i get "Couldn't load XKB keymap, falling back to pre-XKB keymap". the error does not
tell, which
one it tries to load.
i use 4.2.1-9, 4.2.1-10.
__
Do you Yahoo!?
Yahoo! SiteBuilder - Free, easy-to-use web site design software
http://sitebuilder.yahoo.com
--
To
On Thu, Aug 28, 2003 at 02:51:07AM +0200, Eduard Bloch wrote:
> > > Option "SWcursor" is only needed in a minority of cases as well (and
> > > then it's a driver bug which should simply be fixed), but you even want
>
> Of course it is a driver but, but not giving it a chance to appear is
> IMO a b
This is an automatic message from the Guinevere
Internet Antivirus Scanner.
A message was received from you with a subject of Re: That movie
The message was addressed to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
The message probably contains a virus.
You will want to consult with your system administator on how
Oh, balls. Retract my observersation about -n ignoring whitespace. It
doesn't.
Sigh. Just not my day.
--
G. Branden Robinson|I am sorry, but what you have
Debian GNU/Linux |mistaken for malicious intent is
[EMAIL PROTECTED] |nothin
On Thu, Aug 28, 2003 at 02:37:13PM -0400, Aaron M. Ucko wrote:
> X Strike Force SVN Admin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > - if [ -n "$(cat "$XWRAPPER_CONFIG_ROSTER.dpkg-tmp")" ]; then
> > + if [ -n "$(cat "$XWRAPPER_CONFIG_ROSTER.dpkg-tmp" 2> /dev/null)" ]; then
>
> Incidentally, you
On Thu, Aug 28, 2003 at 10:47:41AM -0400, Brian Almeida wrote:
> On Thursday 28 August 2003 08:07 am, Brian Almeida wrote:
> > [Please CC me as I am not subscribed to debian-x]
> I got some more info by install xserver-xfree86-dbg and getting
> a backtrace:
>
> Program received signal SIGSEGV, Seg
On Thu, Aug 28, 2003 at 02:37:13PM -0400, Aaron M. Ucko wrote:
> X Strike Force SVN Admin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > - if [ -n "$(cat "$XWRAPPER_CONFIG_ROSTER.dpkg-tmp")" ]; then
> > + if [ -n "$(cat "$XWRAPPER_CONFIG_ROSTER.dpkg-tmp" 2> /dev/null)" ]; then
>
> Incidentally, you
On Thu, Aug 28, 2003 at 02:36:49AM -0500, X Strike Force SVN Admin wrote:
> Author: daniel
> Date: 2003-08-28 02:36:42 -0500 (Thu, 28 Aug 2003)
> New Revision: 452
>
> Modified:
>branches/4.3.0/sid/debian/patches/000_stolen_from_HEAD.diff
> Log:
> * debian/patches/000_stolen_from_HEAD.diff: ad
X Strike Force SVN Admin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> - if [ -n "$(cat "$XWRAPPER_CONFIG_ROSTER.dpkg-tmp")" ]; then
> + if [ -n "$(cat "$XWRAPPER_CONFIG_ROSTER.dpkg-tmp" 2> /dev/null)" ]; then
Incidentally, you could just use -s here...
$ ls -l foo bar baz
ls: foo: No such file or dir
Author: branden
Date: 2003-08-28 13:23:51 -0500 (Thu, 28 Aug 2003)
New Revision: 454
Modified:
trunk/debian/changelog
trunk/debian/xserver-xfree86.preinst.in
trunk/debian/xserver-xfree86.prerm.in
Log:
debian/xserver-xfree86.preinst.in: when installing (not upgrading)
xserver-xfree86*, p
Thank you, this seemed to fix it, although I had to do it twice.
Joshua McClintock
Systems Engineer
Singlestep Technologies
Connect. Simplify. Manage.
2320 First Avenue
Suite 200
Seattle, WA 98121
P: 206.448.9700
F: 206.448.2666
E: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.singlestep.com
On Tue, 26 Aug 2
Title: eoU
Debian-x OZzZT to see you QdI .
It's funny bmu L
nmtTCmtxcAz Good night!
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> reassign 207638 xserver-common,xfree86
Bug#207638: xserver-common 4.2.1-10 won't install sanely on clean system
Bug reassigned from package `xserver-common' to `xserver-common,xfree86'.
> severity 207638 important
Bug#207638: xserver-common 4.2.1-10 wo
On Thu, Aug 28, 2003 at 10:47:41AM -0400, Brian Almeida wrote:
> On Thursday 28 August 2003 08:07 am, Brian Almeida wrote:
> > [Please CC me as I am not subscribed to debian-x]
> I got some more info by install xserver-xfree86-dbg and getting
> a backtrace:
>
> Program received signal SIGSEGV, Seg
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> tag 207575 - moreinfo
Bug#207575: xserver-xfree86: X server cannot open log file
Tags were: moreinfo
Tags removed: moreinfo
>
End of message, stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system administrator
Your message dated Thu, 28 Aug 2003 10:37:24 -0500
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#207575: xserver-xfree86 4.2.1-10 XF86Config-4 and XFree86.0.log
error
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with
Author: branden
Date: 2003-08-28 10:46:55 -0500 (Thu, 28 Aug 2003)
New Revision: 453
Modified:
trunk/debian/xserver-xfree86.preinst.in
Log:
debian/xserver-xfree86.preinst.in: whee! another subtle logic error!
test -e tests the existence of a symlink *target* if its argument is a
symlink, so
On Thursday 28 August 2003 08:07 am, Brian Almeida wrote:
> [Please CC me as I am not subscribed to debian-x]
I got some more info by install xserver-xfree86-dbg and getting
a backtrace:
Program received signal SIGSEGV, Segmentation fault.
0x08649121 in __glXCreateDrawablePrivate (pDraw=0x8bd7f80,
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Package: xserver-common
Version: 4.2.1-10
When installing xserver first time on fresh system I get following error
message:
Setting up xserver-common (4.2.1-10) ...
/var/lib/dpkg/info/xserver-common.postinst: line 263:
/var/lib/xfree86/Xwrapper.con
On Wed, Aug 27, 2003 at 05:56:01PM +0200, Eduard Bloch wrote:
> #include
> * Michel Dänzer [Wed, Aug 27 2003, 05:26:19PM]:
> > > > should a Debian package really special-case buggy non-free software?
> > >
> > > So? The framebuffer driver in the kernel is non-free? Please look where
> > > "nvidia
Your message dated Thu, 28 Aug 2003 10:37:24 -0500
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#207575: xserver-xfree86 4.2.1-10 XF86Config-4 and
XFree86.0.log error
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with
On Thu, Aug 28, 2003 at 02:36:49AM -0500, X Strike Force SVN Admin wrote:
> Author: daniel
> Date: 2003-08-28 02:36:42 -0500 (Thu, 28 Aug 2003)
> New Revision: 452
>
> Modified:
>branches/4.3.0/sid/debian/patches/000_stolen_from_HEAD.diff
> Log:
> * debian/patches/000_stolen_from_HEAD.diff: ad
On Thu, Aug 28, 2003 at 09:26:23AM +0200, David N. Welton wrote:
> Sven Luther <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > On Wed, Aug 27, 2003 at 03:14:54AM -0500, Branden Robinson wrote:
> > > On Wed, Aug 27, 2003 at 07:34:55AM +0200, Sven Luther wrote:
>
> > > > This don't bring us much, it is hanging i
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Package: xserver-common
Version: 4.2.1-10
When installing xserver first time on fresh system I get following error
message:
Setting up xserver-common (4.2.1-10) ...
/var/lib/dpkg/info/xserver-common.postinst: line 263:
/var/lib/xfree86/Xwrapper.con
X Strike Force SVN Admin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> - if [ -n "$(cat "$XWRAPPER_CONFIG_ROSTER.dpkg-tmp")" ]; then
> + if [ -n "$(cat "$XWRAPPER_CONFIG_ROSTER.dpkg-tmp" 2> /dev/null)" ];
> then
Incidentally, you could just use -s here...
$ ls -l foo bar baz
ls: foo: No such file or
On Wed, 2003-08-27 at 21:57, Andreas Schuldei wrote:
>
> this patch makes it possibel to select which busid the xserver
> should operate on. this is handy if two or more graphic cards in
> a box run independent xservers and need to reset the card
> independently from the other xserver. this patch
[Please CC me as I am not subscribed to debian-x]
Hi,
I was playing around with the 4.3.0-0pre1v1 debs from experimental last
night, and after upgrading and compiling/installing the new dri kernel modules
from xlibmesa-drm-src, quake3 1.32b reliably crashes X with a signal 11.
DRI was enabled (ve
On Thu, Aug 28, 2003 at 09:26:23AM +0200, David N. Welton wrote:
> Sven Luther <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > On Wed, Aug 27, 2003 at 03:14:54AM -0500, Branden Robinson wrote:
> > > On Wed, Aug 27, 2003 at 07:34:55AM +0200, Sven Luther wrote:
>
> > > > This don't bring us much, it is hanging i
Thank you, this seemed to fix it, although I had to do it twice.
Joshua McClintock
Systems Engineer
Singlestep Technologies
Connect. Simplify. Manage.
2320 First Avenue
Suite 200
Seattle, WA 98121
P: 206.448.9700
F: 206.448.2666
E: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.singlestep.com
On Tue, 26 Aug 2
Title: eoU
Debian-x OZzZT to see you QdI .
It's funny bmu L
nmtTCmtxcAz Good night!
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> tag 207575 - moreinfo
Bug#207575: xserver-xfree86: X server cannot open log file
Tags were: moreinfo
Tags removed: moreinfo
>
End of message, stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system administrator
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> reassign 207638 xserver-common,xfree86
Bug#207638: xserver-common 4.2.1-10 won't install sanely on clean system
Bug reassigned from package `xserver-common' to `xserver-common,xfree86'.
> severity 207638 important
Bug#207638: xserver-common 4.2.1-10 wo
Author: branden
Date: 2003-08-28 10:46:55 -0500 (Thu, 28 Aug 2003)
New Revision: 453
Modified:
trunk/debian/xserver-xfree86.preinst.in
Log:
debian/xserver-xfree86.preinst.in: whee! another subtle logic error!
test -e tests the existence of a symlink *target* if its argument is a
symlink, so
On Thursday 28 August 2003 08:07 am, Brian Almeida wrote:
> [Please CC me as I am not subscribed to debian-x]
I got some more info by install xserver-xfree86-dbg and getting
a backtrace:
Program received signal SIGSEGV, Segmentation fault.
0x08649121 in __glXCreateDrawablePrivate (pDraw=0x8bd7f80,
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # merged the Synaptics driver locally, just need to do testing through builds
> # and stuff.
> tags 204688 pending
Bug#204688: Support synaptics touchpad under linux 2.6.0
There were no tags set.
Tags added: pending
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
I have just noticed, that my mail probably hadn't make it into list,
so I am resending it, if I am mistaken please forgive me for double
posting...
O.
On Thu, 2003-08-14 at 20:28, Branden Robinson wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 12, 2003 at 10:54:11AM +0200, Ond?ej Surý wrote:
> > Since Tim Roberts stopped
Author: daniel
Date: 2003-08-28 02:36:42 -0500 (Thu, 28 Aug 2003)
New Revision: 452
Modified:
branches/4.3.0/sid/debian/patches/000_stolen_from_HEAD.diff
Log:
* debian/patches/000_stolen_from_HEAD.diff: add support for missing ia64
relocations 134 and 135, thus uncrippling the ELF module load
On Thu, Aug 28, 2003 at 09:26:23AM +0200, David N. Welton wrote:
> Sven Luther <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > On Wed, Aug 27, 2003 at 03:14:54AM -0500, Branden Robinson wrote:
> > > On Wed, Aug 27, 2003 at 07:34:55AM +0200, Sven Luther wrote:
>
> > > > This don't bring us much, it is hanging i
Sven Luther <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Wed, Aug 27, 2003 at 03:14:54AM -0500, Branden Robinson wrote:
> > On Wed, Aug 27, 2003 at 07:34:55AM +0200, Sven Luther wrote:
> > > This don't bring us much, it is hanging in glint_wait, which is
> > > a macro waiting for space in the fifo, and since
On Wed, 2003-08-27 at 21:57, Andreas Schuldei wrote:
>
> this patch makes it possibel to select which busid the xserver
> should operate on. this is handy if two or more graphic cards in
> a box run independent xservers and need to reset the card
> independently from the other xserver. this patch
Author: daniel
Date: 2003-08-28 02:36:42 -0500 (Thu, 28 Aug 2003)
New Revision: 452
Modified:
branches/4.3.0/sid/debian/patches/000_stolen_from_HEAD.diff
Log:
* debian/patches/000_stolen_from_HEAD.diff: add support for missing ia64
relocations 134 and 135, thus uncrippling the ELF module load
On Thu, Aug 28, 2003 at 09:26:23AM +0200, David N. Welton wrote:
> Sven Luther <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > On Wed, Aug 27, 2003 at 03:14:54AM -0500, Branden Robinson wrote:
> > > On Wed, Aug 27, 2003 at 07:34:55AM +0200, Sven Luther wrote:
>
> > > > This don't bring us much, it is hanging i
On Wed, Aug 27, 2003 at 05:56:01PM +0200, Eduard Bloch wrote:
> #include
> * Michel Dänzer [Wed, Aug 27 2003, 05:26:19PM]:
> > > > should a Debian package really special-case buggy non-free software?
> > >
> > > So? The framebuffer driver in the kernel is non-free? Please look where
> > > "nvidia
Sven Luther <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Wed, Aug 27, 2003 at 03:14:54AM -0500, Branden Robinson wrote:
> > On Wed, Aug 27, 2003 at 07:34:55AM +0200, Sven Luther wrote:
> > > This don't bring us much, it is hanging in glint_wait, which is
> > > a macro waiting for space in the fifo, and since
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # merged the Synaptics driver locally, just need to do testing through builds
> # and stuff.
> tags 204688 pending
Bug#204688: Support synaptics touchpad under linux 2.6.0
There were no tags set.
Tags added: pending
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
I have just noticed, that my mail probably hadn't make it into list,
so I am resending it, if I am mistaken please forgive me for double
posting...
O.
On Thu, 2003-08-14 at 20:28, Branden Robinson wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 12, 2003 at 10:54:11AM +0200, Ond?ej Surý wrote:
> > Since Tim Roberts stopped
On Wed, Aug 27, 2003 at 09:27:45PM -0500, Branden Robinson wrote:
...
> My feeling is that our efforts are best spent on getting a newer 4.2.1
> package into testing at this point.
Agreed.
I've placed a full set of "hand crafted" 4.2.1-9 hppa debs on:
http://gsyprf11.external.hp.com/hppa/
retitle 207575 xserver-xfree86: X server cannot open log file
tag 207575 + moreinfo
thanks
On Wed, Aug 27, 2003 at 06:10:03PM -0700, Greg Hazel wrote:
> Fatal server error:
> Cannot open log file "/var/log/XFree86.0.log"
Please file a bug report including the information asked for in the
XF86Conf
Package: xlibmesa-drm-src
Version: 4.3.0-0pre1v1
Severity: normal
Tags: patch
Small typo in debian/rules. Apply the following patch.
--- modules/xlibmesa-drm/debian/rules~ 2003-07-31 17:24:21.0 +0900
+++ modules/xlibmesa-drm/debian/rules 2003-08-26 18:25:51.0 +0900
@@ -45,7
On Wed, Aug 27, 2003 at 09:57:20PM +0200, Andreas Schuldei wrote:
> this patch makes it possibel to select which busid the xserver
> should operate on. this is handy if two or more graphic cards in
> a box run independent xservers and need to reset the card
> independently from the other xserver. t
Your message dated Wed, 27 Aug 2003 21:52:12 -0500
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line [xdm]: 4.1.x makes ia64 go boom
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your re
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> retitle 207575 xserver-xfree86: X server cannot open log file
Bug#207575: xserver-xfree86 4.2.1-10 XF86Config-4 and XFree86.0.log error
Changed Bug title.
> tag 207575 + moreinfo
Bug#207575: xserver-xfree86: X server cannot open log file
There were no
Author: branden
Date: 2003-08-27 22:19:37 -0500 (Wed, 27 Aug 2003)
New Revision: 451
Modified:
trunk/debian/changelog
trunk/debian/xserver-common.postrm.in
trunk/debian/xserver-xfree86.postrm.in
Log:
debian/xserver-{common,xfree86}.postrm.in: further robustify purge procedure;
don't fai
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> tag 199715 - fixed
Bug#199715: [xdm]: 4.1.x makes ia64 go boom
Tags were: fixed woody
Tags removed: fixed
>
End of message, stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, D
Your message dated Wed, 27 Aug 2003 21:12:12 -0500
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#207539: Bug report
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibil
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> retitle 207537 xserver-xfree86: want way to override configured debconf values with
> autodetected ones
Bug#207537: xserver-xfree86: autodetection is not used
Changed Bug title.
> severity 207537 wishlist
Bug#207537: xserver-xfree86: want way to overr
I have bad news regarding this bug.
LaMont and I have worked on this (LaMont did the hard part; I just
diagnosed the failures), and determined that it is not possible to
straightforwardly binary-NMU xfree86 4.2.1-6 to fix this problem on
HPPA.
The reason is that at the time 4.2.1-6 was released,
Author: branden
Date: 2003-08-27 21:31:07 -0500 (Wed, 27 Aug 2003)
New Revision: 450
Modified:
trunk/debian/changelog
Log:
debian/changelog: add more justification for release urgency
Modified: trunk/debian/changelog
===
--- trun
retitle 207537 xserver-xfree86: want way to override configured debconf values with
autodetected ones
severity 207537 wishlist
thanks
On Wed, Aug 27, 2003 at 08:37:08PM +0200, Goswin Brederlow wrote:
> despite what you told me on irc before ignoring me none of the
> autodetection works. The reaso
Package: xserver-xfree86
Version: 4.2.1-10
Aside from all the 4.2.1-10 nonsense with the XF86Config-4 changes (ugg,
what a pain) now I'm getting this:
Fatal server error:
Cannot open log file "/var/log/XFree86.0.log"
When reporting blah blah blah
Yes, I've tried 'touch'
/var is not full
the fi
On Wed, Aug 27, 2003 at 08:13:45PM +0200, Eduard Bloch wrote:
> if /proc mounted:
> if /proc/fb exists:
> if(driver-listed-there matches choosen video card):
> preset use_fbdev to true
> preset priority to low
> else
> preset use_fbdev to false
> preset priority to
Title: u9KZIx7i
without any Debian-x VKo and when it oJgVA
CCgw I wish E Debian-x ok deal wubOR
#include
* Branden Robinson [Wed, Aug 27 2003, 06:26:02PM]:
> > Option "SWcursor" is only needed in a minority of cases as well (and
> > then it's a driver bug which should simply be fixed), but you even want
Of course it is a driver but, but not giving it a chance to appear is
IMO a better way
retitle 207575 xserver-xfree86: X server cannot open log file
tag 207575 + moreinfo
thanks
On Wed, Aug 27, 2003 at 06:10:03PM -0700, Greg Hazel wrote:
> Fatal server error:
> Cannot open log file "/var/log/XFree86.0.log"
Please file a bug report including the information asked for in the
XF86Conf
Package: xlibmesa-drm-src
Version: 4.3.0-0pre1v1
Severity: normal
Tags: patch
Small typo in debian/rules. Apply the following patch.
--- modules/xlibmesa-drm/debian/rules~ 2003-07-31 17:24:21.0 +0900
+++ modules/xlibmesa-drm/debian/rules 2003-08-26 18:25:51.0 +0900
@@ -45,7
On Wed, Aug 27, 2003 at 07:34:55AM +0200, Sven Luther wrote:
> This don't bring us much, it is hanging in glint_wait, which is a macro
> waiting for space in the fifo, and since the space never comes, it
> waits forever. Same diagnostic as before. The pipeline is deadlocked,
> but i don't know why.
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> tag 199715 - fixed
Bug#199715: [xdm]: 4.1.x makes ia64 go boom
Tags were: fixed woody
Tags removed: fixed
>
End of message, stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, D
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> retitle 185936 xlibs-pic: licq FTBFSes if it can't lay its dirty hands on a static
> PIC version of libXss
Bug#185936: licq_1.2.4-1(hppa/unstable): FTBFS: non-PIC in shared lib
Changed Bug title.
>
End of message, stopping processing here.
Please con
On Thu, Aug 28, 2003 at 12:09:22AM +0200, Michel Dänzer wrote:
> So we now decide for our users what they (don't) need or (don't) want?
>
> Option "SWcursor" is only needed in a minority of cases as well (and
> then it's a driver bug which should simply be fixed), but you even want
> to make it th
tag 207268 + pending
thanks
On Tue, Aug 26, 2003 at 12:15:36PM -0500, Branden Robinson wrote:
> Hmm. Purging and reinstalling should definitely put the files in
> question under automatic management, if they do not already exist.
>
> I'll check into it. Thanks for your report.
This has been fi
70 matches
Mail list logo
