Your message dated Wed, 15 Mar 2006 01:11:29 +0100
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Closing bugs in experimental
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your respo
Your message dated Wed, 15 Mar 2006 01:11:29 +0100
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Closing bugs in experimental
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your respo
Your message dated Wed, 15 Mar 2006 01:11:29 +0100
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Closing bugs in experimental
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your respo
Your message dated Wed, 15 Mar 2006 01:11:29 +0100
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Closing bugs in experimental
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your respo
Your message dated Wed, 15 Mar 2006 01:11:29 +0100
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Closing bugs in experimental
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your respo
Your message dated Wed, 15 Mar 2006 01:11:29 +0100
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Closing bugs in experimental
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your respo
Your message dated Wed, 15 Mar 2006 01:11:29 +0100
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Closing bugs in experimental
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your respo
Your message dated Wed, 15 Mar 2006 01:11:29 +0100
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Closing bugs in experimental
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your respo
Your message dated Wed, 15 Mar 2006 01:11:29 +0100
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Closing bugs in experimental
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your respo
Your message dated Wed, 15 Mar 2006 01:11:29 +0100
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Closing bugs in experimental
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your respo
Your message dated Wed, 15 Mar 2006 01:11:29 +0100
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Closing bugs in experimental
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your respo
Your message dated Wed, 15 Mar 2006 01:11:29 +0100
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Closing bugs in experimental
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your respo
Your message dated Wed, 15 Mar 2006 01:11:29 +0100
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Closing bugs in experimental
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your respo
Your message dated Wed, 15 Mar 2006 01:11:29 +0100
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Closing bugs in experimental
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your respo
Your message dated Wed, 15 Mar 2006 01:11:29 +0100
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Closing bugs in experimental
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your respo
Your message dated Wed, 15 Mar 2006 01:11:29 +0100
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Closing bugs in experimental
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your respo
On Tue, 2006-03-14 at 15:16 +1100, Ian MacKinnell wrote:
> Package: x11-common
>
> Version: 6.8.2.dfsg.1-7
>
> On attempting to upgrade x11-common from 6.8.2.dfsg.1-7 to
> 6.9.0.dfsg.1-4, it fails to upgrade with the error message:
>
> trying to overwite `/usr/include/X11', which is also in pa
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Wed, Mar 15, 2006 at 12:47:43AM +0100, Denis Barbier wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 15, 2006 at 01:31:11AM +0200, Daniel Stone wrote:
> > Right, so you need B-Ds on x11proto-xext-dev, libxtrans-dev, libxau-dev,
> > x11proto-xcmisc-dev, x11proto-kb-dev, x11proto-input-dev. You'd need to
> > version the li
On Wed, Mar 15, 2006 at 01:31:11AM +0200, Daniel Stone wrote:
> Right, so you need B-Ds on x11proto-xext-dev, libxtrans-dev, libxau-dev,
> x11proto-xcmisc-dev, x11proto-kb-dev, x11proto-input-dev. You'd need to
> version the libxau-dev B-D.
SVN is right now, except that libxtrans-dev is named xtr
On Wed, Mar 15, 2006 at 01:21:58AM +0200, Daniel Stone wrote:
> > If I understand, you suggest to apply the attached patch, right?
>
> > Index: debian/control
> > ===
> > --- debian/control (révision 1454)
> > +++ debian/control (co
On Tue, Mar 14, 2006 at 11:59:58PM +0100, Kurt Roeckx wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 14, 2006 at 11:50:34PM +0100, Denis Barbier wrote:
> > On Tue, Mar 14, 2006 at 11:03:32PM +0100, Kurt Roeckx wrote:
> > > Anyway, the package checks for a "inputproto.pc" file directly.
> > > It doesn't check for xextproto.p
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> tags 356918 pending
Bug#356918: libx11: FTBFS in experimental.
There were no tags set.
Tags added: pending
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bu
On Tue, Mar 14, 2006 at 11:59:39PM +0100, Denis Barbier wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 15, 2006 at 12:18:43AM +0200, Daniel Stone wrote:
> > On Tue, Mar 14, 2006 at 10:49:50PM +0100, Denis Barbier wrote:
> > > On Tue, Mar 14, 2006 at 07:49:42PM +0100, Kurt Roeckx wrote:
> > > > Your package is still failing
tags 356918 pending
thanks
On Tue, Mar 14, 2006 at 11:59:58PM +0100, Kurt Roeckx wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 14, 2006 at 11:50:34PM +0100, Denis Barbier wrote:
> > On Tue, Mar 14, 2006 at 11:03:32PM +0100, Kurt Roeckx wrote:
> > > Anyway, the package checks for a "inputproto.pc" file directly.
> > > It d
Author: barbier
Date: 2006-03-14 18:25:49 -0500 (Tue, 14 Mar 2006)
New Revision: 1460
Modified:
branches/modular/proto/xextproto-X11R7.0-7.0.2/debian/changelog
branches/modular/proto/xextproto-X11R7.0-7.0.2/debian/control
Log:
* Replace dependency on libxi-dev by x11proto-input-dev, as sug
Author: barbier
Date: 2006-03-14 18:18:52 -0500 (Tue, 14 Mar 2006)
New Revision: 1459
Modified:
branches/modular/lib/libX11-X11R7.0-1.0.0/debian/changelog
Log:
Add committer's name
Modified: branches/modular/lib/libX11-X11R7.0-1.0.0/debian/changelog
===
Author: barbier
Date: 2006-03-14 18:16:11 -0500 (Tue, 14 Mar 2006)
New Revision: 1458
Modified:
branches/modular/lib/libX11-X11R7.0-1.0.0/debian/changelog
branches/modular/lib/libX11-X11R7.0-1.0.0/debian/control
Log:
Also add Build-Depends: x11proto-input-dev. Thanks Kurt Roeckx.
Modified
On Tue, Mar 14, 2006 at 11:50:34PM +0100, Denis Barbier wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 14, 2006 at 11:03:32PM +0100, Kurt Roeckx wrote:
> > Anyway, the package checks for a "inputproto.pc" file directly.
> > It doesn't check for xextproto.pc (at that point), and libxi-dev
> > doesn't even contain a .pc file.
On Wed, Mar 15, 2006 at 12:18:43AM +0200, Daniel Stone wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 14, 2006 at 10:49:50PM +0100, Denis Barbier wrote:
> > On Tue, Mar 14, 2006 at 07:49:42PM +0100, Kurt Roeckx wrote:
> > > Your package is still failing to build. First I get:
> > > checking for XKBPROTO... configure: error
On Tue, Mar 14, 2006 at 11:03:32PM +0100, Kurt Roeckx wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 14, 2006 at 10:49:50PM +0100, Denis Barbier wrote:
> > On Tue, Mar 14, 2006 at 07:49:42PM +0100, Kurt Roeckx wrote:
> > > Package: libx11
> > > Version: 1:1.0.0-3
> > > Severity: serious
> > > Tags: serious
> > >
> > > Hi,
On Tue, Mar 14, 2006 at 10:49:50PM +0100, Denis Barbier wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 14, 2006 at 07:49:42PM +0100, Kurt Roeckx wrote:
> > Your package is still failing to build. First I get:
> > checking for XKBPROTO... configure: error: Package requirements
> [...]
> > Which seems to be a missing build d
Author: barbier
Date: 2006-03-14 17:05:55 -0500 (Tue, 14 Mar 2006)
New Revision: 1457
Modified:
branches/modular/lib/libX11-X11R7.0-1.0.0/debian/changelog
branches/modular/lib/libX11-X11R7.0-1.0.0/debian/control
Log:
Add Build-Depends: quilt.
Modified: branches/modular/lib/libX11-X11R7.0-1
Your message dated Tue, 14 Mar 2006 23:53:34 +0200
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#356938: xserver-xorg: unable to switch VTs
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it
On Tue, Mar 14, 2006 at 10:49:50PM +0100, Denis Barbier wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 14, 2006 at 07:49:42PM +0100, Kurt Roeckx wrote:
> > Package: libx11
> > Version: 1:1.0.0-3
> > Severity: serious
> > Tags: serious
> >
> > Hi,
> >
> > Your package is still failing to build. First I get:
> > checking f
On Tue, Mar 14, 2006 at 07:49:42PM +0100, Kurt Roeckx wrote:
> Package: libx11
> Version: 1:1.0.0-3
> Severity: serious
> Tags: serious
>
> Hi,
>
> Your package is still failing to build. First I get:
> checking for XKBPROTO... configure: error: Package requirements
[...]
> Which seems to be a m
Package: xterm
Version: 208-3.1
Followup-For: Bug #347790
The attached patch fixes this issue, and additionally alters the
behavior of boldMode. Previously, boldMode only had an effect on the
primary font. This patch extends the option to also affect the
alternate fonts font1, font2, font3, etc.
On Tue, Mar 14, 2006 at 02:40:22PM +0100, Luca Capello wrote:
> Hello!
>
> On Sun, 26 Feb 2006 22:53:06 +0100, David Nusinow wrote:
> > On Fri, Feb 24, 2006 at 09:41:11AM +0200, Daniel Stone wrote:
> >> On Thu, Feb 23, 2006 at 10:31:46PM -0500, David Nusinow wrote:
> >> > On Thu, Feb 23, 2006 at 0
Package: xserver-xorg
Version: 6.9.0.dfsg.1-4
Severity: normal
After the transition from XFree86 to X.Org I am unable to switch
from X to the virtual consoles. Ctrl-Alt-Fx does nothing.
When X is down, switching between the consoles is possible.
A similar bug seems to be files on freedesktop.org:
Package: libx11
Version: 1:1.0.0-3
Severity: serious
Tags: serious
Hi,
Your package is still failing to build. First I get:
checking for XKBPROTO... configure: error: Package requirements
(kbproto inputproto) were not met:
No package 'inputproto' found
Consider adjusting the PKG_CONFIG_PATH en
Package: xserver-xorg-core
Version: 1:1.0.1-2
Severity: minor
Tags: experimental
Hello,
as the title suggest, every time I launch `startx` I have that output,
which is normal, as there's no SecurityPolicy file on my box where
X.org could find it:
=
gismo:/home/luca# updatedb
gismo:/home/luca#
# 356858
s/completion/completeness/
And I forgot to mention: libc6 is currently at 2.3.6-3
(whole system at latest unstable/experimental.)
Regards,
Jan
--
Jan C. Nordholz
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Package: x11-common
Version: 6.9.0.dfsg.1-4
Severity: normal
Hi,
/tmp/.ICE-unix is deleted by bootclean script during entering
single-user mode (telinit 1), but is not recreated during returning back
to original runlevel.
It's because /etc/init.d/x11-common script is executed only in
runlevel S,
Package: xdm
Version: 1:1.0.1-2
Tags: experimental
Hi,
xdm makes the presumption that the "ifa_addr" pointer member
of the ifaddrs structures returned by getifaddrs() is
always valid (i.e. non-NULL):
731 Debug("DefineSelf\n");
732 if (getifaddrs(&ifap) < 0)
733 retur
Hello!
On Sun, 26 Feb 2006 22:53:06 +0100, David Nusinow wrote:
> On Fri, Feb 24, 2006 at 09:41:11AM +0200, Daniel Stone wrote:
>> On Thu, Feb 23, 2006 at 10:31:46PM -0500, David Nusinow wrote:
>> > On Thu, Feb 23, 2006 at 04:25:31PM +0100, Silvestre Zabala wrote:
>> > > See subject.
>> > > The fi
Package: xdmx-tools
Version: 1:1.0.1-2
Severity: minor
Hi,
I dunno if it's OK, but the xdmx-tools packages contains no useful file:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:~]$ dpkg -L xdmx-tools
/.
/usr
/usr/share
/usr/share/doc
/usr/share/doc/xdmx-tools
/usr/share/doc/xdmx-tools/copyright
/usr/share/doc/xdmx-tools/
46 matches
Mail list logo
