Package: xlibs
Version: 4.2.1-5
Severity: important
Thanks for maintaining Debian's xlibs package.
I use it.
When I tried to upgrade xlibs to version 4.2.1-5 with apt-get install,
it reported
Unpacking replacement xlibs ...
dpkg: error processing
Package: xterm
Version: 4.2.1-5, 4.2.99.4-2
Severity: normal
Tags: patch
Hello,
uxterm script contains a sed expression to create a proper LC_CTYPE
setting if your locale was not *.UTF-8 before. Unfortunately, it does
not match the new locales names used by Debian (fr_FR@euro). The
attached
Package: XFree86
Version: 4.1.0.1
Dear fellows,
I'm trying to install my woody but can't start the X window driver.
I've changed yet the video card - before Hercules 128 Video, now ELSA
Erazor III LT - but can't deal with X in any way.
I set the bus id to PCI:01:00:00 for the lspci routine
Your message dated Wed, 5 Feb 2003 14:29:23 -0500
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Bug#179635: trying to overwrite ...X11/app-defaults
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
merge 178496 179894
Bug#178496: xserver-xfree86: [core server] module loading broken on Alpha due to GCC
3.2's new relocation type
Bug#179894: xserver-xfree86: Can't start X server (unresolved symbols).
Bug#178358: xserver-xfree86: [core server] module
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
retitle 179904 xfree86-common: Xsession could use xmessage to display errors
Bug#179904: xfree86-common: No message to the user when xdm/kdm login fails
Changed Bug title.
severity 179904 wishlist
Bug#179904: xfree86-common: Xsession could use
Your message dated Wed, 5 Feb 2003 14:48:13 -0500
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Bug#179921: xlibs: Overwrites /usr/X11R6/lib/X11/app-defaults
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
tag 179929 + upstream
Bug#179929: insufficient regexp in uxterm wrapper
Tags were: patch
Tags added: upstream
End of message, stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system administrator
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
reassign 179933 xserver-xfree86
Bug#179933:
Bug reassigned from package `xfree86' to `xserver-xfree86'.
severity 179933 normal
Bug#179933:
Severity set to `normal'.
retitle 179933 xserver-xfree86: [nv] no screens found on Riva Ultra 64 rev 21
On Wed, Feb 05, 2003 at 05:51:42PM +0200, Dimitar Kavlakov wrote:
Quite starnge... I never worked with the bug report tool before and
tought that the description of the problem it asks for is supposed to be
part of the bug report (actualy why is it needed?). I'll have in mind to
describe
In the future, you might want to use the reportbug package and command
of the same name to report problems with Debian GNU/Linux. The report
you filed:
1) had no subject;
2) was filed against the wrong package;
3) was not filed against a specific Debian package version; and
4) did not include
merge 178496 179894
thanks
On Wed, Feb 05, 2003 at 12:02:39PM +, Matt Hodges wrote:
I can't start an X server with this version; there are unresolved
symbols such as __glXLastContext. Version 4.2.1-3 works, and I've
downgraded to this.
There are also thousands of Elf_RelocateEntry
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
retitle 179929 xterm: uxterm's regexp doesn't catch modifiers in locale settings
Bug#179929: insufficient regexp in uxterm wrapper
Changed Bug title.
End of message, stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
retitle 179894 xserver-xfree86: [core server] module loading broken on Alpha due to
GCC 3.2's new relocation type
Bug#179894: xserver-xfree86: Can't start X server (unresolved symbols).
Changed Bug title.
End of message, stopping processing here.
On Mit, 2003-02-05 at 21:24, Branden Robinson wrote:
Given that the soversion isn't terribly meaningful in the case of Mesa,
in my opinion the library package name should communicate the major
version number of Mesa itself.
I still don't see how that is meaningful.
However, Policy
This seems to work. Only light testing so far, though. I called it
454_ia64_XlcDL.c_hack.diff
Bdale
From Bdale Garbee, a quick hack to get ia64 compiling again since none of us
really understand what the point of this bit is, and it doesn't seem relevant
on ia64 which is also an LP64
On Wed, Feb 05, 2003 at 11:32:55PM +0100, Michel D?nzer wrote:
On Mit, 2003-02-05 at 21:24, Branden Robinson wrote:
Given that the soversion isn't terribly meaningful in the case of Mesa,
in my opinion the library package name should communicate the major
version number of Mesa itself.
On Wed, Feb 05, 2003 at 03:53:04PM -0700, Bdale Garbee wrote:
This seems to work. Only light testing so far, though. I called it
454_ia64_XlcDL.c_hack.diff
Bdale
Thanks, Bdale!
Content-Description: patch for X to build on ia64 again
From Bdale Garbee, a quick hack to get ia64
On Wed, Feb 05, 2003 at 09:27:28AM +1100, Daniel Stone wrote:
Marcelo was wondering why I bumped the name to xlibmesa4-* for my
packages, and I pointed out that having xlibmesa3-*, for Mesa 4,
would be horrifically stupid and misleading.
JFTR, no, I wasn't. Michel was courteous enough to
Package: xserver-xfree86
Version: 4.2.1-5
Severity: important
I can't start an X server with this version; there are unresolved
symbols such as __glXLastContext. Version 4.2.1-3 works, and I've
downgraded to this.
There are also thousands of Elf_RelocateEntry errors in the log file:
Package: xfree86-common
Version: 4.1.0-16
When the user tries to log in using kdm, and his home directory is
full, the user is thrown out to the login screen without any
explanation. I believe the user should get some kind of error message
displayed on the screen when this happen, to avoid
On вт, 2003-02-04 at 18:12, Branden Robinson wrote:
tag 179789 + moreinfo
thanks
On Tue, Feb 04, 2003 at 05:13:18PM +0200, Dimitar Kavlakov wrote:
Package: xserver-xfree86
Version: 4.2.1-5
Severity: normal
Tags: sid
Supplying the computer-generated parts of the bug report was
Package: xlibs
Version: 4.2.1-5
Severity: important
Thanks for maintaining Debian's xlibs package.
I use it.
When I tried to upgrade xlibs to version 4.2.1-5 with apt-get install,
it reported
Unpacking replacement xlibs ...
dpkg: error processing
Package: xterm
Version: 4.2.1-5, 4.2.99.4-2
Severity: normal
Tags: patch
Hello,
uxterm script contains a sed expression to create a proper LC_CTYPE
setting if your locale was not *.UTF-8 before. Unfortunately, it does
not match the new locales names used by Debian ([EMAIL PROTECTED]). The
Package: XFree86
Version: 4.1.0.1
Dear fellows,
I'm trying to install my woody but can't start the X window driver.
I've changed yet the video card - before Hercules 128 Video, now ELSA
Erazor III LT - but can't deal with X in any way.
I set the bus id to PCI:01:00:00 for the lspci routine
Your message dated Wed, 5 Feb 2003 14:29:23 -0500
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Bug#179635: trying to overwrite ...X11/app-defaults
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
merge 178496 179894
Bug#178496: xserver-xfree86: [core server] module loading broken on Alpha due
to GCC 3.2's new relocation type
Bug#179894: xserver-xfree86: Can't start X server (unresolved symbols).
Bug#178358: xserver-xfree86: [core server] module
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
retitle 179904 xfree86-common: Xsession could use xmessage to display errors
Bug#179904: xfree86-common: No message to the user when xdm/kdm login fails
Changed Bug title.
severity 179904 wishlist
Bug#179904: xfree86-common: Xsession could use
Your message dated Wed, 5 Feb 2003 14:48:13 -0500
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Bug#179921: xlibs: Overwrites /usr/X11R6/lib/X11/app-defaults
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is
Your message dated Wed, 5 Feb 2003 14:37:49 -0500
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Bug#179851: xserver-xfree86
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
tag 179929 + upstream
Bug#179929: insufficient regexp in uxterm wrapper
Tags were: patch
Tags added: upstream
End of message, stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system administrator
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
reassign 179933 xserver-xfree86
Bug#179933:
Bug reassigned from package `xfree86' to `xserver-xfree86'.
severity 179933 normal
Bug#179933:
Severity set to `normal'.
retitle 179933 xserver-xfree86: [nv] no screens found on Riva Ultra 64 rev 21
On Wed, Feb 05, 2003 at 05:51:42PM +0200, Dimitar Kavlakov wrote:
Quite starnge... I never worked with the bug report tool before and
tought that the description of the problem it asks for is supposed to be
part of the bug report (actualy why is it needed?). I'll have in mind to
describe
In the future, you might want to use the reportbug package and command
of the same name to report problems with Debian GNU/Linux. The report
you filed:
1) had no subject;
2) was filed against the wrong package;
3) was not filed against a specific Debian package version; and
4) did not include
merge 178496 179894
thanks
On Wed, Feb 05, 2003 at 12:02:39PM +, Matt Hodges wrote:
I can't start an X server with this version; there are unresolved
symbols such as __glXLastContext. Version 4.2.1-3 works, and I've
downgraded to this.
There are also thousands of Elf_RelocateEntry
On Wed, Feb 05, 2003 at 09:27:28AM +1100, Daniel Stone wrote:
While you may be right, we're talking about different things. :)
Marcelo was wondering why I bumped the name to xlibmesa4-* for my
packages, and I pointed out that having xlibmesa3-*, for Mesa 4, would
be horrifically stupid and
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
retitle 179929 xterm: uxterm's regexp doesn't catch modifiers in locale
settings
Bug#179929: insufficient regexp in uxterm wrapper
Changed Bug title.
End of message, stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
retitle 179894 xserver-xfree86: [core server] module loading broken on Alpha
due to GCC 3.2's new relocation type
Bug#179894: xserver-xfree86: Can't start X server (unresolved symbols).
Changed Bug title.
End of message, stopping processing here.
On Mit, 2003-02-05 at 21:24, Branden Robinson wrote:
Given that the soversion isn't terribly meaningful in the case of Mesa,
in my opinion the library package name should communicate the major
version number of Mesa itself.
I still don't see how that is meaningful.
However, Policy
This seems to work. Only light testing so far, though. I called it
454_ia64_XlcDL.c_hack.diff
Bdale
From Bdale Garbee, a quick hack to get ia64 compiling again since none of us
really understand what the point of this bit is, and it doesn't seem relevant
on ia64 which is also an LP64
On Wed, Feb 05, 2003 at 11:32:55PM +0100, Michel D?nzer wrote:
On Mit, 2003-02-05 at 21:24, Branden Robinson wrote:
Given that the soversion isn't terribly meaningful in the case of Mesa,
in my opinion the library package name should communicate the major
version number of Mesa itself.
On Wed, Feb 05, 2003 at 03:53:04PM -0700, Bdale Garbee wrote:
This seems to work. Only light testing so far, though. I called it
454_ia64_XlcDL.c_hack.diff
Bdale
Thanks, Bdale!
Content-Description: patch for X to build on ia64 again
From Bdale Garbee, a quick hack to get ia64
42 matches
Mail list logo
