Your message dated Sun, 21 Sep 2003 23:26:54 -0500
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#10445:
http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=10445
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If thi
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> tag 198910 + fixed-upstream
Bug#198910: xterm(1) confuses ampersand and @ symbol
There were no tags set.
Tags added: fixed-upstream
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system administrator
On Fri, Sep 19, 2003 at 01:36:38PM -0500, X Strike Force SVN Admin wrote:
> Author: wt
> Date: 2003-09-19 13:36:17 -0500 (Fri, 19 Sep 2003)
> New Revision: 555
>
> Added:
>branches/4.3.0/sid/debian/patches/017_x11_pkg_config_enable.diff
> Removed:
>branches/4.3.0/sid/debian/patches/017_fix
On Mon, Sep 22, 2003 at 12:26:52PM +1000, Daniel Stone wrote:
> On Sun, Sep 21, 2003 at 09:15:34PM -0500, Warren Turkal wrote:
> > Is there a sorting order to the MANIFESTS, or can I just add whatever
> > whereever? I am going to make the changes for the other archs for the
> > pkg-config stuff.
>
Author: wt
Date: 2003-09-21 22:02:17 -0500 (Sun, 21 Sep 2003)
New Revision: 565
Modified:
branches/4.3.0/sid/debian/MANIFEST.alpha
branches/4.3.0/sid/debian/MANIFEST.arm
branches/4.3.0/sid/debian/MANIFEST.hppa
branches/4.3.0/sid/debian/MANIFEST.hurd-i386
branches/4.3.0/sid/debian/MA
Your message dated Sun, 21 Sep 2003 23:26:54 -0500
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#10445: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=10445
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> tag 198910 + fixed-upstream
Bug#198910: xterm(1) confuses ampersand and @ symbol
There were no tags set.
Tags added: fixed-upstream
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system administrator
Is there any reason that I should not submit the patches for building
external Xcursor, Xft, and Xrender upstream?
wt
--
Warren Turkal
President, GOLUM, Inc.
http://www.golum.org
On Fri, Sep 19, 2003 at 01:36:38PM -0500, X Strike Force SVN Admin wrote:
> Author: wt
> Date: 2003-09-19 13:36:17 -0500 (Fri, 19 Sep 2003)
> New Revision: 555
>
> Added:
>branches/4.3.0/sid/debian/patches/017_x11_pkg_config_enable.diff
> Removed:
>branches/4.3.0/sid/debian/patches/017_fix
On Mon, Sep 22, 2003 at 12:26:52PM +1000, Daniel Stone wrote:
> On Sun, Sep 21, 2003 at 09:15:34PM -0500, Warren Turkal wrote:
> > Is there a sorting order to the MANIFESTS, or can I just add whatever
> > whereever? I am going to make the changes for the other archs for the
> > pkg-config stuff.
>
On Sun, Sep 21, 2003 at 09:15:34PM -0500, Warren Turkal wrote:
> Is there a sorting order to the MANIFESTS, or can I just add whatever
> whereever? I am going to make the changes for the other archs for the
> pkg-config stuff.
LANG=C sort
--
Daniel Stone
Michel Dänzer wrote:
> So do I about the technical change per se, my concern is to avoid
> gratuitous deviation from upstream.
It is not gratuitous...it's one file. If using pkg-config to locate xlibs
becomes more prevalent, hopefully upstream will be more friendly toward the
change there.
Warren
Is there a sorting order to the MANIFESTS, or can I just add whatever
whereever? I am going to make the changes for the other archs for the
pkg-config stuff.
wt
--
Warren Turkal
President, GOLUM, Inc.
http://www.golum.org
Author: wt
Date: 2003-09-21 22:02:17 -0500 (Sun, 21 Sep 2003)
New Revision: 565
Modified:
branches/4.3.0/sid/debian/MANIFEST.alpha
branches/4.3.0/sid/debian/MANIFEST.arm
branches/4.3.0/sid/debian/MANIFEST.hppa
branches/4.3.0/sid/debian/MANIFEST.hurd-i386
branches/4.3.0/sid/debian/MA
Is there any reason that I should not submit the patches for building
external Xcursor, Xft, and Xrender upstream?
wt
--
Warren Turkal
President, GOLUM, Inc.
http://www.golum.org
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Sun, Sep 21, 2003 at 09:15:34PM -0500, Warren Turkal wrote:
> Is there a sorting order to the MANIFESTS, or can I just add whatever
> whereever? I am going to make the changes for the other archs for the
> pkg-config stuff.
LANG=C sort
--
Daniel Stone
Michel Dänzer wrote:
> So do I about the technical change per se, my concern is to avoid
> gratuitous deviation from upstream.
It is not gratuitous...it's one file. If using pkg-config to locate xlibs
becomes more prevalent, hopefully upstream will be more friendly toward the
change there.
Warren
Is there a sorting order to the MANIFESTS, or can I just add whatever
whereever? I am going to make the changes for the other archs for the
pkg-config stuff.
wt
--
Warren Turkal
President, GOLUM, Inc.
http://www.golum.org
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubsc
Branden Robinson wrote:
On Sun, Sep 21, 2003 at 10:47:57AM +0200, Egbert Eich wrote:
No, I removed it again. O_SYNC causes the memory to be mapped
uncached. I had a system which crashed horribly when this flag
was not set for MMIO. Now I believe the system itself was faulty.
I'm still not sure
Author: branden
Date: 2003-09-21 16:15:47 -0500 (Sun, 21 Sep 2003)
New Revision: 563
Modified:
branches/4.3.0/sid/debian/changelog
branches/4.3.0/sid/debian/patches/021_riscpc_ioport_fix.diff
Log:
Resync patch #021 with #000_stolen_from_HEAD_int10.diff and improve
error reporting when iope
Branden Robinson wrote:
On Sun, Sep 21, 2003 at 10:47:57AM +0200, Egbert Eich wrote:
No, I removed it again. O_SYNC causes the memory to be mapped
uncached. I had a system which crashed horribly when this flag
was not set for MMIO. Now I believe the system itself was faulty.
I'm still not sure if
On Sun, 2003-09-21 at 19:59, Branden Robinson wrote:
>
> Michel, does that explanation satisfy you? I find myself pretty neutral
> about this change.
So do I about the technical change per se, my concern is to avoid
gratuitous deviation from upstream.
--
Earthling Michel Dänzer \ Debian (p
Author: branden
Date: 2003-09-21 16:15:47 -0500 (Sun, 21 Sep 2003)
New Revision: 563
Modified:
branches/4.3.0/sid/debian/changelog
branches/4.3.0/sid/debian/patches/021_riscpc_ioport_fix.diff
Log:
Resync patch #021 with #000_stolen_from_HEAD_int10.diff and improve
error reporting when iope
Author: branden
Date: 2003-09-21 14:12:02 -0500 (Sun, 21 Sep 2003)
New Revision: 562
Added:
branches/4.1.0/woody-proposed-updates/
Removed:
branches/4.1.0/sarge/
Log:
Rename the 4.1.0/sarge branch to 4.1.0/woody-proposed-updates, since that
is its new purpose.
Copied: branches/4.1.0/woody-
On Sun, Sep 21, 2003 at 10:47:57AM +0200, Egbert Eich wrote:
> No, I removed it again. O_SYNC causes the memory to be mapped
> uncached. I had a system which crashed horribly when this flag
> was not set for MMIO. Now I believe the system itself was faulty.
> I'm still not sure if caching should be
Author: branden
Date: 2003-09-21 14:05:25 -0500 (Sun, 21 Sep 2003)
New Revision: 561
Modified:
branches/4.3.0/sid/debian/changelog
branches/4.3.0/sid/debian/patches/000_stolen_from_HEAD_int10.diff
Log:
Update xc/programs/Xserver/hw/xfree86/os-support/linux/lnx_video.c to
latest version fro
Author: branden
Date: 2003-09-21 13:28:55 -0500 (Sun, 21 Sep 2003)
New Revision: 560
Modified:
branches/4.3.0/sid/debian/changelog
branches/4.3.0/sid/debian/control
Log:
The XKB implementation in XFree86 4.3.0 has changed in a
non-backward-compatible manner; update package relationships acco
Author: branden
Date: 2003-09-21 13:20:05 -0500 (Sun, 21 Sep 2003)
New Revision: 559
Modified:
branches/4.3.0/sid/debian/changelog
Log:
debian/changelog: fix ISHIKAWA-san's changelog entry
Modified: branches/4.3.0/sid/debian/changelog
==
> Debian Bug report logs - [1]#10445
> xterm: using -e with -ls fails to open a login shell
This should be closed since the documentation fixes requested were made.
--
Thomas E. Dickey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
http://invisible-island.net
ftp://invisible-island.net
> Debian Bug report logs - [1]#198910
> xterm(1) confuses ampersand and @ symbol
I just committed a fix for this in XFree86 CVS.
--
Thomas E. Dickey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
http://invisible-island.net
ftp://invisible-island.net
On Sun, 2003-09-21 at 19:59, Branden Robinson wrote:
>
> Michel, does that explanation satisfy you? I find myself pretty neutral
> about this change.
So do I about the technical change per se, my concern is to avoid
gratuitous deviation from upstream.
--
Earthling Michel Dänzer \ Debian (p
On Sun, Sep 21, 2003 at 02:24:33AM -0700, Joshua Kwan wrote:
> In the middle of an uneventful X session where I was simply typing some
> stuff up in vim, it aborts on signal 11 and flings me back into the
> console. As per the crash advice, I've attached the XFree86.0.log,
> although it doesn't see
On Sun, Sep 21, 2003 at 06:13:00AM -0500, Warren Turkal wrote:
> Branden Robinson wrote:
> > Warren, please expand on your rationale for this change.
> >
>
> The 017 that was in the svn was not useful to any architecture and was
> baggage from prior X versions AFAICT since there is already a "dep
Author: branden
Date: 2003-09-21 14:12:02 -0500 (Sun, 21 Sep 2003)
New Revision: 562
Added:
branches/4.1.0/woody-proposed-updates/
Removed:
branches/4.1.0/sarge/
Log:
Rename the 4.1.0/sarge branch to 4.1.0/woody-proposed-updates, since that
is its new purpose.
Copied: branches/4.1.0/woody-
Author: branden
Date: 2003-09-21 12:21:55 -0500 (Sun, 21 Sep 2003)
New Revision: 558
Modified:
trunk/debian/changelog
trunk/debian/control
Log:
Kill off libxaw-dev virtual package per discussion on debian-devel mailing
list.
- debian/control:
+ libxaw6-dev now conflicts with and replaces l
[Followups set.]
On Thu, Sep 18, 2003 at 09:00:03PM -0500, Craig P. Steffen wrote:
> I am prospective DD; as one of my opening packages, I intend to adopt the
> sound file editor xwave. One of the bugs against it, 170005, says that
> depending on the virtual package "libxaw-dev" is wrong.
>
On Sun, Sep 21, 2003 at 10:47:57AM +0200, Egbert Eich wrote:
> No, I removed it again. O_SYNC causes the memory to be mapped
> uncached. I had a system which crashed horribly when this flag
> was not set for MMIO. Now I believe the system itself was faulty.
> I'm still not sure if caching should be
Author: branden
Date: 2003-09-21 14:05:25 -0500 (Sun, 21 Sep 2003)
New Revision: 561
Modified:
branches/4.3.0/sid/debian/changelog
branches/4.3.0/sid/debian/patches/000_stolen_from_HEAD_int10.diff
Log:
Update xc/programs/Xserver/hw/xfree86/os-support/linux/lnx_video.c to
latest version fro
Thomas Winischhofer writes:
>
> Egbert, Debian folks:
>
> After the release of XFree86 4.3.0, (AFAIK) Egbert Eich commited a patch
> which set the O_SYNC flag when opening /dev/mem for framebuffer memory
> access.
>
> This caused memory access to the framebuffer area to become terribly
Author: branden
Date: 2003-09-21 13:28:55 -0500 (Sun, 21 Sep 2003)
New Revision: 560
Modified:
branches/4.3.0/sid/debian/changelog
branches/4.3.0/sid/debian/control
Log:
The XKB implementation in XFree86 4.3.0 has changed in a
non-backward-compatible manner; update package relationships acco
Author: branden
Date: 2003-09-21 13:20:05 -0500 (Sun, 21 Sep 2003)
New Revision: 559
Modified:
branches/4.3.0/sid/debian/changelog
Log:
debian/changelog: fix ISHIKAWA-san's changelog entry
Modified: branches/4.3.0/sid/debian/changelog
==
> Debian Bug report logs - [1]#10445
> xterm: using -e with -ls fails to open a login shell
This should be closed since the documentation fixes requested were made.
--
Thomas E. Dickey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
http://invisible-island.net
ftp://invisible-island.net
-
> Debian Bug report logs - [1]#198910
> xterm(1) confuses ampersand and @ symbol
I just committed a fix for this in XFree86 CVS.
--
Thomas E. Dickey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
http://invisible-island.net
ftp://invisible-island.net
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [E
On Sun, Sep 21, 2003 at 02:24:33AM -0700, Joshua Kwan wrote:
> In the middle of an uneventful X session where I was simply typing some
> stuff up in vim, it aborts on signal 11 and flings me back into the
> console. As per the crash advice, I've attached the XFree86.0.log,
> although it doesn't see
On Sun, Sep 21, 2003 at 06:13:00AM -0500, Warren Turkal wrote:
> Branden Robinson wrote:
> > Warren, please expand on your rationale for this change.
> >
>
> The 017 that was in the svn was not useful to any architecture and was
> baggage from prior X versions AFAICT since there is already a "dep
Title: IFYgF dJ
Huffington blasts The thing is in 1970
Eye on how much tTe Congress to dLan fxApzYm in 1911 Can you tell me?
You are on... in 2005 in 1815 And if you in 1844
Author: branden
Date: 2003-09-21 12:21:55 -0500 (Sun, 21 Sep 2003)
New Revision: 558
Modified:
trunk/debian/changelog
trunk/debian/control
Log:
Kill off libxaw-dev virtual package per discussion on debian-devel mailing
list.
- debian/control:
+ libxaw6-dev now conflicts with and replaces l
[Followups set.]
On Thu, Sep 18, 2003 at 09:00:03PM -0500, Craig P. Steffen wrote:
> I am prospective DD; as one of my opening packages, I intend to adopt the
> sound file editor xwave. One of the bugs against it, 170005, says that
> depending on the virtual package "libxaw-dev" is wrong.
>
Thomas Winischhofer writes:
>
> Egbert, Debian folks:
>
> After the release of XFree86 4.3.0, (AFAIK) Egbert Eich commited a patch
> which set the O_SYNC flag when opening /dev/mem for framebuffer memory
> access.
>
> This caused memory access to the framebuffer area to become terribly
Title: IFYgF dJ
Huffington blasts The thing is in 1970
Eye on how much tTe Congress to dLan fxApzYm in 1911 Can you tell me?
You are on... in 2005 in 1815 And if you in 1844
Branden Robinson wrote:
> On Sat, Sep 20, 2003 at 02:17:40PM +0200, Michel Dänzer wrote:
>> On Fri, 2003-09-19 at 20:36, X Strike Force SVN Admin wrote:
>> >
>> > Log:
>> > Enabling pkg-config for libX11. The main artifact is that
>> > there is now a file called /usr/lib/pkgconfig/X11.pc.
>>
>>
Branden Robinson wrote:
> On Fri, Sep 19, 2003 at 01:36:38PM -0500, X Strike Force SVN Admin wrote:
>> Author: wt
>> Date: 2003-09-19 13:36:17 -0500 (Fri, 19 Sep 2003)
>> New Revision: 555
>>
>> Added:
>>branches/4.3.0/sid/debian/patches/017_x11_pkg_config_enable.diff
>> Removed:
>>branch
In the middle of an uneventful X session where I was simply typing some
stuff up in vim, it aborts on signal 11 and flings me back into the
console. As per the crash advice, I've attached the XFree86.0.log,
although it doesn't seem to show anything useful in my eyes hopefully it
can help the X Stri
Branden Robinson wrote:
> On Sat, Sep 20, 2003 at 02:17:40PM +0200, Michel Dänzer wrote:
>> On Fri, 2003-09-19 at 20:36, X Strike Force SVN Admin wrote:
>> >
>> > Log:
>> > Enabling pkg-config for libX11. The main artifact is that
>> > there is now a file called /usr/lib/pkgconfig/X11.pc.
>>
>>
Branden Robinson wrote:
> On Fri, Sep 19, 2003 at 01:36:38PM -0500, X Strike Force SVN Admin wrote:
>> Author: wt
>> Date: 2003-09-19 13:36:17 -0500 (Fri, 19 Sep 2003)
>> New Revision: 555
>>
>> Added:
>>branches/4.3.0/sid/debian/patches/017_x11_pkg_config_enable.diff
>> Removed:
>>branch
In the middle of an uneventful X session where I was simply typing some
stuff up in vim, it aborts on signal 11 and flings me back into the
console. As per the crash advice, I've attached the XFree86.0.log,
although it doesn't seem to show anything useful in my eyes hopefully it
can help the X Stri
At Sun, 21 Sep 2003 10:44:08 +0900 (JST),
Tomohiro KUBOTA wrote:
> Package: xfree86
> Version: 4.2.1-11
> Severity: wishlist
>
> Here is an updated Japanese translation of po-debconf file.
> The file should go to debian/po directory of the xfree86 source
> package.
Hmm, I've already sent new ja.p
At Sun, 21 Sep 2003 10:44:08 +0900 (JST),
Tomohiro KUBOTA wrote:
> Package: xfree86
> Version: 4.2.1-11
> Severity: wishlist
>
> Here is an updated Japanese translation of po-debconf file.
> The file should go to debian/po directory of the xfree86 source
> package.
Hmm, I've already sent new ja.p
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
60 matches
Mail list logo
