Your message dated Mon, 5 Jul 2004 07:29:35 +0200 (CEST)
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Bug#257465: more info
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your
On Sat, 2004-07-03 at 22:43 +0200, Sven Luther wrote:
I would suggest a solution as follows :
1) the XF86Config file is debconf managed : We query the database, inform
the user with a low priority debconf question if it is set to psaux,
and change it for him. This means a priority
On Mon, Jul 05, 2004 at 12:19:19PM +0200, Michel Dänzer wrote:
On Sat, 2004-07-03 at 22:43 +0200, Sven Luther wrote:
I would suggest a solution as follows :
1) the XF86Config file is debconf managed : We query the database, inform
the user with a low priority debconf question if
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
severity 257294 serious
Bug#257294: desktop switcher stays visible
Severity set to `serious'.
reassign 257294 xlibs
Bug#257294: desktop switcher stays visible
Bug reassigned from package `openbox' to `xlibs'.
merge 257294 254973
Bug#254973:
Package: xfree86
Severity: wishlist
If the xc-xserver-xfree86/ build failes (e.g. because of lack of
diskspace) and one runs debian/rules build again, it seems large parts
(all of?) xc/ get rebuilt as well. It would be nice if this could be
prevented by two new debian/rules targets (like
Package: xserver-xfree86
Version: 4.3.0.dfsg.1-4
Severity: normal
XFree86 unset LD_LIBRARY_PATH variable, so in X is blank. I also tried
to start X with xinit command but with same result. After return from X
variable is set right.
LD_LIBRARY_PATH is needed by java to point to directory
On Fri, Jul 02, 2004 at 01:44:28AM +1000, Daniel Stone wrote:
On Thu, Jul 01, 2004 at 01:26:59PM +0200, Fabio Massimo Di Nitto wrote:
On Wed, 30 Jun 2004, Jonas Meurer wrote:
maybe most recent suggestions about the future of X in debian should
involve a discussion about the policy for X
On Thu, Jul 01, 2004 at 01:26:59PM +0200, Fabio Massimo Di Nitto wrote:
Having only five or six people with SVN commit access does not mean that
others cannot contribute.
Actually the real figure is twice that.
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ grep xhackers /etc/group
On Thu, Jul 01, 2004 at 01:35:30PM +1000, Daniel Stone wrote:
Yes, I indicated my extreme discomfort with the current XSF order. The
current XSF order, however, is not necessarily something which need be
set in stone, no?
No. Did you have any reforms in mind beyond give Daniel Stone as much
Package: xprt
Version: 4.3.0.dfsg.1-5
Severity: important
On startup, xprt immediately exits because it can't find the fixed
font. Nevertheless, the font is there:
$ xlsfonts |grep '^fixed'
fixed
And xterm -fn fixed works fine w/o error.
Here's the xprt log:
Jul 5 22:56:24 tytlal
10 matches
Mail list logo
