On Thu, 2004-12-16 at 15:17 -0500, Branden Robinson wrote:
>
> What precisely does disabling the "DRI" module in the XF86Config-4
> accomplish that making the DRI modules unavailable by removing the
> xlibmesa-dri package doesn't?
It prevents the X server from initializing and using the DRM and t
Package: xfs
Version: 4.3.0.dfsg.1-9
Severity: normal
Line 24 of /etc/init.d/xfs should read...
if [ -e $SOCKET_DIR -a ! -d $SOCKET_DIR ]; then
and not...
if [ -e $SOCKET_DIR && [ ! -d $SOCKET_DIR ]; then
The latter is clearly missing an ']'.
-- System Information:
Debian Release: 3.1
APT prefe
On Thu, 2004-12-16 at 21:28 +, Anders Karlsson wrote:
> > You might try experimenting with the XAA pixmap options as I just suggested
> > in my mail to Gintautas Miliauskas; see > http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=284448 > for it.
>
> I will give that a shot. I should see in l
tags 236086 + pending
thanks
On Thu, Dec 16, 2004 at 06:23:14PM +0100, Henry Margies wrote:
> Hi,
>
> after upgrading xlibs to version 4.3.0.dfsg.1-9 my keyboard was not
> usable anymore (Q was Tab, Compose was Enter, Find was m). XFree86
> sayed:
>
> syntax error: line 104 of sun/us
> The XKEYB
Actually I did fix the hard part. The remainder is user-preferences which
can be easily set with resources.
In #197, I also added a section to the manpage describing the use of the
clipboard - you should try that (sounds as if your click in the other window
is asserting the primary selection, e.g
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> tags 236086 + pending
Bug#236086: xlibs: sun/type5/us configuration does not possess XFree86 hotkeys
Tags were: patch
Bug#274607: xlibs: problems with XKB settings on a Sun type5/type6 keyboard
Tags added: pending
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Pl
Author: barbier
Date: 2004-12-16 17:39:09 -0500 (Thu, 16 Dec 2004)
New Revision: 2079
Modified:
trunk/debian/CHANGESETS
trunk/debian/changelog
trunk/debian/patches/101b_xkb_sun_loads_srvr_ctrl.diff
Log:
* The loading of srvr_ctrl(xfree86) symbol definitions for Sun keyboards
was bro
Hello Brandon,
Thanks for your late answer.
Am 2004-12-16 15:40:07, schrieb Branden Robinson:
> Note that according to this site, the SiS 330 *is* supported. Perhaps
I have gotten the original manpages from 4.1.0 and I was wondering,
why it was droped in the WOODY version...
> support for it
Package: xserver-xfree86
Version: 4.3.0-2
Severity: important
*** Please type your report below this line ***
While the MGA driver on XF86 4.2.1 works perfectly, it locks up very quickly
in
4.3.0 (running xdm, or opening an xterm and dumping two pages of text are
sufficient). The bug is also p
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> reassign 284610 konqueror
Bug#284610: Bug: Konqueror causes high load from XFree86
Bug reassigned from package `konqueror & xfree86' to `konqueror'.
> --
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system a
On Wed, 2004-12-15 at 15:48 -0500, Branden Robinson wrote:
> On Sun, Dec 12, 2004 at 01:39:35AM +, Anders Karlsson wrote:
> >
> > I had not read that particular entry, but have read it now. I already
> > knew how the X server worked though, about caching pixmaps etc.
>
> Okay -- sorry for the
retitle 282645 xserver-xfree86: [nv] SEGV in NVDmaWait() when using XAA on
NV5M64 [RIVA TNT2 Model 64/Model 64 Pro] rev 21
severity 282645 important
tag 282645 + upstream moreinfo help
thanks
On Tue, Nov 23, 2004 at 04:25:27PM +0100, Joost Kooij wrote:
> Package: xserver-xfree86
> Architecture: i
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> retitle 282645 xserver-xfree86: [nv] SEGV in NVDmaWait() when using XAA on
> NV5M64 [RIVA TNT2 Model 64/Model 64 Pro] rev 21
Bug#282645: xserver-xfree86 nv xaa crash on nvidia tnt2 64
Changed Bug title.
> severity 282645 important
Bug#282645: xserver-
retitle 247821 xserver-xfree86: kdm fails to reset X server after one session
on unknown hardware
tag 247821 + moreinfo unreproducible
thanks
On Mon, Nov 22, 2004 at 05:03:04PM -0800, Debian Bug Tracking System wrote:
> Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
>
> > reassign 247821 xserver-xfr
retitle 282189 xserver-xfree86: [ati/radeon] lockup at server start on RV350 AP
[Radeon 9600]
tag 282189 + moreinfo upstream
thanks
I'm sorry it has taken a while to get back to your report.
On Sat, Nov 20, 2004 at 12:31:23PM +0100, Nils Nordman wrote:
> Package: xserver-xfree86
> Version: 4.3.0
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> retitle 247821 xserver-xfree86: kdm fails to reset X server after one session
> on unknown hardware
Bug#247821: kdm exits after one run
Changed Bug title.
> tag 247821 + moreinfo unreproducible
Bug#247821: xserver-xfree86: kdm fails to reset X server
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> retitle 282189 xserver-xfree86: [ati/radeon] lockup at server start on RV350
> AP [Radeon 9600]
Bug#282189: xserver-xfree86: Locks up computer upon start with Radeon 9600.
Changed Bug title.
> tag 282189 + moreinfo upstream
Bug#282189: xserver-xfree86
[CCing per your request.]
On Mon, Nov 22, 2004 at 03:49:26AM +0100, Michelle Konzack wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I have a Elitegroup mainboard with an On-Board graphic chip Xabre
> SiS 330. Since I have found the manpage sis(5) from 2002 which told
> me, that the xserver-xfree86 v4.1.0 support the Graph
retitle 282080 xserver-xfree86: [i740] corrupt area behind cursor when
acceleration enabled at depths other than 24 on i740 rev 33
tag 282080 + upstream moreinfo
thanks
I am sorry it has taken a while to get to your report; please see below for
some inlined remarks and questions.
On Fri, Nov 19,
On Mon, Dec 13, 2004 at 11:25:29PM +0100, Frederic Lehobey wrote:
> After a few hours of X running, it seems actually that both removing
> the xlibmesa-dri and disabling the DRI in the X server configuration
> prevents the occurence of the lockup (I am still setting memory
> limitation to 128 Mb as
On Fri, Dec 10, 2004 at 10:50:02PM +0100, Olaf Zaplinski wrote:
> Branden Robinson wrote:
> >Hmm...did you perhaps upgrade your kernel?
>
> Yes, but after building my own 2.6.9, everything worked for several days up
> to 'day X'. I can only imagine that cron-apt updated some packages, other
> ch
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> retitle 282080 xserver-xfree86: [i740] corrupt area behind cursor when
> acceleration enabled at depths other than 24 on i740 rev 33
Bug#282080: xserver-xfree86: [i740] X cursor not updated correctly
Changed Bug title.
> tag 282080 + upstream moreinfo
Your message dated Thu, 16 Dec 2004 15:09:33 -0500
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#280971: Processed: reassign 280971 to xserver-xfree86
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not
On Sat, Dec 11, 2004 at 10:17:46PM -0400, Peter Cordes wrote:
> On Thu, Dec 09, 2004 at 01:20:18PM -0800, Debian Bug Tracking System wrote:
> > Changes:
> > xfree86 (4.3.0.dfsg.1-9) unstable; urgency=high
> >Changes by Branden Robinson:
> >* Apply some fixes to the XFree86 X server's ELF
Package: xfree86
Version: 4.3.0.dfsg.1-10
Severity: minor
Restore the Xprint PMF files to upstream .orig tarball, and update
prune-non-free and the copyright file accordingly. It appears they're
free after all.
Severity minor because:
A) Xprt isn't workable in XFree86 4.3.0 anyway (use xprt-xp
Hi,
after upgrading xlibs to version 4.3.0.dfsg.1-9 my keyboard was not
usable anymore (Q was Tab, Compose was Enter, Find was m). XFree86
sayed:
syntax error: line 104 of sun/us
The XKEYBOARD keymap compiler (xkbcomp) reports:
> Error:Error interpreting include file "sun/us"
>
Package: xserver-xfree86
Version: 4.3.0.dfsg.1-9
When I configure X to use the mga driver, X font aliasing looks ugly
(see attached screenshot). The fonts get a colored outline in result of
the antialiasing filter. Looks like there's some problem in the 2d
filtering routine. If I make a switch
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
jjluza wrote:
| Package: xprt
| Version: 4.3.0.dfsg.1-10
| Severity: important
|
|
| Hello,
| I tried to install xfree from incoming. All packages were well installed
| except xprt which fails with this message :
|
| (Lecture de la base de données...
Your message dated Thu, 16 Dec 2004 13:49:32 +0100
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#285907: xprt: Installation fails with dpkg-deb error
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not t
Package: xprt
Version: 4.3.0.dfsg.1-10
Severity: important
Hello,
I tried to install xfree from incoming. All packages were well installed
except xprt which fails with this message :
(Lecture de la base de données... 161561 fichiers et répertoires déjà
installés.)
Préparation du remplacement de
Author: fabbione
Date: 2004-12-16 05:17:37 -0500 (Thu, 16 Dec 2004)
New Revision: 2078
Modified:
trunk/debian/CHANGESETS
trunk/debian/TODO
trunk/debian/changelog
Log:
Merge 4.3.0.dfsg.1-10 release bits and inagurate 4.3.0.dfsg.1-11 development.
Modified: trunk/debian/CHANGESETS
Author: fabbione
Date: 2004-12-16 05:16:11 -0500 (Thu, 16 Dec 2004)
New Revision: 2077
Modified:
NEWS.xhtml
Log:
Announce 4.3.0.dfsg.1-10 release.
Modified: NEWS.xhtml
===
--- NEWS.xhtml 2004-12-16 10:13:52 UTC (rev 2076)
+++ NE
Author: fabbione
Date: 2004-12-16 05:13:52 -0500 (Thu, 16 Dec 2004)
New Revision: 2076
Added:
tags/4.3.0.dfsg.1-10/
Log:
Tag 4.3.0.dfsg.1-10 release.
Copied: tags/4.3.0.dfsg.1-10 (from rev 2075, branches/4.3.0/sid)
Accepted:
lbxproxy_4.3.0.dfsg.1-10_i386.deb
to pool/main/x/xfree86/lbxproxy_4.3.0.dfsg.1-10_i386.deb
libdps-dev_4.3.0.dfsg.1-10_i386.deb
to pool/main/x/xfree86/libdps-dev_4.3.0.dfsg.1-10_i386.deb
libdps1-dbg_4.3.0.dfsg.1-10_i386.deb
to pool/main/x/xfree86/libdps1-dbg_4.3.0.dfsg.1-10_i386.deb
Your message dated Thu, 16 Dec 2004 04:33:19 -0500
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#285150: fixed in xfree86 4.3.0.dfsg.1-10
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it i
Your message dated Thu, 16 Dec 2004 04:33:19 -0500
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#285133: fixed in xfree86 4.3.0.dfsg.1-10
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it i
Your message dated Thu, 16 Dec 2004 04:33:18 -0500
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#261993: fixed in xfree86 4.3.0.dfsg.1-10
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it i
Your message dated Thu, 16 Dec 2004 04:33:19 -0500
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#281504: fixed in xfree86 4.3.0.dfsg.1-10
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it i
Your message dated Thu, 16 Dec 2004 04:33:18 -0500
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#275318: fixed in xfree86 4.3.0.dfsg.1-10
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it i
Your message dated Thu, 16 Dec 2004 04:33:18 -0500
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#279055: fixed in xfree86 4.3.0.dfsg.1-10
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it i
Your message dated Thu, 16 Dec 2004 04:33:19 -0500
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#285133: fixed in xfree86 4.3.0.dfsg.1-10
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it i
Your message dated Thu, 16 Dec 2004 04:33:19 -0500
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#285150: fixed in xfree86 4.3.0.dfsg.1-10
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it i
Branden Robinson wrote:
Hmm, well, given your backtrace, I might have been wrong about this being
SiS-specific.
#7 0x0848f646 in xf86SigHandler (signo=11) at xf86Events.c:1230
#8
#9 0x40142a1f in memcpy () from /lib/libc.so.6
Can you show us the output of "bt full -9" instead, plea
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Wed, 15 Dec 2004 18:40:17 +0100
Source: xfree86
Binary: libx11-6-dbg libxtst6-dbg xserver-common xlibs-static-dev libxp6-dbg
xbase-clients xlibmesa3-dbg libxtrap6-dbg xfonts-75dpi libxt6 libice6-dbg xmh
libxaw6-dbg x-dev libxv1 libx
xfree86_4.3.0.dfsg.1-10_i386.changes uploaded successfully to localhost
along with the files:
xfree86_4.3.0.dfsg.1-10.dsc
xfree86_4.3.0.dfsg.1-10.diff.gz
pm-dev_4.3.0.dfsg.1-10_all.deb
x-dev_4.3.0.dfsg.1-10_all.deb
xfonts-100dpi_4.3.0.dfsg.1-10_all.deb
xfonts-100dpi-transcoded_4.3.0.dfs
Probably you are the uploader of the following file(s) in
the Debian upload queue directory:
xfree86_4.3.0.dfsg.1-10.diff.gz
xfree86_4.3.0.dfsg.1-10.dsc
This looks like an upload, but a .changes file is missing, so the job
cannot be processed.
If no .changes file arrives within 22:44:20, the f
46 matches
Mail list logo
