Bug#174915: xf86PciInfo.h does not have appropriate data for my card, even though XFree86 found valid card configuration.

2003-01-01 Thread Sungjong Woo
Package: XFree86 Version: 4.1.0.1 I am sending this e-mail once again since I didn't include Package information before. When I ran /usr/bin/x11/xf86cfg, it gave me this error message. XFree86 found a valid card

Fwd: Possible bug in installation

2003-01-01 Thread Chris Tillman
This message appeared on debian-boot. Skip, please check for responses on debian-x. - Forwarded message from Skip Queen [EMAIL PROTECTED] - Date: 01 Jan 2003 00:54:43 -0500 From: Skip Queen [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Mailer: Ximian Evolution 1.0.8-3mdk To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Possible

Bug#174685: marked as done (xserver-xfree86: quake3 unable to receive some DGA mouse events)

2003-01-01 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Wed, 1 Jan 2003 13:29:10 -0500 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Bug#174685: xserver-xfree86: quake3 unable to receive some DGA mouse events has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt

Processed: tagging 174282

2003-01-01 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: tag 174282 + upstream Bug#174282: xlibs: Xpm needs LONG64 on Alpha There were no tags set. Tags added: upstream End of message, stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator

Bug#174915: marked as done (xf86PciInfo.h does not have appropriate data for my card, even though XFree86 found valid card configuration.)

2003-01-01 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Wed, 1 Jan 2003 13:50:44 -0500 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Bug#174915: xf86PciInfo.h does not have appropriate data for my card, even though XFree86 found valid card configuration. has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that

Bug#172962: IPv6 support (more info)

2003-01-01 Thread Branden Robinson
On Mon, Dec 16, 2002 at 07:39:16PM +0100, Fabio Massimo Di Nitto wrote: I hope this will make some things more clear about the IPv6 status. [...] At this point in time I would suggest to proceed with inclusion and be ready to merge with 4.3.0, test and send upstream. More than rejecting the

Bug#168178: [savage] runs out of MTRRs on unknown chipset (0x8c2e) rev 5

2003-01-01 Thread Branden Robinson
On Wed, Dec 11, 2002 at 11:42:23PM +0100, Juliusz Chroboczek wrote: This is fixed in upstream CVS. It is due to the 4.2 version of the Savage driver mis-detecting the video memory size. A workaround is to set the size in your XF86Config-4 explicitly using the VideoRam keyword. A proper

Bug#170510: X server build problem fix

2003-01-01 Thread ISHIKAWA Mutsumi
In [EMAIL PROTECTED] Branden Robinson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Tue, Dec 31, 2002 at 01:24:01AM +0900, ISHIKAWA Mutsumi wrote: Hi, Here is a patch for #170508, #170510. Thanks so much for this patch. I knew the bug could be fixed this way but I was hoping someone would fix the

Bug#172962: IPv6 support (more info)

2003-01-01 Thread Fabio Massimo Di Nitto
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On Wed, 1 Jan 2003, Branden Robinson wrote: On Mon, Dec 16, 2002 at 07:39:16PM +0100, Fabio Massimo Di Nitto wrote: I hope this will make some things more clear about the IPv6 status. [...] At this point in time I would suggest to proceed with

Processed: tagging 172962

2003-01-01 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: tag 172962 + moreinfo Bug#172962: IPv6 support Tags were: patch sid Tags added: moreinfo End of message, stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs

Bug#170510: Bug#170508: Bug#170510: X server build problem fix

2003-01-01 Thread Branden Robinson
On Thu, Jan 02, 2003 at 05:17:50AM +0900, ISHIKAWA Mutsumi wrote: Compiling XFree86 with this patch does not refer X11/* headers out of the source tree. Right. Of cause Build-Depends: xlibs-dev is not needed. Nor should it ever be. Source packages that Build-Depend on themselves are

Bug#172962: IPv6 support (more info)

2003-01-01 Thread Branden Robinson
On Wed, Jan 01, 2003 at 10:59:25PM +0100, Fabio Massimo Di Nitto wrote: On Wed, 1 Jan 2003, Branden Robinson wrote: I will not have Debian's XFree86 packages break protocol compatibility with upstream XFree86. Of course this is a very very good argument perfectly understandable. I'm not

Processed: XftConfig bullshit

2003-01-01 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: retitle 97506 xlibs: XftConfig blues Bug#97506: xbase-clients: [XftConfig] suggested additions for default XftConfig file Changed Bug title. retitle 166335 xlibs: XftConfig blues Bug#166335: xlibs: default XftConfig file could be improved Changed Bug

Processed: tagging 165146

2003-01-01 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: tag 165146 + moreinfo Bug#165146: imake: macro definition problem Tags were: sid upstream Tags added: moreinfo End of message, stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator

Processed: retitle 165146 to xlibs-dev: $(SOSYMLINK) not expanding in gnuLib.rules

2003-01-01 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: retitle 165146 xlibs-dev: $(SOSYMLINK) not expanding in gnuLib.rules Bug#165146: imake: macro definition problem Changed Bug title. End of message, stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system

Bug#165146: imake: macro definition problem

2003-01-01 Thread Branden Robinson
On Fri, Oct 18, 2002 at 12:29:33AM +0200, Erwin Burgstaller wrote: Ok, I see. I've tracked down the problem more carefully now: The SOSYMLINK problem maybe solved by including Library.tmpl in Imake.rules: I don't think that's the right fix, either. What I need to know is why this construct

Bug#172325: xlibs fails to install (overwrite problems)

2003-01-01 Thread Branden Robinson
Please don't reply to 172325-quiet; I never saw your reply. If you think its a case of you last installed some packages when Bruce was around, what do you expect kind of bug then close it. I just wanted to make sure there wasn't some evil overlapping going on. It was evil, but it's been

Bug#166448: marked as done (xdm: prerm script hangs while stopping xdm)

2003-01-01 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Wed, 1 Jan 2003 18:47:37 -0500 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line closing bug from unresponsive submitter has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now

Bug#173229: marked as done ()

2003-01-01 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Wed, 1 Jan 2003 19:16:04 -0500 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line closing untitled, sloppily filed report has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now

Processed: Re: Bug#173071: Pasting text with NULL character crashes

2003-01-01 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: severity 173071 important Bug#173071: Pasting text with NULL character crashes Severity set to `important'. retitle 173071 xterm: crashes when pasting text with NULL character in it Bug#173071: Pasting text with NULL character crashes Changed Bug

Processed: severity of 173071 is important

2003-01-01 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: severity 173071 important Bug#173071: xterm: crashes when pasting text with NULL character in it Severity set to `important'. End of message, stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system

Bug#173357: marked as done (Dexconf hacked with detect)

2003-01-01 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Wed, 1 Jan 2003 19:12:35 -0500 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Bug#173357: Dexconf hacked with detect has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now

Bug#172550: please split at least xft1 out of xlibs-dev (needed for libxft2-dev)

2003-01-01 Thread Branden Robinson
On Tue, Dec 10, 2002 at 01:59:02PM -0500, Colin Walters wrote: Well, it's up to you, really. If you split out just xft1, that would work for me. However, as you said on IRC, if you're going to split it, you might as well split it all the way. That way if anything else comes along later it

Bug#173189: marked as done (xfree86-common: two clipboard?)

2003-01-01 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Wed, 1 Jan 2003 19:19:36 -0500 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Bug#173189: xfree86-common: two clipboard? has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is

Processed: some retitling and other triage

2003-01-01 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: retitle 174589 xlibs: libXrender shlib dependency needs to be bumped to 4.2.0 Bug#174589: libXrender API change, shlibs needs updating Changed Bug title. retitle 174282 xlibs: [libXpm] SEGV on Alpha due to undefined LONG64 symbol at compile time

Re: Possible bug in installation

2003-01-01 Thread Eduard Bloch
#include hallo.h * Skip Queen [Wed, Jan 01 2003, 12:54:43AM]: I have tried to install Debian Woody 3.0 a total of six times and each time the same thing happens. My video is all screwed up. XWindows does not work. When I pick up video card (i810) it won't work at all. If I pick VESA it

Re: Debian's XFree86 4.2 and SiS vs. DRI

2003-01-01 Thread Thomas Winischhofer
Michel Dänzer wrote: On Die, 2002-12-31 at 10:31, Thomas Winischhofer wrote: Michel Dänzer wrote: Is SiS DRI even supposed to work in 4.2.x? I know that it most definitely won't work in 4.3.0 because it hasn't been maintained in a while. It is, I assume. Assumptions tend to be flawed. :)

Bug#170948: marked as done (Xlib: connection to :0.0 refused by server)

2003-01-01 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Wed, 1 Jan 2003 19:36:16 -0500 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line closing bug from unresponsive submitter has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now

Re: Debian's XFree86 4.2 and SiS vs. DRI

2003-01-01 Thread Michel Dänzer
On Don, 2003-01-02 at 01:54, Thomas Winischhofer wrote: Michel Dänzer wrote: There were no significant changes in the code either, as I saw in my comparison. (Mesa is of the same version, too.) I guess it's still possible that the interface between the common client side DRI code and

Newsletter Anmeldung

2003-01-01 Thread www.cashgalaxy.de.vu - Geldverdienen im Internet
Herzlich Willkommen! Sie wurden soeben beim kostenlosen Newsletter von www.cashgalaxy.de.vu - Geldverdienen im Internet angemeldet. WICHTIG: Bitte bestätigen Sie dieses Abonnement, indem Sie auf folgenden Link klicken: http://www.newsletterboy.de/add_mail.php?id=8878[EMAIL PROTECTED] Durch

Bug#170510: Bug#170508: Bug#170510: X server build problem fix

2003-01-01 Thread ISHIKAWA Mutsumi
In [EMAIL PROTECTED] Branden Robinson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: This fix is not enough for these bug reports? It's enough, but it's not, in my opinion, optimal. It's silly to compile Xlib and Xext *object* files when all that are needed are the headers. However, rectifying this

Bug#170510: Bug#170508: Bug#170510: X server build problem fix

2003-01-01 Thread ISHIKAWA Mutsumi
In [EMAIL PROTECTED] ISHIKAWA Mutsumi [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: 2) Defined `BuildServersOnly' will build only X servers. `Servers' mean `XFree86 server, Xnest server, X virtual fareme buffer server, and Xprint server'. The Xnest server requires libX11, so defined and only

Fwd: Possible bug in installation

2003-01-01 Thread Chris Tillman
This message appeared on debian-boot. Skip, please check for responses on debian-x. - Forwarded message from Skip Queen [EMAIL PROTECTED] - Date: 01 Jan 2003 00:54:43 -0500 From: Skip Queen [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Mailer: Ximian Evolution 1.0.8-3mdk To: debian-boot@lists.debian.org Subject:

Bug#174685: marked as done (xserver-xfree86: quake3 unable to receive some DGA mouse events)

2003-01-01 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Wed, 1 Jan 2003 13:29:10 -0500 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Bug#174685: xserver-xfree86: quake3 unable to receive some DGA mouse events has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt

Bug#170510: X server build problem fix

2003-01-01 Thread Branden Robinson
On Tue, Dec 31, 2002 at 01:24:01AM +0900, ISHIKAWA Mutsumi wrote: Hi, Here is a patch for #170508, #170510. Thanks so much for this patch. I knew the bug could be fixed this way but I was hoping someone would fix the external dependencies instead. Oh well, that's upstream's problem, I

Processed: tagging 174282

2003-01-01 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: tag 174282 + upstream Bug#174282: xlibs: Xpm needs LONG64 on Alpha There were no tags set. Tags added: upstream End of message, stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator

Bug#174915: marked as done (xf86PciInfo.h does not have appropriate data for my card, even though XFree86 found valid card configuration.)

2003-01-01 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Wed, 1 Jan 2003 13:50:44 -0500 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Bug#174915: xf86PciInfo.h does not have appropriate data for my card, even though XFree86 found valid card configuration. has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that

Bug#172962: IPv6 support (more info)

2003-01-01 Thread Branden Robinson
On Mon, Dec 16, 2002 at 07:39:16PM +0100, Fabio Massimo Di Nitto wrote: I hope this will make some things more clear about the IPv6 status. [...] At this point in time I would suggest to proceed with inclusion and be ready to merge with 4.3.0, test and send upstream. More than rejecting the

Bug#168178: [savage] runs out of MTRRs on unknown chipset (0x8c2e) rev 5

2003-01-01 Thread Branden Robinson
On Wed, Dec 11, 2002 at 11:42:23PM +0100, Juliusz Chroboczek wrote: This is fixed in upstream CVS. It is due to the 4.2 version of the Savage driver mis-detecting the video memory size. A workaround is to set the size in your XF86Config-4 explicitly using the VideoRam keyword. A proper

Bug#170510: X server build problem fix

2003-01-01 Thread ISHIKAWA Mutsumi
In [EMAIL PROTECTED] Branden Robinson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Tue, Dec 31, 2002 at 01:24:01AM +0900, ISHIKAWA Mutsumi wrote: Hi, Here is a patch for #170508, #170510. Thanks so much for this patch. I knew the bug could be fixed this way but I was hoping someone would fix the

Bug#172962: IPv6 support (more info)

2003-01-01 Thread Fabio Massimo Di Nitto
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On Wed, 1 Jan 2003, Branden Robinson wrote: On Mon, Dec 16, 2002 at 07:39:16PM +0100, Fabio Massimo Di Nitto wrote: I hope this will make some things more clear about the IPv6 status. [...] At this point in time I would suggest to proceed with

Processed: tagging 172962

2003-01-01 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: tag 172962 + moreinfo Bug#172962: IPv6 support Tags were: patch sid Tags added: moreinfo End of message, stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs

Bug#170510: Bug#170508: Bug#170510: X server build problem fix

2003-01-01 Thread Branden Robinson
On Thu, Jan 02, 2003 at 05:17:50AM +0900, ISHIKAWA Mutsumi wrote: Compiling XFree86 with this patch does not refer X11/* headers out of the source tree. Right. Of cause Build-Depends: xlibs-dev is not needed. Nor should it ever be. Source packages that Build-Depend on themselves are

Bug#172962: IPv6 support (more info)

2003-01-01 Thread Branden Robinson
On Wed, Jan 01, 2003 at 10:59:25PM +0100, Fabio Massimo Di Nitto wrote: On Wed, 1 Jan 2003, Branden Robinson wrote: I will not have Debian's XFree86 packages break protocol compatibility with upstream XFree86. Of course this is a very very good argument perfectly understandable. I'm not

Processed: XftConfig bullshit

2003-01-01 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: retitle 97506 xlibs: XftConfig blues Bug#97506: xbase-clients: [XftConfig] suggested additions for default XftConfig file Changed Bug title. retitle 166335 xlibs: XftConfig blues Bug#166335: xlibs: default XftConfig file could be improved Changed Bug

Processed: tagging 165146

2003-01-01 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: tag 165146 + moreinfo Bug#165146: imake: macro definition problem Tags were: sid upstream Tags added: moreinfo End of message, stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator

Processed: retitle 165146 to xlibs-dev: $(SOSYMLINK) not expanding in gnuLib.rules

2003-01-01 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: retitle 165146 xlibs-dev: $(SOSYMLINK) not expanding in gnuLib.rules Bug#165146: imake: macro definition problem Changed Bug title. End of message, stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system

Bug#165146: imake: macro definition problem

2003-01-01 Thread Branden Robinson
On Fri, Oct 18, 2002 at 12:29:33AM +0200, Erwin Burgstaller wrote: Ok, I see. I've tracked down the problem more carefully now: The SOSYMLINK problem maybe solved by including Library.tmpl in Imake.rules: I don't think that's the right fix, either. What I need to know is why this construct

Bug#172325: xlibs fails to install (overwrite problems)

2003-01-01 Thread Branden Robinson
Please don't reply to 172325-quiet; I never saw your reply. If you think its a case of you last installed some packages when Bruce was around, what do you expect kind of bug then close it. I just wanted to make sure there wasn't some evil overlapping going on. It was evil, but it's been

Bug#166448: marked as done (xdm: prerm script hangs while stopping xdm)

2003-01-01 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Wed, 1 Jan 2003 18:47:37 -0500 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line closing bug from unresponsive submitter has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now

Re: Possible bug in installation

2003-01-01 Thread Eduard Bloch
#include hallo.h * Skip Queen [Wed, Jan 01 2003, 12:54:43AM]: I have tried to install Debian Woody 3.0 a total of six times and each time the same thing happens. My video is all screwed up. XWindows does not work. When I pick up video card (i810) it won't work at all. If I pick VESA it

Bug#173229: marked as done ()

2003-01-01 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Wed, 1 Jan 2003 19:16:04 -0500 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line closing untitled, sloppily filed report has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now

Processed: Re: Bug#173071: Pasting text with NULL character crashes

2003-01-01 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: severity 173071 important Bug#173071: Pasting text with NULL character crashes Severity set to `important'. retitle 173071 xterm: crashes when pasting text with NULL character in it Bug#173071: Pasting text with NULL character crashes Changed Bug

Processed: severity of 173071 is important

2003-01-01 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: severity 173071 important Bug#173071: xterm: crashes when pasting text with NULL character in it Severity set to `important'. End of message, stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system

Bug#173357: marked as done (Dexconf hacked with detect)

2003-01-01 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Wed, 1 Jan 2003 19:12:35 -0500 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Bug#173357: Dexconf hacked with detect has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now

Bug#172550: please split at least xft1 out of xlibs-dev (needed for libxft2-dev)

2003-01-01 Thread Branden Robinson
On Tue, Dec 10, 2002 at 01:59:02PM -0500, Colin Walters wrote: Well, it's up to you, really. If you split out just xft1, that would work for me. However, as you said on IRC, if you're going to split it, you might as well split it all the way. That way if anything else comes along later it

Bug#173189: marked as done (xfree86-common: two clipboard?)

2003-01-01 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Wed, 1 Jan 2003 19:19:36 -0500 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Bug#173189: xfree86-common: two clipboard? has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is

Bug#173071: Pasting text with NULL character crashes

2003-01-01 Thread Branden Robinson
severity 173071 important retitle 173071 xterm: crashes when pasting text with NULL character in it tag 173071 + moreinfo upstream unreproducible thanks On Sat, Dec 14, 2002 at 09:33:07PM +0200, Ilya Konstantinov wrote: Package: xterm Version: 4.2.1-4 xterm crashes when you try to paste into

Processed: some retitling and other triage

2003-01-01 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: retitle 174589 xlibs: libXrender shlib dependency needs to be bumped to 4.2.0 Bug#174589: libXrender API change, shlibs needs updating Changed Bug title. retitle 174282 xlibs: [libXpm] SEGV on Alpha due to undefined LONG64 symbol at compile time

Re: Debian's XFree86 4.2 and SiS vs. DRI

2003-01-01 Thread Thomas Winischhofer
Michel Dänzer wrote: On Die, 2002-12-31 at 10:31, Thomas Winischhofer wrote: Michel Dänzer wrote: Is SiS DRI even supposed to work in 4.2.x? I know that it most definitely won't work in 4.3.0 because it hasn't been maintained in a while. It is, I assume. Assumptions tend to be flawed.

Bug#170948: marked as done (Xlib: connection to :0.0 refused by server)

2003-01-01 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Wed, 1 Jan 2003 19:36:16 -0500 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line closing bug from unresponsive submitter has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now

Re: Debian's XFree86 4.2 and SiS vs. DRI

2003-01-01 Thread Michel Dänzer
On Don, 2003-01-02 at 01:54, Thomas Winischhofer wrote: Michel Dänzer wrote: There were no significant changes in the code either, as I saw in my comparison. (Mesa is of the same version, too.) I guess it's still possible that the interface between the common client side DRI code and

Newsletter Anmeldung

2003-01-01 Thread www.cashgalaxy.de.vu - Geldverdienen im Internet
Herzlich Willkommen! Sie wurden soeben beim kostenlosen Newsletter von www.cashgalaxy.de.vu - Geldverdienen im Internet angemeldet. WICHTIG: Bitte bestätigen Sie dieses Abonnement, indem Sie auf folgenden Link klicken: http://www.newsletterboy.de/add_mail.php?id=8878[EMAIL PROTECTED] Durch

Bug#170510: Bug#170508: Bug#170510: X server build problem fix

2003-01-01 Thread ISHIKAWA Mutsumi
In [EMAIL PROTECTED] Branden Robinson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: This fix is not enough for these bug reports? It's enough, but it's not, in my opinion, optimal. It's silly to compile Xlib and Xext *object* files when all that are needed are the headers. However, rectifying this

Bug#174915: xf86PciInfo.h does not have appropriate data for my card, even though XFree86 found valid card configuration.

2003-01-01 Thread Sungjong Woo
Package: XFree86 Version: 4.1.0.1 I am sending this e-mail once again since I didn't include Package information before. When I ran /usr/bin/x11/xf86cfg, it gave me this error message. XFree86 found a valid card