On Mon, 2004-12-27 at 21:50 +0100, Nils Nordman wrote:
Also, can you try narrowing down the problem to a single XAA
acceleration primitive using the XaaNo... options documented in the
XF86Config-4 manpage?
With little success I'm afraid. I tried enabling the acceleration again
along
Package: xutils
Version: 4.3.0.dfsg.1-8
Severity: wishlist
Tags: patch
This patch adds an option '-ignoredirs' (like '-ignorelinks') that creates
a symlink even if the target is a directory. This may not be useful for X, but
since the lndir program is usually in the search path, I think you
Daniel Stone wrote:
Ideally, we could get rid of both, but such is life.
Why ? Xprint is one of the greatest innovations for Unix+Linux printing
in the last five years and becomes more and more widespread.
/David
Marc Wilson wrote:
On Tue, Dec 07, 2004 at 11:03:25AM +0300, Nikita V. Youshchenko wrote:
Tried ever to print non iso8859-1 characters from mozilla?
It isn't impossible without xprt, but it is really hacky ...
I will *freely* admit to my North American English bias. I will *also*
freely
On Tue, Dec 28, 2004 at 03:47:48AM -0500, Michel Dänzer wrote:
Weird. Did you verify that no acceleration primitives were listed after
(II) RADEON(0): Using XFree86 Acceleration Architecture (XAA)
?
Yes.
Some cursory testing revealed that more than one acceleration primitive
was able
Package: xlibmesa-gl-dev
Version: 4.3.0.dfsg.1-9
Severity: normal
File: /usr/include/GL/GLwDrawAP.h
See subject.
This file is a private implementation file, therefore the P.
Marcelo
PS: In case you are wondering if I have too much time in my hands, no,
I don't. I was trying to figure
The source I'm using contains the old DRI xc. I can see where the old xc
source is needed to build the OLD Xserver and Mesa is needed there to
build it's dri, glx, and opengl Xdrivers. How ever I can't see why this
old xc code has not been diffed in to debian's Xfree86? Would submitting
a patch
First let me say that if anyone would like to take over updating the
dri-trunk-sid packages on a semi-regular basis, I'd really appreciate
it. I don't track the Debian X or DRI mailing lists closely enough to
keep up with changes.
On Tue, 2004-12-28 at 15:00 -0800, Mike Mestnik wrote:
The
Package: xlibmesa-gl-dev
Version: 4.3.0.dfsg.1-9
Severity: normal
Hi,
the GLw library shipped with the xlibmesa-gl-dev package uses Motif
(both 1.2 and 2), so some sort of dependency should be declared on
lesstif2-dev (Depends, Suggests, Recommends).
Marcelo
On Tue, Dec 28, 2004 at 07:04:26PM +0100, David Schweiger wrote:
lots of pro-Xprint which has been said again and again deleted
And on top of that, it doesn't work! How can you beat that? I again refer
the reader to all the fun 'n games that ensued when the Mozilla maintainer
went insane
On Tue, Dec 28, 2004 at 06:51:02PM +0100, David Schweiger wrote:
Daniel Stone wrote:
Ideally, we could get rid of both, but such is life.
Why ? Xprint is one of the greatest innovations for Unix+Linux printing
in the last five years and becomes more and more widespread.
And name one
Package: xlibosmesa4
Version: 4.3.0.dfsg.1-10
Severity: grave
File: /usr/X11R6/lib/libOSMesa.so.4
Justification: renders package unusable
Hi,
perhaps serious is more appropriate, since it's the dependencies that
are wrong.
$ objdump -T /usr/X11R6/lib/libOSMesa.so.4.0 | grep UND | grep -v
12 matches
Mail list logo
