) generated by dexconf, the
# Debian X Configuration tool, using values from the debconf database.
#
# Edit this file with caution, and see the XF86Config-4 manual page.
# (Type man XF86Config-4 at the shell
In [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Branden Robinson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Package: xfree86
Version: unavailable; reported 2002-11-24
Severity: serious
Tags: help
gcc -c -g -O2 -ansi -pedantic -Wall -Wpointer-arith -Wstrict-prototypes
-Wmissing-prototypes -Wmissing-declarations -Wredundant-decls
Your message dated Mon, 25 Nov 2002 00:31:04 +0900
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Bug#165899: xlibs-dbg: no unstripped libs for
/usr/X11R6/lib/X11/locale/common/*
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been
On Sun, Nov 24, 2002 at 09:12:40PM +0900, ISHIKAWA Mutsumi wrote:
SHMLBA is defined in /usr/include/bits/shm.h as:
/* Segment low boundary address multiple. */
#define SHMLBA (__getpagesize ())
extern int __getpagesize (void) __THROW __attribute__ ((__const__));
But on hppa
Package: xfree86
Version: unavailable; reported 2002-11-24
Severity: wishlist
Hi Branden,
looking into 4.2.1-4 let me find a bug in debconf-gettextize: duplicated
strings were removed due to a stupid bug, which unfortunately affect
many strings in xfree86.
I just uploaded po-debconf 0.5.3 with a
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
reassign 170507 glibc
Bug#170507: xfree86: FTBFS on hppa: 'SHMBLA' undeclared
Bug reassigned from package `xfree86' to `glibc'.
retitle 170507 glibc: header goofup on hppa breaks XFree86 compilation
Bug#170507: xfree86: FTBFS on hppa: 'SHMBLA'
reassign 170507 glibc
retitle 170507 glibc: header goofup on hppa breaks XFree86 compilation
thanks
On Sun, Nov 24, 2002 at 04:24:23PM +, Matthew Wilcox wrote:
On Sun, Nov 24, 2002 at 09:12:40PM +0900, ISHIKAWA Mutsumi wrote:
SHMLBA is defined in /usr/include/bits/shm.h as:
/*
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
retitle 170508 xserver-xfree86: FTBFS on alpha,ia64: damned old GLX library assumes
X11 headers installed on system
Bug#170508: xfree86: FTBFS on alpha: damned old GLX library assumes X11 headers
installed to system
Changed Bug title.
End of
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
retitle 170508 xfree86: FTBFS on alpha,ia64: damned old GLX library assumes X11
headers installed on system
Bug#170508: xserver-xfree86: FTBFS on alpha,ia64: damned old GLX library assumes X11
headers installed on system
Changed Bug title.
End of
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
retitle 170510 xfree86: FTBFS on arm,mips,mipsel: xc/programs/Xserver/xkb/xkberrs.c
assumes X11/Xlib.h and X11/XKBlib.h available
Bug#170510: xfree86: FTBFS on arm: xc/programs/Xserver/xkb/xkberrs.c assumes
X11/Xlib.h and X11/XKBlib.h available
reassign 165601 xserver-xfree86
retitle 165601 xserver-xfree86: X server won't start; 'unable to load required base
modules'
tag 165601 + moreinfo
thanks
M. Bitaud,
I am unable to do much with your bug report because I do not have
sufficient information to proceed.
Please mail this bug with
Your message dated Mon, 25 Nov 2002 00:00:52 -0500
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line closing this report
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility
Your message dated Mon, 25 Nov 2002 00:02:17 -0500
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line closing old bug
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
reassign 165061 xserver-xfree86
Bug#165061: x windowx don't start
Bug reassigned from package `xfree86' to `xserver-xfree86'.
retitle 165601 xserver-xfree86: X server won't start; 'unable to load required base
modules'
Bug#165601: xserver-xfree86: X
Your message dated Mon, 25 Nov 2002 00:03:16 -0500
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Bug#164026: NetBSD build patches
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
retitle 165061 xserver-xfree86: X server won't start; 'unable to load required base
modules'
Bug#165061: x windowx don't start
Changed Bug title.
retitle 165601 kernel-patch-freeswan-ext: kernel build permissions error
Bug#165601:
Package: xfree86
Version: 4.2.1-4
Severity: serious
Tags: help
making all in lib/GL/glx...
make[6]: Entering directory
`/build/buildd/xfree86-4.2.1/build-tree/xc-xserver-xfree86-dbg/lib/GL/glx'
rm -f clientattrib.o unshared/clientattrib.o
gcc -c -ansi -pedantic -Wall -Wpointer-arith
Package: xfree86
Version: 4.2.1-4
Severity: serious
gcc -c -g -O2 -ansi -pedantic -Wall -Wpointer-arith -Wstrict-prototypes
-Wmissing-prototypes -Wmissing-declarations -Wredundant-decls -Wnested-externs
-Wundef-I. -I../../../../../programs/Xserver/hw/xfree86/os-support
Package: xfree86
Version: unavailable; reported 2002-11-24
Severity: serious
Tags: help
gcc -c -g -O2 -ansi -pedantic -Wall -Wpointer-arith -Wstrict-prototypes
-Wmissing-prototypes -Wmissing-declarations -Wredundant-decls -Wnested-externs
-Wundef-I. -I../include
Package: xfree86
Version: 4.2.1-4
Severity: serious
Tags: help
gcc -c -g -O2 -fsigned-char-I../include -I../../../exports/include/X11
-I../../../include/extensions -I../../../programs/Xserver/Xext
-I../../../programs/Xserver/mi -I../../.. -I../../../exports/include
This same failure hits ia64.
--
G. Branden Robinson| It just seems to me that you are
Debian GNU/Linux | willfully entering an arse-kicking
[EMAIL PROTECTED] | contest with a monstrous entity
http://people.debian.org/~branden/ |
Package: xserver-xfree86
Version: 4.2.1-4
Severity: normal
Tags: sid upstream
I get the following error when trying to use applications that render with
X-Video:
X Error: BadAlloc (insufficient resources for operation) 11
Major opcode: 141
This used to work just fine with XFree86 4.1.
Same XKB problems on these architectures.
--
G. Branden Robinson| Software engineering: that part of
Debian GNU/Linux | computer science which is too
[EMAIL PROTECTED] | difficult for the computer
http://people.debian.org/~branden/ |
Package: xfs
Version: 4.2.1-4
Severity: minor
Tags: sid
`man 5 xfs.options' points to a /etc/X11/xfs/xfs.options file. That file
^
does not exist. /etc/X11/fs/xfs.options does.
Either the man page should be changed or the directory xfs gets its conf
files
This is it:
### BEGIN DEBCONF SECTION
# XF86Config-4 (XFree86 server configuration file) generated by dexconf, the
# Debian X Configuration tool, using values from the debconf database.
#
# Edit this file with caution, and see the XF86Config-4 manual page.
# (Type man XF86Config-4 at the shell
In [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Branden Robinson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Package: xfree86
Version: unavailable; reported 2002-11-24
Severity: serious
Tags: help
gcc -c -g -O2 -ansi -pedantic -Wall -Wpointer-arith -Wstrict-prototypes
-Wmissing-prototypes -Wmissing-declarations -Wredundant-decls
Your message dated Mon, 25 Nov 2002 00:31:04 +0900
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Bug#165899: xlibs-dbg: no unstripped libs for
/usr/X11R6/lib/X11/locale/common/*
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been
On Sun, Nov 24, 2002 at 09:12:40PM +0900, ISHIKAWA Mutsumi wrote:
SHMLBA is defined in /usr/include/bits/shm.h as:
/* Segment low boundary address multiple. */
#define SHMLBA (__getpagesize ())
extern int __getpagesize (void) __THROW __attribute__ ((__const__));
But on hppa
Package: xfree86
Version: unavailable; reported 2002-11-24
Severity: wishlist
Hi Branden,
looking into 4.2.1-4 let me find a bug in debconf-gettextize: duplicated
strings were removed due to a stupid bug, which unfortunately affect
many strings in xfree86.
I just uploaded po-debconf 0.5.3 with a
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
reassign 170507 glibc
Bug#170507: xfree86: FTBFS on hppa: 'SHMBLA' undeclared
Bug reassigned from package `xfree86' to `glibc'.
retitle 170507 glibc: header goofup on hppa breaks XFree86 compilation
Bug#170507: xfree86: FTBFS on hppa: 'SHMBLA'
reassign 170507 glibc
retitle 170507 glibc: header goofup on hppa breaks XFree86 compilation
thanks
On Sun, Nov 24, 2002 at 04:24:23PM +, Matthew Wilcox wrote:
On Sun, Nov 24, 2002 at 09:12:40PM +0900, ISHIKAWA Mutsumi wrote:
SHMLBA is defined in /usr/include/bits/shm.h as:
/*
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
retitle 170510 xfree86: FTBFS on arm,mips,mipsel:
xc/programs/Xserver/xkb/xkberrs.c assumes X11/Xlib.h and X11/XKBlib.h
available
Bug#170510: xfree86: FTBFS on arm: xc/programs/Xserver/xkb/xkberrs.c assumes
X11/Xlib.h and X11/XKBlib.h available
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
reassign 165601 xserver-xfree86
Bug#165601: kernel-patch-freeswan-ext: kernel build permissions error
Bug reassigned from package `kernel-patch-freeswan-ext' to `xserver-xfree86'.
retitle 165601 xserver-xfree86: X server won't start; 'unable to load
reassign 165601 xserver-xfree86
retitle 165601 xserver-xfree86: X server won't start; 'unable to load required
base modules'
tag 165601 + moreinfo
thanks
M. Bitaud,
I am unable to do much with your bug report because I do not have
sufficient information to proceed.
Please mail this bug with
Your message dated Mon, 25 Nov 2002 00:00:52 -0500
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line closing this report
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility
Your message dated Mon, 25 Nov 2002 00:02:17 -0500
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line closing old bug
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
reassign 165061 xserver-xfree86
Bug#165061: x windowx don't start
Bug reassigned from package `xfree86' to `xserver-xfree86'.
retitle 165601 xserver-xfree86: X server won't start; 'unable to load
required base modules'
Bug#165601: xserver-xfree86: X
Your message dated Mon, 25 Nov 2002 00:03:16 -0500
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Bug#164026: NetBSD build patches
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
retitle 165061 xserver-xfree86: X server won't start; 'unable to load
required base modules'
Bug#165061: x windowx don't start
Changed Bug title.
retitle 165601 kernel-patch-freeswan-ext: kernel build permissions error
Bug#165601:
47 matches
Mail list logo
