I already mentioned here and there that the xorg package debconf
templates do not follow the recommendations given in the developer's
reference, which are mostly aimed at achieving overall writing style
consistency in questions seen by users.
Attached to this mail is a rewrite of the two
Package: libx11-dev
Version: 2:1.0.0-6
Severity: normal
When trying to compile libx11 and libxext from source I run into the
following dependency problem:
- libx11-dev depends on libxext-dev
- libxext build-depends on libx11-dev
.. therefore I am unable to build libxext!
I am not sure whether
On Tue, 2006-05-09 at 20:31 +0200, Sven Marnach wrote:
Michel Dänzer schrieb am Di, 09. Mai 2006, um 15:07:44 +0200:
Does either of the following options make a difference?
Option SilkenMouse off
Option ColorTiling off
Option SWcursor
No.
Bummer, thanks for trying.
On Wed, May 10, 2006 at 08:21:52AM +0200, Christian Perrier wrote:
I personnally prefer experimented over advanced because advanced
is negative towards other users.
What is experimented user? Did you mean experienced?
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of
On Wed, 2006-05-10 at 00:08 +0200, Christian Hammers wrote:
On 2006-05-09 Michel Dänzer wrote:
Does the X server still crash with the DRI enabled with
xserver-xorg-video-ati 1:6.5.8.0-1?
It still crashes with the above version.
Bummer. It would be great if you could also try with the
Package: xserver-xorg-core
Version: 1:1.0.2-8
Followup-For: Bug #365654
I believe I am seeing this too.
When I try to start Xorg, the vt switches to a blank screen and the
system becomes entirely unresponsive to keyboard input, including
Ctrl-Alt-Backspace and Ctrl-Alt-F1.
After sshing in, I
El miércoles, 10 de mayo de 2006 11:07, Stepan Golosunov escribió:
On Wed, May 10, 2006 at 08:21:52AM +0200, Christian Perrier wrote:
I personnally prefer experimented over advanced because advanced
is negative towards other users.
What is experimented user? Did you mean experienced?
El miércoles, 10 de mayo de 2006 08:21, Christian Perrier escribió:
I already mentioned here and there that the xorg package debconf
templates do not follow the recommendations given in the developer's
reference, which are mostly aimed at achieving overall writing style
consistency in
El miércoles, 10 de mayo de 2006 08:57, Sean Smith escribió:
Package: xserver-xorg-core
Version: 1:1.0.2-8
Followup-For: Bug #365654
I believe I am seeing this too.
When I try to start Xorg, the vt switches to a blank screen and the
system becomes entirely unresponsive to keyboard input,
Package: xserver-xorg-video-i810
Version: 1:1.5.1.0-2
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable
Due to a power outage, I had to re-boot my etch box after some months,
during which I'd updated it, so am now using the modern xserver-xorg-*
package fragments, where I was using a more
On Wed, 10 May 2006, Edward Welbourne wrote:
Package: xserver-xorg-video-i810
Version: 1:1.5.1.0-2
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable
[...]
It looks like the package I want is xserver-xorg-video-i810; but, when
I tried to install that, it was broken, because it depends on
#
# bts-link upstream status pull for source package xorg-server
# see http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel-announce/2006/05/msg1.html
#
user [EMAIL PROTECTED]
# remote status report for #363120
# * https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=5209
# * remote status changed: ASSIGNED -
http://packages.debian.org/xserver-xorg-core
Yes, I know that package is not available on testing.
That's why I submitted the bug against xserver-xorg-video-i810,
not against xserver-xorg-core.
http://packages.debian.org/xserver-xorg-video-i810
says it's available on testing.
It
* appears to
Hello,
Try :
Option ZAxisMapping 4 5
It work fine for me ;-)
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
reassign 366695 xdm
Bug#366695: xserver-xorg-video-i810: Depends on unavailable xserver-xorg-core
on etch.
Bug reassigned from package `xserver-xorg-video-i810' to `xdm'.
merge 366695 366599
Bug#366599: xdm looks for /usr/bin/X, but I have
Actually, this magically went away for me. I'm not seeing this issue
any more (although I have another, my NVidia drivers don't accelerate,
but I haven't filed a bug yet), but I can provide my log and conf files
if you *really* want them.
Thanks,
Benjamin Kudria
On Wed, 10 May 2006 14:00:40
On Wed, 2006-05-10 at 10:51 -0400, Benjamin Kudria wrote:
Actually, this magically went away for me. I'm not seeing this issue
any more (although I have another, my NVidia drivers don't accelerate,
but I haven't filed a bug yet), but I can provide my log and conf files
if you *really* want
On Wed, May 10, 2006 at 02:00:47PM +0200, David Mart?nez Moreno wrote:
Please send your /var/log/Xorg.0.log and your /etc/X11/xorg.conf files,
as it
will be most probably related to Ati driver instead of xserver-xorg-core.
OK, here they are. Indeed, I have an ATI 9200SE card.
Is
reassign 366695 xdm
merge 366695 366599
thanks
On Wed, May 10, 2006 at 03:12:30PM +0200, Edward Welbourne wrote:
Package: xserver-xorg-video-i810
Version: 1:1.5.1.0-2
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable
Due to a power outage, I had to re-boot my etch box after some
Remove the individual i810 driver package,
it wouldn't install, so that was be a no-op !
the xserver-xorg package in testing includes the driver you want.
when I dpkg-reconfigure it, it starts by asking whether I want to let
it autodetect: and says that it can't recognize what it finds.
If
Quoting Stepan Golosunov ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
On Wed, May 10, 2006 at 08:21:52AM +0200, Christian Perrier wrote:
I personnally prefer experimented over advanced because advanced
is negative towards other users.
What is experimented user? Did you mean experienced?
Yep. Guess why I have
On Wed, May 10, 2006 at 03:12:30PM +0200, Edward Welbourne wrote:
Package: xserver-xorg-video-i810
Version: 1:1.5.1.0-2
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable
Due to a power outage, I had to re-boot my etch box after some months,
during which I'd updated it, so am now
This is http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=365134
It still failed, now saying that it couldn't make sense of the
hardware ... Then I remembered that xorg had recently gone into
many-package form, so went looking for a suitable
xserver-xorg-video-* for the hardware reported to
* Tore Anderson
Yep, it did, using 2.6.15-1-k7. I ran that kernel for a long time
with X11R6 on top and didn't have any problems at all, so it seems
very unlikely that the kernel is to blame.
Hi David,
Do you think there's any hope of getting nearer any solution to this
bug in
On Sat, May 06, 2006 at 10:32:25PM -0400, Nathanael Nerode wrote:
With the modular split of Xorg 7, these files have probably scattered to
different packages.
Can someone suggest a good strategy for figuring out which packages currently
contain the affected files? I don't want to download
On Tue, May 09, 2006 at 08:55:03PM +1000, Peter Chubb wrote:
I tried to upgrade from Xserver-xfree86 to xserver-xorg. The
XF86Config-4 file had the mouse device as /dev/input/mice. The
rewritten xorg.conf file had /dev/mouse, which doesn't exist on my
system. It looks as though the info in
Package: xserver-xorg-input-mouse
Version: 1:1.0.4-2
Severity: important
Tags: patch
Justification: makes mouse scroll wheels almost completely useless
When using my mouse in Firefox, among other applications, scrolling up or down
very quickly generates left and right events instead of the proper
27 matches
Mail list logo
