no it wasnt a file i sent it was one i was supposed to receive
frommaildata/quarentine1 virus-2004 0727-1359331625002 courtasey of
[EMAIL PROTECTED] the worm can you look into this matter and can you tell me
where
its origins lay yours gabrielle , hence [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, emai
On Fri, Dec 02, 2005 at 07:59:34PM -0500, Josh Babcock wrote:
> looks like debian is broken. There was no link from libXmu.so to
> libXmu.so.6 in /usr/X11R6/lib.
> Thanks for the tip.
>
> For you Debian guys:
> Package Installed PreviousNow
> State
> =
Josh Babcock writes:
> looks like debian is broken. There was no link from libXmu.so to
> libXmu.so.6 in /usr/X11R6/lib.
> Thanks for the tip.
>
> For you Debian guys:
> Package Installed PreviousNow
> State
> ===-===-===-==
Josh Babcock <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> OK,
> looks like debian is broken. There was no link from libXmu.so to
> libXmu.so.6 in /usr/X11R6/lib.
> Thanks for the tip.
This link is only needed for building software and as such is part of the
-dev package, not the library package. You want to in
On Tue, Nov 15, 2005 at 02:24:57PM +0100, Julien Cristau wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 15, 2005 at 08:14:58 +, Thomas Dickey wrote:
>
> > of course uxterm is a script. When I've run valgrind recently, I see a
> > lot of problems in glibc (that definitely aren't caused by xterm). I'm
> > inclined to r
Curtis L. Olson wrote:
> The very first thing I would check is the contents of the config.log
> file. That shows the details of the test and the compiler error
> signaling a failure. That often can be quite helpful.
>
> Curt.
>
>
> Josh Babcock wrote:
>
>> I can't figure out why this is happe
On Fri, Dec 02, 2005 at 03:10:10PM +0100, Jan Willem Stumpel wrote:
> David Mart??nez Moreno wrote:
>
> >
> >Could you please test latest version (204-0pre1) from
> >experimental and see if it works? It works for me (I use
> >ISO8859-15):
>
> No, it does not work. I have to set UTF-8 manually jus
On Fri, Dec 02, 2005 at 03:10:11PM +0100, Denis Barbier wrote:
> On Fri, Dec 02, 2005 at 02:23:32PM +0100, Sven Luther wrote:
> > Notice that some locales have shifted to UTF-8 by default for etch (like
> > french, but i think a couple other european languages too, i saw it in
> > german too i thin
Just for the record I was having similar problems see
http://lists.debian.org/debian-x/2005/08/msg00235.html
but after upgrading to partially unstable and experimental, the libgl warnings
have disappeared but I cannot get direct rendering to work. Is this fixed in
experimental and if so how does
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> submitter 205956 !
Bug#205956: xml-resume-library: Wrong name for jar file
Changed Bug submitter from Cesar Eduardo Barros <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> to Cesar
Eduardo Barros <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>.
> submitter 24239 !
Bug#24239: xbase-clients: [xsm] fails to re
Author: dnusinow
Date: 2005-12-02 14:23:28 -0500 (Fri, 02 Dec 2005)
New Revision: 922
Modified:
trunk/xsfbs/xsfbs.mk
Log:
Make genscripts target use re-named shell-lib.sh (xsfbs.sh)
Modified: trunk/xsfbs/xsfbs.mk
===
--- trunk/xsf
Author: dnusinow
Date: 2005-12-02 13:26:22 -0500 (Fri, 02 Dec 2005)
New Revision: 921
Modified:
trunk/xsfbs/xsfbs.mk
Log:
Make prepare target depend on genscripts target
Modified: trunk/xsfbs/xsfbs.mk
===
--- trunk/xsfbs/xsfbs.mk
Author: dnusinow
Date: 2005-12-02 13:14:03 -0500 (Fri, 02 Dec 2005)
New Revision: 920
Modified:
trunk/xsfbs/xsfbs.mk
Log:
Add genscripts target so we can process the xsfbs shell lib
Modified: trunk/xsfbs/xsfbs.mk
===
--- trunk/xsf
Author: dnusinow
Date: 2005-12-02 12:43:01 -0500 (Fri, 02 Dec 2005)
New Revision: 919
Added:
trunk/xsfbs/xsfbs.sh
Log:
Add shell-lib.sh to xsfbs and rename as xsfbs.sh
Added: trunk/xsfbs/xsfbs.sh
===
--- trunk/xsfbs/xsfbs.sh
On Fri, Dec 02, 2005 at 02:51:58PM +0100, Jan Willem Stumpel wrote:
> It it true that 204 has the binary in /usr/bin? It has always been
> in /usr/X11/bin.
/usr/X11R6/bin is happily going away in the Xorg 7.0 release, which we're
currently working on packaging. X will finally be FHS compliant!
On Fri, Dec 02, 2005 at 08:03:16AM +0100, Sven Luther wrote:
> On Fri, Dec 02, 2005 at 12:22:50AM -0500, David Nusinow wrote:
> >Either way, we have to decide what to do with the aliases shipped by
> > upstream. Do we ship an xfonts-aliases package that includes all the
> > aliases in font/alia
David Martínez Moreno wrote:
Could you please test latest version (204-0pre1) from
experimental and see if it works? It works for me (I use
ISO8859-15):
No, it does not work. I have to set UTF-8 manually just like with
version 202. Version 200 is OK.
It it true that 204 has the binary in /us
On Fri, Dec 02, 2005 at 02:23:32PM +0100, Sven Luther wrote:
> Notice that some locales have shifted to UTF-8 by default for etch (like
> french, but i think a couple other european languages too, i saw it in
> german too i think). Will xterm default to the right thing in this case ?
I do not reme
On Fri, Dec 02, 2005 at 01:51:00PM +0100, David Martínez Moreno wrote:
> El viernes, 2 de diciembre de 2005 09:56, Jan Willem Stumpel escribió:
> > Package: xterm
> > Version: 6.8.2.dfsg.1-11
> > Severity: normal
> > Tags: l10n
> >
> >
> > xterm -u8 does not start xterm in UTF-8 mode, nor does spec
El viernes, 2 de diciembre de 2005 09:56, Jan Willem Stumpel escribió:
> Package: xterm
> Version: 6.8.2.dfsg.1-11
> Severity: normal
> Tags: l10n
>
>
> xterm -u8 does not start xterm in UTF-8 mode, nor does specifying
> xterm*VT100*utf8: in ~/.Xresources make xterm start in UTF-8 mode by
> default
Package: xterm
Version: 6.8.2.dfsg.1-11
Severity: normal
Tags: l10n
xterm -u8 does not start xterm in UTF-8 mode, nor does specifying
xterm*VT100*utf8: in ~/.Xresources make xterm start in UTF-8 mode by default.
Xterm can be switched to UTF-8 manually (control-rightclick) in both cases, but
I
21 matches
Mail list logo
