X Strike Force XFree86 SVN commit: r1422 - trunk/debian

2004-05-20 Thread X Strike Force SVN Repository Admin
Author: branden Date: 2004-05-20 23:58:06 -0500 (Thu, 20 May 2004) New Revision: 1422 Modified: trunk/debian/TODO Log: Add item. Modified: trunk/debian/TODO === --- trunk/debian/TODO 2004-05-20 19:17:40 UTC (rev 1421) +++ trunk

Re: problem with left-handed mouse on X - is GPM to blame or is it X?

2004-05-20 Thread Branden Robinson
On Mon, May 10, 2004 at 07:28:57PM -0400, Zephaniah E. Hull wrote: > Please see the last message, where I covered just this. > > Raw mode repeats byte for byte, it does not attempt to do ANYTHING to > them. > > In addition, he is repeating a PS2 protocol, with all the problems > involved in that.

Re: Potential future licensing issues with X.org (code merged from XFree86)

2004-05-20 Thread Daniel Stone
On Thu, May 20, 2004 at 04:12:47PM -0400, Nathanael Nerode wrote: > Does it seem reasonable to worry about > * the code from post-2-12-2004 commits which appears to be actually > contributed by David Dawes, excluding that which is not of significant > length > * the code from the 'X-Oz' commit >

Bug#237509: libxft-dev_2.1.2-6_i386 Still Doesn't Install

2004-05-20 Thread Chris Horn
Package: libxft-dev Version: 2.1.2-5 Severity: normal Followup-For: Bug #237509 The diversion is *still* broken. Preparing to replace libxft-dev 2.1.2-5 (using .../libxft-dev_2.1.2-6_i386.deb) ... diversion of /usr/X11R6/include/X11/Xft/Xft.h to /usr/X11R6/include/X11/Xft/Xft1.h by libxft-dev R

Re: Potential future licensing issues with X.org (code merged from XFree86)

2004-05-20 Thread Nathanael Nerode
Daniel Stone wrote: On Mon, May 17, 2004 at 06:25:42PM -0400, Nathanael Nerode wrote: Daniel Stone wrote: Replying from my PDA is hard, so I'll just briefly say that I have one hundred per cent confidence in the tree as it stands, Um, in the X.org tree, you mean? (Or in the Debian tree, in

Bug#240656: xserver-xfree86: 5 second lock when switching from console to X with XFree 4.3

2004-05-20 Thread Branden Robinson
On Wed, Apr 28, 2004 at 09:54:00PM +0200, Marco Herrn wrote: > > > > > 1) Report your gpm configuration by mailing your /etc/gpm.conf (I > > > > > think > > > > > that's what it's called -- I don't have it installed) to this bug. > > It is attached to this mail. > This is the already new version!

Bug#229850: xserver-xfree86: Nokia 446Xpro properly detected but sync incorrect

2004-05-20 Thread Branden Robinson
On Mon, May 10, 2004 at 05:05:09PM -0400, Jay Berkenbilt wrote: > >> I'll be reinstalling some machines from scratch over the next week or >> so to test beta4 of debian-installer. I'll definitely give it a look. > >Anything to report on this front? > > I posted my comments already t

Bug#240656: xserver-xfree86: 5 second lock when switching from console to X with XFree 4.3

2004-05-20 Thread Branden Robinson
On Wed, Apr 28, 2004 at 08:39:03PM +0200, Chipzz wrote: > On Wed, 28 Apr 2004, Branden Robinson wrote: > > > device=/dev/psaux > > > responsiveness= > > > repeat_type=raw > ^^^ > > > type=imps2 > > > append="" > > > sample_rate= > > > > I see you're repeating as "imps2". The follow

Processed: retitle 233001 to xserver-xfree86: [tseng] server says 'No devices detected.' on ET4000/W32p rev C rev 0

2004-05-20 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.7.95.1 > retitle 233001 xserver-xfree86: [tseng] server says 'No devices detected.' on > ET4000/W32p rev C rev 0 Bug#233001: xserver-xfree86: [tseng] ET4000/W32p only works with vesa or vga

Re: Getting ready for xfree86 4.3.0.dfsg.1-2 (ATI and SIS users WAKE UP!)

2004-05-20 Thread Branden Robinson
On Tue, May 18, 2004 at 08:26:14AM +0200, Fabio Massimo Di Nitto wrote: > Hi guys, > let's take a look of where we are now compared to the original > plan. [snip completed items] > the only two items left are: > > > * Fix upstream install rule that prevents Xcursor themes from being > >

Re: X Strike Force XFree86 SVN commit: r1320 - in people/fabbione/trunk/debian: . patches

2004-05-20 Thread Branden Robinson
On Thu, May 13, 2004 at 07:18:56AM +0200, Fabio Massimo Di Nitto wrote: > On Mon, 10 May 2004, Branden Robinson wrote: > > > > Any other good suggestion? > > > > I think the Imakefiles should be fixed so that bdftruncate and ucs2any > > are decoupled from the building of the fonts themselves. I c

Bug#249614: X config on SGI Indy

2004-05-20 Thread Guido Guenther
On Tue, May 18, 2004 at 04:06:31PM +0100, Martin Michlmayr wrote: > Does it hurt to have that option on the Indy as well, or should does > be done only on Indigo2? Nope, this should be set for the I2 only. > Also, can you paste a complete /etc/X11/XF86Config-4 configuration > file for reference.

X Strike Force XFree86 SVN commit: r1421 - in trunk/debian: . patches

2004-05-20 Thread X Strike Force SVN Repository Admin
Author: branden Date: 2004-05-20 14:17:40 -0500 (Thu, 20 May 2004) New Revision: 1421 Modified: trunk/debian/CHANGESETS trunk/debian/patches/030_Xserver_and_driver_region_primitive_fixups.diff Log: (cosmetic) Fix typo in patch annotation. Modified: trunk/debian/CHANGESETS =

Bug#250061: xlibmesa-glu: Missing Depends: debconf

2004-05-20 Thread LaMont Jones
Package: xlibmesa-glu Version: 4.3.0.dfsg.1-1 Severity: serious Need to Depend: debconf. > Unpacking replacement xlibmesa-glu ... > /var/lib/dpkg/info/xlibmesa-glu.postrm: line 11: > /usr/share/debconf/confmodule: No such file or directory -- System Information Debian Release: testing/unstable

Bug#249025: xterm: crashes when X-resource XTerm*openIm set to false

2004-05-20 Thread Thomas Dickey
On Thu, May 20, 2004 at 12:00:30PM +0200, Michael Gernoth wrote: > On Sat, May 15, 2004 at 07:40:41AM -0400, Thomas Dickey wrote: > > On Fri, May 14, 2004 at 04:50:05PM +0200, Michael Gernoth wrote: > > > Package: xterm > > > Version: 4.3.0.dfsg.1-1 > > > Severity: normal > > > > > > When the X-Re

Bug#249025: xterm: crashes when X-resource XTerm*openIm set to false

2004-05-20 Thread Michael Gernoth
On Sat, May 15, 2004 at 07:40:41AM -0400, Thomas Dickey wrote: > On Fri, May 14, 2004 at 04:50:05PM +0200, Michael Gernoth wrote: > > Package: xterm > > Version: 4.3.0.dfsg.1-1 > > Severity: normal > > > > When the X-Resource XTerm*openIm ist set to false, starting xterm > > results in a long time

We are closing

2004-05-20 Thread Gregorio Montoya
Due to new regulations Canadian Generics is closing soon We now have close-out prices! Get something while you still can! XANA2X VAL)IUM Cia1lis VIAG7RA http://amznzera.com/gp/default.asp?id=gm03 constrict conscience turtleneck iiistateroom prognosis frizzle reeve adobe http://amznzera.com/host/

Bug#249980: xserver-xfree86: [mouse] with a ps/2 socket but a serial mouse plugged in, autodetect fails

2004-05-20 Thread Luke Kenneth Casson Leighton
Package: xserver-xfree86 Version: 4.2.1-16 Severity: normal branden, hi, i am not sure if this is to do with xserver itself but i just downloaded morphix onto a CD in the hope that the same issues i am having would be fixed, there, and they are not. the issue is that auto-detection of the mouse

X Strike Force XFree86 SVN commit: r1420 - /

2004-05-20 Thread X Strike Force SVN Repository Admin
Author: branden Date: 2004-05-20 03:17:37 -0500 (Thu, 20 May 2004) New Revision: 1420 Modified: NEWS.xhtml Log: Add item announcing unplanned downtime and warning of Subversion security flaw. Modified: NEWS.xhtml === --- NEWS.xht

Processed: reopening accidentally closed report

2004-05-20 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > reopen 237583 Bug#237583: xlibs: [XKB] us keymap, bar/backslash symbol doesn't work as it's supposed to Bug reopened, originator not changed. > #sorry for the typo > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian b

Bug#237583: marked as done (xlibs: [XKB] us keymap, bar/backslash symbol doesn't work as it's supposed to)

2004-05-20 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Thu, 20 May 2004 03:17:05 -0400 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#237583: fixed in cdrtools 4:2.0+a30.pre1-1 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it