I'm not convinced Felix's bug is the same as mine -- my problems were
with gdm rather than xdm (which has always cooperated quite nicely,
thank you ;-)), and have been better since 4.2.0. (I have seen some
other gdm weirdness on this machine in later tests, but no server
crashes or hangs.)
On a w
I'm not convinced Felix's bug is the same as mine -- my problems were
with gdm rather than xdm (which has always cooperated quite nicely,
thank you ;-)), and have been better since 4.2.0. (I have seen some
other gdm weirdness on this machine in later tests, but no server
crashes or hangs.)
On a w
Package: xserver-common
Version: N/A; reported 2003-08-23
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable
During install of xserver-common (4.2.1-10) I get this error:
/var/lib/dpkg/info/xserver-common.postinst: line 263:
/var/lib/xfree86/Xwrapper.config.roster: No such file or directory
Package: xserver-common
Version: N/A; reported 2003-08-23
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable
During install of xserver-common (4.2.1-10) I get this error:
/var/lib/dpkg/info/xserver-common.postinst: line 263:
/var/lib/xfree86/Xwrapper.config.roster: No such file or directory
Your message dated Fri, 22 Aug 2003 13:29:42 +0100 (BST)
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line bug resolved with upstream
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your r
Your message dated Fri, 22 Aug 2003 13:29:42 +0100 (BST)
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line bug resolved with upstream
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your r
Paseandome un poco por la página del bien amado Thomas Winischhofer me
he encontrado con esta noticia:
"Currently, I am busy rewriting the 2D acceleration part for the 315 and
330 series to use a new kind of command queue mode (VRAM queue). Works
already, but requires some testing before I will
Paseandome un poco por la página del bien amado Thomas Winischhofer me
he encontrado con esta noticia:
"Currently, I am busy rewriting the 2D acceleration part for the 315 and
330 series to use a new kind of command queue mode (VRAM queue). Works
already, but requires some testing before I will
On Thu, Aug 21, 2003 at 04:24:46PM -0500, Branden Robinson wrote:
> (Hmm, maybe you could use tmpfs for /tmp, and mount the same one in both
> the real root and the chroot? I've never tried this myself.)
Doesn't help as tmpfs instances are compeltly separate. You could
mount --bind the real /tmp
On Thu, 21 Aug 2003, Branden Robinson wrote:
> Out of curiosity, how can doing the chdir() break anything? A relative
> symlink has to be resolved relative to the directory in which the
Because now you're in a different directory than you expect. However,
since this is just exec()ing the X serve
10 matches
Mail list logo
