Re: Request For Permission To Upload Xorg 7.1 To Unstable

2006-08-24 Thread Steve Langasek
David and I have had some useful discussions about this on IRC over the last couple of days; let's recap here for those who haven't been around on #debian-x. On Wed, Aug 16, 2006 at 08:59:41PM +, David Nusinow wrote: Some pieces of this are already in place. The various Xorg applications

Re: Request For Permission To Upload Xorg 7.1 To Unstable

2006-08-24 Thread Daniel Stone
On Wed, Aug 23, 2006 at 11:00:25PM -0700, Steve Langasek wrote: Clarification: the libxfixes change is a shlibs change, not an soname change. (soversion normally refers to the numeric component of an soname; apparently xorg upstream uses the term differently.)

Re: Request For Permission To Upload Xorg 7.1 To Unstable

2006-08-24 Thread Steve Langasek
On Thu, Aug 24, 2006 at 10:33:44AM +0300, Daniel Stone wrote: On Wed, Aug 23, 2006 at 11:00:25PM -0700, Steve Langasek wrote: Clarification: the libxfixes change is a shlibs change, not an soname change. (soversion normally refers to the numeric component of an soname; apparently xorg

Bug#384151: please add 1280x800 to the list of valid resolutions

2006-08-24 Thread Robert Millan [ackstorm]
On Wed, Aug 23, 2006 at 11:58:57AM +0200, Christian Perrier wrote: As for 1280x800, I noticed that it is now present, but I think turning the multiselect into an open text template (perhaps even with an empty default) might be a good idea. I don't think so as this would be very likely

Re: Bug#384282: libgl1-mesa-glx: Confusing description and provide, libgl1-mesa-dri not pulled in on upgrades.

2006-08-24 Thread Michel Dänzer
On Wed, 2006-08-23 at 20:40 +, David Nusinow wrote: On Wed, Aug 23, 2006 at 11:00:37AM +0200, Michel Dänzer wrote: On Wed, 2006-08-23 at 09:30 +0200, Sven Luther wrote: Not sure exactly what the right solution to this is. It seems quite clear the first step is to remove the

Re: Bug#384282: libgl1-mesa-glx: Confusing description and provide, libgl1-mesa-dri not pulled in on upgrades.

2006-08-24 Thread Michel Dänzer
On Thu, 2006-08-24 at 12:00 +0200, Michel Dänzer wrote: On Wed, 2006-08-23 at 20:40 +, David Nusinow wrote: Also, would it be possible for us to open up the mesa repo a little bit? I don't want to maintain mesa, but I'd be happy to do small fixes like this while Marcelo is busy. I

Re: X Strike Force X.Org X11 SVN commit: r2912 - in branches/7.1/xserver/xorg-server/debian: . patches

2006-08-24 Thread Michel Dänzer
On Wed, 2006-08-23 at 22:02 -0400, X Strike Force SVN Repository Admin wrote: Author: dnusinow Date: 2006-08-23 22:02:31 -0400 (Wed, 23 Aug 2006) New Revision: 2912 Added: branches/7.1/xserver/xorg-server/debian/patches/17_ignoreabi.diff Modified:

Bug#384450: Subject: xserver-xorg-core: Fails to start with invalid io allocation

2006-08-24 Thread Tom A
Package: xserver-xorg-coreVersion: 1:1.0.2-9Severity: importantX fails to start with invalid io allocation.(WW) INVALID IO ALLOCATION b: 0xb000 e: 0xb07f correcting(EE) Cannot find a replacement memory range (EE) NVIDIA(0): Resource conflicts detectedI am able to get it to work if I apply

Re: Request For Permission To Upload Xorg 7.1 To Unstable

2006-08-24 Thread Daniel Stone
On Thu, Aug 24, 2006 at 01:08:35AM -0700, Steve Langasek wrote: On Thu, Aug 24, 2006 at 10:33:44AM +0300, Daniel Stone wrote: On Wed, Aug 23, 2006 at 11:00:25PM -0700, Steve Langasek wrote: Clarification: the libxfixes change is a shlibs change, not an soname change. (soversion normally

Re: Request For Permission To Upload Xorg 7.1 To Unstable

2006-08-24 Thread Steve Langasek
On Thu, Aug 24, 2006 at 01:05:51PM +0300, Daniel Stone wrote: On Thu, Aug 24, 2006 at 01:08:35AM -0700, Steve Langasek wrote: On Thu, Aug 24, 2006 at 10:33:44AM +0300, Daniel Stone wrote: On Wed, Aug 23, 2006 at 11:00:25PM -0700, Steve Langasek wrote: Clarification: the libxfixes change

Re: Request For Permission To Upload Xorg 7.1 To Unstable

2006-08-24 Thread Daniel Stone
On Thu, Aug 24, 2006 at 03:15:20AM -0700, Steve Langasek wrote: On Thu, Aug 24, 2006 at 01:05:51PM +0300, Daniel Stone wrote: That the soversion, being the numeric component of the soname, changed from 3.0.0 to 3.1.0? The numeric component of the soname is 3. Mea culpa. signature.asc

Processed: bug 384450 is forwarded to https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=6377

2006-08-24 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.9.20 forwarded 384450 https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=6377 Bug#384450: Subject: xserver-xorg-core: Fails to start with invalid io allocation Noted your statement that Bug has

X Strike Force X.Org X11 SVN commit: r3011 - in branches/7.1/driver/xserver-xorg-input-keyboard: . man src

2006-08-24 Thread X Strike Force SVN Repository Admin
Author: dparsons Date: 2006-08-24 10:22:50 -0400 (Thu, 24 Aug 2006) New Revision: 3011 Modified: branches/7.1/driver/xserver-xorg-input-keyboard/ChangeLog branches/7.1/driver/xserver-xorg-input-keyboard/Makefile.in branches/7.1/driver/xserver-xorg-input-keyboard/aclocal.m4

X Strike Force X.Org X11 SVN commit: r3012 - branches/7.1/driver/xserver-xorg-input-keyboard/debian

2006-08-24 Thread X Strike Force SVN Repository Admin
Author: dparsons Date: 2006-08-24 10:50:02 -0400 (Thu, 24 Aug 2006) New Revision: 3012 Added: branches/7.1/driver/xserver-xorg-input-keyboard/debian/xserver-xorg-input-kbd.manpages Modified: branches/7.1/driver/xserver-xorg-input-keyboard/debian/changelog

X Strike Force X.Org X11 SVN commit: r3013 - tags/driver/xserver-xorg-input-keyboard

2006-08-24 Thread X Strike Force SVN Repository Admin
Author: dparsons Date: 2006-08-24 11:02:32 -0400 (Thu, 24 Aug 2006) New Revision: 3013 Added: tags/driver/xserver-xorg-input-keyboard/1:1.1.0-1/ Log: Tag xserver-xorg-input-keyboard (1:1.1.0-1), uploaded to experimental. Copied: tags/driver/xserver-xorg-input-keyboard/1:1.1.0-1 (from rev

xserver-xorg-input-keyboard_1.1.0-1_i386.changes ACCEPTED

2006-08-24 Thread Debian Installer
Accepted: xserver-xorg-input-kbd_1.1.0-1_i386.deb to pool/main/x/xserver-xorg-input-keyboard/xserver-xorg-input-kbd_1.1.0-1_i386.deb xserver-xorg-input-keyboard_1.1.0-1.diff.gz to pool/main/x/xserver-xorg-input-keyboard/xserver-xorg-input-keyboard_1.1.0-1.diff.gz

X Strike Force X.Org X11 SVN commit: r3014 - branches/7.1/driver/xserver-xorg-input-keyboard/debian

2006-08-24 Thread X Strike Force SVN Repository Admin
Author: dparsons Date: 2006-08-24 11:19:06 -0400 (Thu, 24 Aug 2006) New Revision: 3014 Modified: branches/7.1/driver/xserver-xorg-input-keyboard/debian/changelog branches/7.1/driver/xserver-xorg-input-keyboard/debian/control Log: Build-Depends: xserver-xorg-dev (= 2:1.1.1-4) (see

Processing of xserver-xorg-input-keyboard_1.1.0-1_i386.changes

2006-08-24 Thread Archive Administrator
xserver-xorg-input-keyboard_1.1.0-1_i386.changes uploaded successfully to localhost along with the files: xserver-xorg-input-keyboard_1.1.0-1.dsc xserver-xorg-input-keyboard_1.1.0.orig.tar.gz xserver-xorg-input-keyboard_1.1.0-1.diff.gz xserver-xorg-input-kbd_1.1.0-1_i386.deb Greetings,

Bug#367675: xserver-xorg-input-aiptek: The X driver don't work with hyperpen 1200 U

2006-08-24 Thread Drew Parsons
Guy wrote: When i launch gaiptek (manualy compiled), i get this message : There is no XServer Input Driver associated with the tablet Hello Guy. The Xorg log is located at /var/log/Xorg.0.log. Look inside it for aiptek, it will probably contain clues to what's going wrong. Drew -- To

Re: glibc and UNACCEPTs

2006-08-24 Thread Luca Capello
Hello! On Tue, 22 Aug 2006 20:51:56 +0200, David Nusinow wrote: On Tue, Aug 22, 2006 at 03:30:07PM -0400, Joey Hess wrote: Drew Parsons wrote: Unfortunately it's happened against, this time with the upload of xorg-server (xserver-xorg-core) 1:1.1.1-3, accidentally uploaded to unstable

Re: glibc and UNACCEPTs

2006-08-24 Thread Michel Dänzer
On Thu, 2006-08-24 at 16:51 +0200, Luca Capello wrote: If it's not my fault, however, I think we need a new package in experimental... Already uploaded. -- Earthling Michel Dänzer | http://tungstengraphics.com Libre software enthusiast | Debian, X and

libxfont 1:1.2.0-2 MIGRATED to testing

2006-08-24 Thread Debian testing watch
FYI: The status of the libxfont source package in Debian's testing distribution has changed. Previous version: 1:1.0.0-4 Current version: 1:1.2.0-2 -- This email is automatically generated; [EMAIL PROTECTED] is responsible. See http://people.debian.org/~henning/trille/ for more

xutils-dev 1:7.1.ds-2 MIGRATED to testing

2006-08-24 Thread Debian testing watch
FYI: The status of the xutils-dev source package in Debian's testing distribution has changed. Previous version: 1:1.0.2-3 Current version: 1:7.1.ds-2 -- This email is automatically generated; [EMAIL PROTECTED] is responsible. See http://people.debian.org/~henning/trille/ for more

Re: Request For Permission To Upload Xorg 7.1 To Unstable

2006-08-24 Thread Drew Parsons
Steve Langasek wrote: but AFAICS libxfixes is tied to the server only by build-deps, which means the server won't delay getting the libxfixes update into unstable. More precisely, the server only depends on the fixes proto header, not on libxfixes. The lib is only used by client code. We

Processed: Moreinfo received

2006-08-24 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: tags 230787 -moreinfo +confirmed Unknown tag/s: +confirmed. Recognized are: patch wontfix moreinfo unreproducible fixed potato woody sid help security upstream pending sarge sarge-ignore experimental d-i confirmed ipv6 lfs fixed-in-experimental

Bug#199032: marked as done (xterm: sometimes stops accepting keyboard input when tethereal is running for a long time over ssh)

2006-08-24 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Thu, 24 Aug 2006 20:42:43 -0400 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line I think from the bug trail that this is fixed has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it

Bug#240847: marked as done (xbase-clients: [xclock] manpage does not document use of Xrender)

2006-08-24 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Thu, 24 Aug 2006 21:15:05 -0400 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line I believe this bug is fixed has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your

Processed: Reassign due to package split

2006-08-24 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: reassign 40453 xfonts-utils Bug#40453: xbase-clients: update-fonts-alias should not write into /usr [waiting on FHS awareness upstream] Bug reassigned from package `xbase-clients' to `xfonts-utils'. reassign 26976 xutils Bug#26976: xbase-clients:

Re: glibc and UNACCEPTs

2006-08-24 Thread Gustavo Noronha Silva
Em Tue, 22 Aug 2006 23:47:09 -0300 Otavio Salvador [EMAIL PROTECTED] escreveu: Drew Parsons [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: e.g. build: test_stable patch build-stamp instead of build: patch build-stamp That would be good to be add in cdbs. I think we might want to have it more flexible

Processed: more bug triage for 'kernel'

2006-08-24 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: retitle 248940: kernel: caps lock key events delayed on Toshiba Libretto L5 laptop Unknown command or malformed arguments to command. reassign 248940 linux-2.6 Bug#248940: kernel: caps lock key events delayed on Toshiba Libretto L5 laptop [BUG