call china 6.2¢ www.callez.com

2002-12-31 Thread promotion

call china 6.2¢ www.callez.com

2002-12-31 Thread promotion

Re: Debian's XFree86 4.2 and SiS vs. DRI

2002-12-31 Thread Michel Dänzer
On Die, 2002-12-31 at 10:31, Thomas Winischhofer wrote: > Michel Dänzer wrote: > > Is SiS DRI even supposed to work in 4.2.x? I know that it most > > definitely won't work in 4.3.0 because it hasn't been maintained in a > > while. > > It is, I assume. Assumptions tend to be flawed. :) Have there

Happy new Year !!!! --X-PCs.de--

2002-12-31 Thread X-Pcs.de
Ein gutes und erfolgreiches Jahr wuenscht ihnen X-PCs.de !!! Fur alle Schnappchen-Jager : ## # X-PCs gibt ab 20.01.03 10% Rabatt auf alle Rechner # ## Fur alle Gewinner: #

Re: Debian's XFree86 4.2 and SiS vs. DRI

2002-12-31 Thread Michel Dänzer
On Die, 2002-12-31 at 10:31, Thomas Winischhofer wrote: > Michel Dänzer wrote: > > Is SiS DRI even supposed to work in 4.2.x? I know that it most > > definitely won't work in 4.3.0 because it hasn't been maintained in a > > while. > > It is, I assume. Assumptions tend to be flawed. :) Have there

Happy new Year !!!! --X-PCs.de--

2002-12-31 Thread X-Pcs.de
Ein gutes und erfolgreiches Jahr wuenscht ihnen X-PCs.de !!! Fur alle Schnappchen-Jager : ## # X-PCs gibt ab 20.01.03 10% Rabatt auf alle Rechner # ## Fur alle Gewinner: #

Re: Debian's XFree86 4.2 and SiS vs. DRI

2002-12-31 Thread Thomas Winischhofer
Michel Dänzer wrote: Is SiS DRI even supposed to work in 4.2.x? I know that it most definitely won't work in 4.3.0 because it hasn't been maintained in a while. It is, I assume. Otherwise how should one explain why just exchanging sis_dri.so makes it work? The logical consequence can only be t

Re: Debian's XFree86 4.2 and SiS vs. DRI

2002-12-31 Thread Thomas Winischhofer
Michel Dänzer wrote: Is SiS DRI even supposed to work in 4.2.x? I know that it most definitely won't work in 4.3.0 because it hasn't been maintained in a while. It is, I assume. Otherwise how should one explain why just exchanging sis_dri.so makes it work? The logical consequence can only be th