On Tue, Aug 03, 2004 at 12:11:39AM -0400, John D. Hendrickson wrote:
> I do not appreciate being called completely bogues.
I said the bug was completely bogus, not you.
--
Daniel Stone<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Debian: the universal operating system
Hi,
I've replied to this message to say I am not satisfied with the closure.
I do not appreciate being called completely bogues.
I beleive my research in the origional message and the follow-up stands
as that which cannot be disproved. I spent time researhing what I wrote.
The same effect ha
Author: branden
Date: 2004-08-02 22:34:12 -0500 (Mon, 02 Aug 2004)
New Revision: 1712
Modified:
trunk/debian/CHANGESETS
trunk/debian/changelog
trunk/debian/patches/911_debian_XF86Config_to_XF86Config-4.diff
Log:
Update manpage cross-references to refer to XF86Config-4(5x) instead of
XF86C
Author: branden
Date: 2004-08-02 22:30:11 -0500 (Mon, 02 Aug 2004)
New Revision: 1711
Added:
trunk/debian/patches/099e_XF86Config_manpage_overhaul.diff
Modified:
trunk/debian/CHANGESETS
trunk/debian/TODO
trunk/debian/changelog
Log:
Perform major stylistic fixes to the XF86Config-4(5x)
Package: xfonts-75dpi
Version: 4.1.0-16
Severity: important
-- System Information
Debian Release: 3.0
Architecture: i386
Kernel: Linux link 2.4.20-mm #1 Tue Feb 24 17:47:00 EST 2004 i586
Locale: LANG=C, LC_CTYPE=C
Versions of packages xfonts-75dpi depends on:
ii xutils4
severity 229850 important
thanks
Hello again. As a reminder, the point of this bug is that the
xserver-xfree86 config script uses get-edid to determine the monitor's
horizontal sync and vertical refresh rates, and then discards the
information. The fix I'm suggesting is fairly obvious and simple
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> severity 229850 important
Bug#229850: xserver-xfree86: [debconf] monitor selection methods need to be
more careful about clobbering autodetected monitor sync ranges
Severity set to `important'.
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if
User ID: 9 song
Date: Mon, 02 Aug 2004 18:33:41 -0600
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative;
boundary="--869095174982271490"
869095174982271490
Content-Type: text/plain;
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit
Debian-x
Why pay more when you can enjoy the best and cheapest pi
Package: xserver-xfree86
Version: 4.3.0.dfsg.1-6
Severity: normal
Restarting X following a recent upgrade, I found that my Super (i.e. Win)
keys no longer work as before: According to Emacs, keys pressed with
them are now both Super- and Hyper-modified, instead of just Super.
Since all of my wind
Package: xserver-xfree86
Version: 4.3.0.dfsg.1-6
Severity: normal
installing or reinstalling xserver-xfree86 render errors:
start_configlet: configlet in path /usr/share/configlets/localeconf is
bad
start_configlet: configlet in path /usr/share/configlets/xserver-common
is bad
this seems fixed i
Please stop send me spamming e-mails. If You can't filter or can not
stop spammers which user Your server I think it's good idea to change Your
Administrator!!!
Thanx!!!
Намалете разходите за телефонни разговори в
страната и чужбина - www.bitextel.com
On Tue, Aug 03, 2004 at 02:01:03AM +1000, Daniel Stone wrote:
> As we're coming up to a release and thus need to close this issue
> quickly, could -legal please comment on this issue for completeness? I
> would really like comments from the peanut gallery, the cheap seats, the
> people who aren't l
On Wed, Jul 21, 2004 at 09:46:24PM -0500, Branden Robinson wrote:
> On Mon, Jul 19, 2004 at 04:31:35PM +0100, Jon Dowland wrote:
> > Perhaps the Xserver could provide some kind of alert when an invalid
> > keyboard/keymap is selected;
>
> It generally does; both to its logfile in /var/log and to s
On Tue, Aug 03, 2004 at 02:01:03AM +1000, Daniel Stone wrote:
> Hi guys,
> We're trying to release X11R6.7.1 over at X.Org these days, but we've
> hit a little roadbump.
>
> As I'm sure you all know, XFree86 post-4.4RC2 bears a non-DFSG-free
> licence, which makes it impossible for Debian to inclu
On Thu, Jul 29, 2004 at 04:44:35AM -0500, Branden Robinson wrote:
> Dear bug submitter,
>
> I have reports that an upgrade to the xfree86 4.3.0.dfsg.1-6 resolved this
> problem.
>
> Can you confirm this?
I performed the same set of tests as for the previous version and I have come
up with the fo
Daniel Stone writes:
> [3]:
> /*
> * Copyright 2003 by David H. Dawes.
> * Copyright 2003 by X-Oz Technologies.
> * All rights reserved.
> *
> * Permission is hereby granted, free of charge, to any person obtaining a
> * copy of this software and associated documentation files (the "Software
On Mon, Aug 02, 2004 at 07:11:22PM +0200, Sven Luther wrote:
> I believe even the X-Oz licence did experience the addition of this
> problematic clause at some time, so this code could be a pre-change fork or
> something ? Daniel, what is in the COPYRIGHT or such file ? Could you paste
> that here
On Mon, Aug 02, 2004 at 12:54:15PM -0400, Michael Poole wrote:
> Daniel Stone writes:
>
> > [3]:
> > /*
> > * Copyright 2003 by David H. Dawes.
> > * Copyright 2003 by X-Oz Technologies.
> > * All rights reserved.
> > *
> > * Permission is hereby granted, free of charge, to any person obtaini
On Mon, Aug 02, 2004 at 05:50:08PM +0100, Matthew Garrett wrote:
> Daniel Stone <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > However, on the release call today, it was alleged that the code was
> > actually DFSG-free, and that the so-called 'X-Oz licence' bore no legal
> > problems whatsoever, and would be fine
[I am not on -legal; though I will read the archives, please CC.]
Hi guys,
We're trying to release X11R6.7.1 over at X.Org these days, but we've
hit a little roadbump.
As I'm sure you all know, XFree86 post-4.4RC2 bears a non-DFSG-free
licence, which makes it impossible for Debian to include. X.O
Dear Home Bu y e r:
Congratulations! You have been pre -
appr.oved for a new home mortga g e.
Below are the specifications of your approv a l
Lo a n Type: Conventional
Interest Ra t e: 3.5%
Term: 360 months
Sales Price: $250,000 (Maximum)
Down Paym e n t: 10%
Lock-in Period: 45 days
Closing D
Hi,
Did you recieve my email from last week? I'm happy to tell you
that you are app roved for a new home lo an with a 6.78% ra te
Your tracking number is # T4 097 476
You must visit the site below in 24 hrs to confirm your details.
http://homeloanbasics.net/?partid=moffob
Best Regards,
Gretch
Your message could not be delivered.
[EMAIL PROTECTED] - Invalid user name or user not permissioned
Content-type: multipart/related; type="multipart/alternative";
boundary="=_NextPart_000_001B_01C0CA80.6B015D10"
Date: Sun, 26 Jan 2003 10:02:45 +0100
From: debian-x@lists.debian.org
Message-i
23 matches
Mail list logo
